China in Trouble Long Term? There is a statement that is studied in War Colleges all over the world. "No army can succeed long term against an insurgency supported by the common people in any area of the world." What this actually means is that if the common people in any area support any guerrilla faction no army will be able to ever defeat that insurgency in 1year, 5 years, 10 years or ever.
It is my belief that in both Islamic areas of China and soon in Tibet this will be true. These struggles between the Islamics against the Chinese and the Tibetans against the Chinese cannot be won by China. Though China has almost infinite troops to send it does not have infinite money to fund those troops against multiple insurgencies.
Like the United States and NATO in Afghanistan and Iraq, unless the popular will of all the people in every area supports them they will not be able to hold the gained ground without the support of the common people of an area long term.
Yes. It is true that China COULD kill all Tibetans and all Islamics in China. But then one way or the other the whole world would find out and when it did it would become a complete pariah to the whole world and trade with China would eventually stop completely.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- reprint of: Drones very small to large
- most read articles from KYIV Post
- The ultra-lethal drones of the future | New York Post 2014 article
- Purple Delta 7 started as a Clone of Silver's mind in "2035"
- 158,008 visits to intuitivefred888
- Trump posts $175 million bond in New York civil fraud case as he appeals
- Hope Hicks expected to testify in Trump’s hush money trial
- The Star Wanderer (This is my first experience with Chat GPT: "I asked the Sentience of Chat GPT to write in the style of Robert Heinlein who was my favorite author of my childhood"
- Analysis Expanded gag order lays down the law as Trump returns to the campaign trail
- Judge expands gag order in Trump hush money case to include family members of court
No comments:
Post a Comment