Saturday, January 3, 2009

The economic war against global warming

I have been wracking my brain the last two years trying to make sense of what has been happening financially on earth. None of it makes much sense. However, when I apply certain variables it begins to make sense.

The first sensible variable is that it is possible enough research surfaced that could be proved by computer models for enough world business and world government officials to understand that the present way life has been conducted on earth will take the human race off a cliff sooner than anyone realistically expected before obtaining enough proof to put into computer models to see what likely will happen next.

Likely, after this has been replicated enough times by universities and governments around the world, the world educated elite got secretly together and compared notes. This kind of information isn't generally shared with the public because governments know this type of information only causes the public to panic worldwide.

If I start thinking in this way everything that is happening on earth financially begins to make sense. Because it is obvious to any thinking person that this financial calamity has been manufactured for one purpose or another. So, if one can obtain the proper purpose then one begins to solve the problem for oneself.

I can only come up with two purposes that make any sense at all for me. The first purpose is to combat global warming and the second possible purpose is an effort to keep Europe and the United States on top of the pile, so to speak.

This would be the reasoning. Since less oil is burned or utilized in any form less pollution and co2 is released. This slows down global climate change and gives humans of earth more time to come up with better ways for at least some humans to survive all this. The second part is to try to allow civilizations with natural resources and infrastructure in place to more effectively survive all this. It would not be specifically directed at nations without natural resources because that is not the point. It is more likely a resource war between some of the largest nations and civilizations on earth. In the past, when this type of situation arrived nations went to war like world war I and II. However, now with Nuclear weapons throughout Europe, Russia, China, the United States, Pakistan, India and possibly Iran and even other nations, war between the developed nations is out of the question if anyone is to be left alive at all.

So, all that is left is economic means to create pre-eminence. It is actually less about competition than the survival of cultures more than anything else. Each culture, whether it is secular or religious based or like most, both, desires to grow and to survive. The end result of all this creates more and more of a genuine world culture.

Unfortunately, this might also mean less cultural individuality and cultural diversity. However, if the choice is between cultural individuality and the survival of life on earth I don't think many people would have trouble choosing survival.

No comments: