Sunday, March 30, 2014

7.5 quake on California fault could be disastrous

7.5 quake on California fault could be disastrous

7.5 quake on California fault could be disastrous

Posted: Mar 30, 2014 9:46 AM PDT Updated: Mar 30, 2014 10:46 AM PDT
LA HABRA, Calif. (AP) - Experts say a bigger earthquake along the lesser-known fault that gave Southern California a moderate shake could do more damage to the region than the long-dreaded "Big One" from the more famous San Andreas Fault.
The Puente Hills thrust fault, which brought Friday night's magnitude-5.1 quake centered in La Habra and well over 100 aftershocks by Sunday, stretches from northern Orange County under downtown Los Angeles into Hollywood - a heavily populated swath of the Los Angeles area.
A magnitude-7.5 earthquake along that fault could prove more catastrophic than one along the San Andreas, which runs along the outskirts of metropolitan Southern California, seismologists told the Los Angeles Times (http://lat.ms/1houJzW ).
The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that such a quake along the Puente Hills fault could kill 3,000 to 18,000 people and cause up to $250 billion in damage. In contrast, a larger magnitude 8 quake along the San Andreas would cause an estimated 1,800 deaths.
In 1987, the fault caused the Whittier Narrows earthquake. Still considered moderate at magnitude 5.9, that quake killed eight people and did more than $350 million in damage.
Part of the problem with the potential damage is that the fault runs near so many vulnerable older buildings, many made of concrete, in downtown Los Angeles and Hollywood. And because the fault, discovered in 1999, is horizontal, heavy reverberations are likely to be felt over a wide area.
The shaking from a 7.5 quake in the center of urban Los Angeles could be so intense it would lift heavy objects in the air, like the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake in Northern California, where the shaking was so bad "we found an upside-down grand piano," USGS seismologist Lucy Jones told the Times.
That would "hit all of downtown," Jones said. "And everywhere from La Habra to Hollywood."
About 150 aftershocks, including one of magnitude-4.1, were felt since Friday night's quake, which forced several dozen people in the Orange County city of Fullerton out of their homes after firefighters discovered foundation problems that made the buildings unsafe to enter, authorities said.
Fire crews red-tagged 20 apartment units after finding a major foundation crack. Structural woes, including broken chimneys and leaning, were uncovered in half a dozen single-family houses, which were also deemed unsafe to occupy until building inspectors clear the structures. Seventy residents remained displaced, down from 83 after the initial quake.
Another 14 residential structures around the city suffered lesser damage, including collapsed fireplaces.
A water-main break flooded several floors of Brea City Hall, and the shaking knocked down computers and ceiling tiles, Stokes said.
It was not immediately clear if City Hall would reopen Monday. An email to the mayor was not immediately returned.
___
Information from: Los Angeles Times, http://www.latimes.com
end quote from:

Read more: http://www.myfoxhouston.com/story/25111460/75-quake-on-california-fault-could-be-disastrous#ixzz2xTc3kcQq

Yes. Some of the older and oldest buildings in the Greater L.A. area are from La Habra west through East L.A. into old Downtown L.A. and over into Hollywood. Unfortunately, the biggest buildings in Los Angeles:

List of tallest buildings in Los Angeles - Wikipedia, the free ...

en.wikipedia.org/.../List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Los_Angeles
Wikipedia
This list of tallest buildings in Los Angeles ranks skyscrapers in the U.S. city of Los Angeles, California by height. The tallest building in Los Angeles is the ...

are also in this same lineup if we are moving from La Habra towards Los Angeles proper and into Hollywood.

So, if this is the fault that hits rather than the San Andreas Fault then a disaster likely bigger than the 1906 San Francisco earthquake could occur. I think only 3000 people for sure died in that quake but it basically broke every window in the city proper and knocked down a whole lot of buildings because building codes hadn't changed yet to what they are now after that quake and the Alaska Quake in 1964. The Alaska quake is likely one of the biggest ever recorded anywhere.

Here is a word button for the 1964 Alaskan quake if you are interested:

About 3,060,000 results (0.26 seconds) 

Search Results

1964 Alaska earthquake - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1964_Alaska_earthquake
Wikipedia
The 1964 Alaskan earthquake, also known as the Great Alaskan Earthquake and ... 78 miles (125 km) east of Anchorage and 40 miles (64 km) west of Valdez.
 
I think the requirement for large buildings when they were built was to withstand a 7.0 directly under them so they could sway but not break apart in response to the quake. However, if a 7.5 quake hit close enough to them some of them might fall down too and this could result (depending upon the time of day and day of the week) in a great loss of lives sort of similar to 9-11 with the World Trade center buildings.

 

No comments: