Monday, October 26, 2015

Challenging Chinese Claims, US Sends Warship Near Artificial Island Chain

New York Times - 30 minutes ago
Photo
A satellite image from March showed work on an emerging artificial island at Mischief Reef, part of the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea. China has been turning submerged reefs into islands to bolster its territorial claims. Credit Center for Strategic International Studies, via Digital Globe
WASHINGTON — A United States naval destroyer was approaching waters near the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea late Monday, the Pentagon said, directly challenging China’s claims that the artificial island chain is within its territorial borders.
The Lassen, a guided missile destroyer, was preparing to sail within 12 nautical miles of the islands, making a long-anticipated entry into the disputed waters, officials said. American officials did not inform their Chinese counterparts as they planned the provocative maneuver, saying that to do so would have undercut their message.
“You don’t need to consult with any nation when you are exercising the right of freedom of navigation in international waters,” John Kirby, the State Department spokesman, said at a news conference.
Mr. Kirby said that such a challenge to what he called a questionable sovereignty claim was “one of the reasons you have a navy — to be able to exert influence and defend freedom of navigation on international waters.”
Continue reading the main story

Interactive Feature: What China Has Been Building in the South China Sea

China has been reclaiming land in the South China and East China Seas for several years, and the projects in the vicinity of the Spratlys have come under increasing criticism from the United States and its regional allies, including the Philippines. The United States and several Asian nations dispute the legitimacy of the islands built by China.
The Obama administration did not make an immediate announcement of the naval maneuver, and Pentagon officials would only confirm that it was planned, as they had forecast weeks ago.
The White House declined to share any details about the operation, referring questions to the Defense Department. But Josh Earnest, the press secretary, noted that President Obama had stood next to President Xi Jinping of China at a Rose Garden news conference last month and said that the United States would operate, fly or sail anywhere that international law allowed.
Continue reading the main story
TAIWAN
CHINA
Hong Kong
Pacific Ocean
Gulf of
Tonkin
South China Sea
PHILIPPINES
Paracel Islands
The Nine Dashes
China’s historical
territorial claim
LAOS
Manila
CAMBODIA
Claimed by
the Philippines
VIETNAM
Fiery Cross
Reef
Spratly
Islands
MALAYSIA
BRUNEI
200 Miles
INDONESIA
“That certainly includes the ability of our Navy to operate in international waters,” Mr. Earnest said. “This is a critically important principle, particularly in the South China Sea, because there are billions of dollars of commerce that flow through that region of the world every year — maybe even more than that — and ensuring the free flow of this commerce, and that freedom of navigation of those vessels is protected, is critically important to the global economy.”
American officials had said for the last month that the Navy would send a surface ship inside the waters claimed by China, a vow widely viewed as a signal to the Chinese that most of the rest of the world does not recognize its claim on the island chain. Mr. Obama approved the move this month, administration officials said.
The president signaled the Navy maneuver last month at the annual meeting of the United Nations General Assembly, when he said that the United States had an “interest in upholding the basic principles of freedom of navigation and the free flow of commerce and in resolving disputes through international law, not the law of force.”
Continue reading the main story Video

Obama: land reclamation projects in S. China Sea 'counterproductive'

U.S. President Obama says land reclamation projects in the South China Sea are unproductive and calls for an end to aggressive action in the region. Rough Cut (no reporter narration).
By Reuters on Publish Date June 1, 2015. Photo by Reuters. Watch in Times Video »
Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter has said repeatedly that the United States military will operate where international law allows.
China, in what some Asia analysts interpreted as a gesture to pre-empt the American naval maneuver, sent warships into United States territorial waters in August. Five Chinese ships came within 12 miles of the coast of Alaska while Mr. Obama was visiting the state.
But American military officials said that the two maneuvers were not comparable, citing international maritime laws that allow passage such as the Chinese transit near Alaska if there was no other passageway for a ship to reach its destination.
Continue reading the main story

Today’s Headlines: Asia Edition

Get news and analysis from Asia and around the world delivered to your inbox every day in the Asian morning.
In the case of the Spratly Islands, one American military official said, there were several other routes that the United States destroyer could have used, but the military deliberately chose to enter the waters that China claims as its territory.
In recent years, China has been claiming large parts of the strategic waterway by enlarging rocks and submerged reefs into islands big enough for military airstrips, radar equipment and lodging for soldiers, American officials said.
Although China claims much of the South China Sea as sovereign territory, the 12-mile zone around the new islands is particularly delicate because international law says that artificial islands do not have sovereign rights up to the 12-mile limit.
The United States has not traveled close to the Chinese-occupied islands in the South China Sea since at least 2012. In May, a United States Navy surveillance plane flew near three of China’s five artificial islands but did not go within the 12-mile zones. Chinese Navy radio operators warned the Americans to leave the area.
 

No comments: