Monday, January 16, 2017

Further information: 2016 United States election interference by Russia § Briefing on alleged Trump dossier


begin quote from:
Further information: 2016 United States election interference by Russia § Briefing on alleged Trump dossier
Page semi-protected

2016 United States election interference by Russia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
ODNI Statement on Declassified Intelligence Community Assessment of Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent U.S. Elections
The United States government has accused the Russian government of interfering in the 2016 United States elections.[1] Following a British intelligence tip-off,[2][3] a joint US intelligence review stated, "Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Hillary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency."[4] Further, the US intelligence community stated "Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump."[5] Their assessment was made with high confidence. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), representing 17 intelligence agencies, and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) jointly stated that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and leaked its documents to WikiLeaks.[6][7][8] Russia said it had no involvement.[9] Wikileaks founder Julian Assange said that Russia was not involved in the leaks.[9][10][11] Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper in early January 2017 testified before a Senate committee that Russia’s alleged meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign went beyond hacking, and included disinformation and the dissemination of fake news often promoted on social media.[12]
President Barack Obama used the red phone line to directly contact Vladimir Putin and emphasize the importance of the cyber attacks.[13] U.S. intelligence agencies said they had high confidence that Russia acted to favor the election of Donald Trump,[14][15] and that Putin "personally directed" the operation.[16][17] Russia disputed Putin's involvement.[17] CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey and DNI James R. Clapper agreed on the "scope, nature and intent" of Russia's alleged interference to assist Trump.[18][19][20] Cybersecurity firms, including CrowdStrike, Fidelis Cybersecurity, Mandiant and ThreatConnect stated that the cyberattacks were committed by Russian intelligence groups Fancy Bear and Cozy Bear.[21][22]
President Obama ordered a report on foreign interventions in elections.[23][24][25] U.S. senators called for a bipartisan investigation.[26][27] President-elect Trump rejected the report, saying that Democrats were reacting to their election loss,[28][29] and attacked the intelligence agencies in a transition team statement.[30][31] Senate Majority Leader Republican Mitch McConnell expressed confidence in U.S. intelligence and supported a bipartisan investigation,[32][33] as did the Senate Intelligence Committee.[34] In December 2016, President Obama promised retaliation against Russia[35][36] and on December 29 the U.S. expelled 35 Russian diplomats and broadened sanctions on Russian entities and individuals.[37]

Contents

Background

See also: Russia–United States relations § Obama's tenure (2009–2017)

Hostility between Putin and Clinton

See also: 2011–13 Russian protests § Reactions
Russians protest against Putin's re-election in 2012. Putin accused Secretary of State Clinton of inciting 2011–13 Russian protests.[38]
Russian President Vladimir Putin repeatedly accused Hillary Clinton, who served as U.S. Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013, of interfering in Russia’s internal affairs,[39] and Clinton accused Putin of having a personal grudge against her.[40] Michael McFaul, who was U.S. ambassador to Russia, said that "[Putin] was very upset [with Clinton] and continued to be for the rest of the time that I was in government. One could speculate that this is his moment for payback."[41] NBC News reported: "Several former Obama administration officials said that when Clinton was secretary of state, she was by far the most aggressive and outspoken U.S. official when it came to countering Putin's efforts to consolidate his power domestically, and to expand his sphere of influence in the region and beyond. And when she left government, they say, Clinton became even more combative".[42]
According to Russian security expert and investigative journalist Andrei Soldatov, one of the reasons Russia would try to sway the US presidential election is that the Russian government considers Clinton "a hater of Russia": "There is this mentality in Russia of being besieged; that it is always under attack from the United States. ...They are trying to interfere in our internal affairs so why not try to do the same thing to them?"[43]

Democratic National Committee email leak

Image of Debbie Wasserman Schultz speaking at Democratic national Convention.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigned as DNC chairwoman following WikiLeaks releases suggesting collusion against Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign.[44]
See also: Democratic National Committee cyber attacks and 2016 Democratic National Committee email leak
On July 22, 2016, WikiLeaks released approximately 20,000 emails sent from or received by Democratic National Committee (DNC) personnel.[45] On October 7, 2016, WikiLeaks started releasing series of emails and documents sent from or received by Hillary Clinton campaign manager John Podesta.[46]

Internet Research Agency

See also: Trolls from Olgino and Web brigades
An aerial view of the Smolny Convent in Saint Petersburg
An alleged Russian propaganda "troll farm" was traced back to Saint Petersburg.[47]
In July 2016, The New Yorker writer Adrian Chen wrote that a Russian group called the Internet Research Agency might be using fake social media accounts to promote U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump.[48] Chen wrote that the connection between Trump and Russia was not straightforward, with evidence both for and against it.[48]

Counter-Disinformation Team scrapped pre-election

The International Business Times reported that the United States Department of State planned to use a unit formed with the intention of combating disinformation from the Russian government, and that it was disbanded in September 2015 after department heads missed the scope of propaganda before the 2016 U.S. election.[49] The unit had been in development for 8 months prior to being scrapped.[49] Titled the Counter-Disinformation Team, it would have been a reboot of the Active Measures Working Group set up by the Reagan Administration.[50][51] It was created under the Bureau of International Information Programs.[50][51] Work began in 2014, with the intention of countering propaganda from Russian sources such as TV network RT (formerly called Russia Today).[50][51] A beta website was ready, and staff were hired by the U.S. State Department for the unit prior to its cancellation.[50][51] U.S. Intelligence officials explained to former National Security Agency analyst and counterintelligence officer John R. Schindler that the Obama Administration decided to cancel the unit, as they were afraid of antagonizing Russia.[50][51] A State Department representative told the International Business Times after being contacted regarding the closure of the unit, that the U.S. was disturbed by propaganda from Russia, and the strongest defense was sincere communication.[49] U.S. Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy Richard Stengel was point person for the unit before it was canceled.[50][51] Stengel previously wrote about disinformation by RT.[52] After U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry called RT a Kremlin propaganda arm,[53] RT insisted that the State Department respond.[52][54] Stengel wrote that RT had engaged in a disinformation campaign.[52][54]

Russian trolls' support for Trump

In December 2015 Adrian Chen noticed pro-Russia Twitter accounts suddenly became supportive of Trump.
Andrew Weisburd and Foreign Policy Research Institute fellow and senior fellow at the Center for Cyber and Homeland Security at George Washington University, Clint Watts,[55] wrote for The Daily Beast in August 2016 that Russian propaganda fabricated articles were popularized by social media.[56] Weisburd and Watts documented how disinformation spread from government-controlled outlets, RT and Sputnik to pro-Russian accounts on Twitter.[56] Citing research by Chen, they compared Russian tactics during the 2016 U.S. election to Soviet Union Cold War strategies.[56] They referenced the 1992 United States Information Agency report to the U.S. Congress, which warned about Russian propaganda called active measures.[56] They wrote active measures were made easier with social media.[56] Institute of International Relations Prague senior fellow and scholar on Russian intelligence, Mark Galeotti, agreed the Kremlin operations were a form of active measures.[57] The Guardian reported in November 2016 the most strident Internet promoters of Trump were paid Russian propagandists, estimating several thousand trolls involved.[58]
Weisburd and Watts collaborated with colleague J. M. Berger and on November 6, 2016 published a follow-up to their Daily Beast article in online magazine War on the Rocks, titled: "Trolling for Trump: How Russia is Trying to Destroy Our Democracy".[55][59][60] They researched 7,000 pro-Trump social media accounts over a two-and-a-half year period.[59] Their research detailed trolling denigrating critics of Russian activities in Syria, and proliferating falsehoods about Clinton's health.[59] Watts said the propaganda targeted the alt-right movement, the right wing, and fascist groups.[55] BuzzFeed News reported Kremlin-financed trolls were open about spreading Russian disinformation.[61]
On November 24, 2016, The Washington Post reported the Foreign Policy Research Institute stated Russian propaganda exacerbated criticism of Clinton and support for Trump.[62][63][64] The strategy involved social media, paid Internet trolls, botnets, and websites denigrating Clinton.[62][63][64] Watts stated Russia's goal was to damage trust in the U.S.[62] Conclusions by Watts and colleagues Andrew Weisburd and J.M. Berger were confirmed by research from the Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University and by the RAND Corporation.[62]

Cybersecurity analysis

Cybersecurity experts and firms, including CrowdStrike,[65] Fidelis Cybersecurity, Mandiant, SecureWorks and ThreatConnect,[66] stated the leak of emails in the 2016 U.S. elections was part of a series of cyberattacks on the DNC committed by two Russian intelligence groups, called Fancy Bear and Cozy Bear.[21][22][67][68][69] The groups are also known respectively as APT28 and APT29.[70][Note 1] ThreatConnect also concluded that the DC Leaks project shows the hallmarks of Russian intelligence, matching the attack pattern of the GRU hacker group Fancy Bear.[72][73][74][75][76] Ars Technica IT editor Sean Gallagher wrote that there was no smoking gun for Russian hacking of the DNC, but that evidence pointed towards Russia.[77] Cybersecurity expert Jeffrey Carr, of Taia Global, criticized Crowdstrike's analysis of the DNC hack, and noted the difficulty of confirming attribution in cyberspace.[78] According to the Süddeutsche Zeitung, cybersecurity services may overstate their conclusions as a form of self-promotion.[79]

U.S. intelligence analysis

Director of National Intelligence, Homeland Security and CIA

October 2016 joint statement

Office of the Director of National Intelligence
United States Department of Homeland Security
Seals of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper said after the 2011–13 Russian protests, Putin's confidence in his viability as a politician was damaged, and Putin responded with the propaganda operation.[80] Former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) officer Patrick Skinner explained the goal was to spread uncertainty.[81] In July 2016, consensus grew within the CIA that Russia hacked the DNC.[82]
Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper
In a joint statement on October 7, 2016, the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued a statement on Russian influence on the 2016 U.S. presidential election.[6][7][8] The statement expressed confidence Russia interfered in the election by stealing emails from politicians and U.S. groups and publicizing the information.[83] By December 2, 2016, intelligence sources told CNN the U.S. Intelligence Community gained confidence Russia's efforts were aimed at helping Trump win the election.[84]

December 2016 CIA report

On December 9, the CIA told U.S. legislators the U.S. Intelligence Community concluded Russia conducted operations during the 2016 U.S. election to assist Donald Trump in winning the presidency.[85][86][87] Multiple U.S intelligence agencies concluded people with direct ties to the Kremlin gave WikiLeaks hacked emails from the DNC and sources such as John Podesta, campaign chairman for Hillary Clinton.[14][15][85] These intelligence organizations concluded Russia hacked the RNC as well as the DNC—and chose not to leak information obtained from the RNC.[23][23] This was based on evidence obtained before the election.[88] A senior U.S. official said this was the consensus of multiple intelligence agencies.[89] The CIA said the foreign intelligence agents were Russian operatives previously known to the U.S.[85] The CIA told U.S. Senators it was strongly apparent Russia's intentions were to help Trump.[86]

Vladimir Putin involvement

American intelligence officials have said Vladimir Putin personally controlled the alleged covert operation.[16][90][17][91][92]
NBC News reported two senior federal employees said post-election intelligence led officials to believe Vladimir Putin personally controlled the operation.[16][93][94] They said Putin's motives started as a feud against Hillary Clinton, and grew into a desire to foment global distrust of the U.S.[16][93][94] They said the operation needed approval by top Russian officials, as Putin maintained absolute control.[16][93][94] This assessment was echoed by officials to CBS News.[90] ABC News reported similar accounts from U.S. and foreign officials.[17][95] According to U.S. foreign and intelligence officials, the operation began with low-level Russian military, as an effort to penetrate computers belonging to Democratic and Republican politicians, and Putin became personally involved after Russia accessed the DNC.[17] Two senior officials told CNN the scale of the operation required support from the Russian government's top authority.[91] U.S. officials said that under Putin's direction, the goals evolved from criticizing American democracy to attacking Clinton.[92] U.S. officials further said that Putin's aims shifted to help elect Trump during 2016, as he felt the candidate would favor Russia with regards to U.S. financial sanctions.[92] A U.S. intelligence official said to Reuters that due to Putin's prior experience as an operative for the KGB, he maintained tighter control over Russian intelligence operations.[92]
Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes appeared on MSNBC on December 15, 2016 and agreed with this assessment, saying operations of this magnitude required Putin's consent.[92][96] White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest noted in a December 15 press conference that the U.S. Intelligence Community reached similar conclusions, and he quoted from the October 2016 joint-letter by the Director of National Intelligence and Department of Homeland Security, saying the operation required top-level Russian government approval.[96]

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Seal of the Federal Bureau of Investigation
In June 2016, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) notified the Illinois Republican Party in June that some of its email accounts may have been hacked.[97] On October 31, 2016, The New York Times stated that the FBI had been examining possible connections between Trump and Russia, but did not find a connection.[98] At the time FBI officials thought Russia was motivated to create chaos generally and not specifically elect Trump.[98] An unnamed official disputed the RNC servers were hacked, and stated that Russian attempts to access the RNC server were unsuccessful.[23] In a December 11, 2016 interview with George Stephanopoulos of ABC News, RNC chair Reince Priebus stated they communicated with the FBI when they learned about hacking of the DNC, and after a review it was determined their servers were secure.[99] During a House Intelligence Committee hearing, the FBI said they were unclear as to motive.[100]
On December 16, 2016, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency John O. Brennan stated the FBI and Director of National Intelligence supported the CIA's conclusion that the Russian government interfered in the U.S. elections in 2016 with the motive of assisting Donald Trump in securing the White House, and attacking U.S. democratic values.[18][19][20] Brennan sent a letter to his staff saying he held a meeting with Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation James Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper, and that all were in agreement about these conclusions.[18][19][20] Brennan's letter stated: "Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election."[18][19][20] Brennan said the FBI, CIA, and DNI all acknowledged the importance of working together to complete the president's order to investigate.[18]

December 2016 Joint Analysis Report

On December 29, 2016 the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released a Joint Analysis Report titled "GRIZZLY STEPPE – Russian Malicious Cyber Activity".[71] It gave new technical details regarding methods used by Russian intelligence services for affecting the U.S. election, government, political organizations and private sector.[101][102]
The report included malware samples and other technical details as evidence that the Russian government had hacked the Democratic National Committee.[103] Alongside the report, DHS "released an extensive list of Internet Protocol addresses, computer files, malware code and other 'signatures' that it said the Russian hackers have used."[101]
An article in the Süddeutsche Zeitung discussed the difficulty of proof in matters of cybersecurity. Multiple security experts told the paper that evidence provided by the Joint Analysis Report was weak, and did not provide proof of Russian culpability. One analyst told the Süddeutsche Zeitung that US intelligence services could be keeping some information secret to protect their sources and analysis methods. It also notes that the comments of some providers of cybersecurity services may be overstated due to self-promotion.[79] An article in Ars Technica cited some cybersecurity commentators who expressed concerns about the report.[104] ZDNet noted that the PHP malware included in the JAR is "an out-of-date, web-shell hacking tool," which—according to Rob Graham, CEO of Errata Security—is "used by hundreds if not thousands of hackers, mostly associated with Russia, but also throughout the rest of the world."[105] Other experts cited by Fortune called the Grizzly Steppe report “poorly done” and “fatally flawed,”.[106]
Kevin Poulsen, writing for The Daily Beast, stated that while there is a "ton of" solid evidence of Russia's interference, the incompleteness of the report encouraged "Trump-friendly conspiracy theorists" - despite years of cybersecurity industry research that invalidates their claims.[107] According to The Daily Beast, the report "was widely criticized by cybersecurity experts for being little more than a hodge-podge of random Internet Protocol addresses and code names for hacker gangs suspected of having ties to Moscow."[108] Journalist Matt Taibbi called the report “an element of salesmanship.”[109]

January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment

On January 6, 2017, after briefing the president, the president-elect, and members of the Senate and House, US intelligence agencies released a de-classified version[110] of the report on Russian activities. The report asserted that Russia had carried out a massive cyber operation on orders by Russian President Putin with the goal to sabotage the 2016 US elections. The agencies concluded that Putin and the Russian government tried to help Trump win the election by discrediting Hillary Clinton and portraying her negatively relative to Trump, and that Russia had conducted a multipronged cyber campaign consisting of hacking and the extensive use of social media and trolls, as well as open propaganda on Russian-controlled news platforms.[111] A large part of the report was dedicated to criticizing Russian TV channel RT America, which it described as a "messaging tool" for the Kremlin.[112]
On January 10, 2017, FBI Director James Comey told the Senate Intelligence Committee that FBI "did not develop any evidence that the Trump campaign or the current RNC was successfully hacked."[113]

Dossier about alleged Russian connections

Main article: Donald Trump Russia dossier
On October 31, 2016, a week before the election, David Corn of Mother Jones magazine, reported that a former intelligence officer, whom they did not name, had produced a report based on Russian sources and turned it over to the FBI.[114] David Corn detailed "three big points" in the report:
"...that Moscow had tried to cultivate Donald Trump; that it had gathered compromising intelligence on him; and that there had also been a flow of information, of intelligence, between the Trump camp and the Kremlin."[115]
The report alleged that the Russian government had cultivated Trump for years:
The "Russian regime has been cultivating, supporting and assisting TRUMP for at least 5 years. Aim, endorsed by PUTIN, has been to encourage splits and divisions in western alliance." It maintained that Trump "and his inner circle have accepted a regular flow of intelligence from the Kremlin, including on his Democratic and other political rivals." It claimed that Russian intelligence had "compromised" Trump during his visits to Moscow and could "blackmail him."[114]
The report further claimed that there were multiple in-person meetings between Russian government officials and individuals established as working for Trump.[116][117] The former intelligence officer continued to share information with the FBI, and said in October 2016 that "there was or is a pretty substantial inquiry going on."[114] In January 2017, the officer's identity was revealed.[118]
On January 10, 2017, CNN reported that classified documents presented to Obama and Trump the previous week included allegations that Russian operatives possess "compromising personal and financial information" about Trump. CNN stated that it would not publish specific details on the memos because they had not yet "independently corroborated the specific allegations."[119][120] Following the report,[121] BuzzFeed published a 35-page dossier that it said was the basis of the briefing, including unverified claims that operatives had collected "embarrassing material" involving Trump that could be used to blackmail him.[122][123][120][124] A senior U.S. intelligence official disputed CNN's claim that Trump had been previously briefed on the contents of the memos.[125] Contrary to the official's claim, Clapper released a statement which suggested "that CNN's original report was correct."[126]
During a press conference on January 11, 2017, Trump denounced the unsubstantiated claims as false, saying that it was "disgraceful" for U.S. intelligence agencies to report them. He refused to answer a question from CNN's senior White House correspondent Jim Acosta, arguing that the network was disseminating fake news. CNN defended how it had reported the story, arguing that it had published "carefully sourced reporting" on the matter which had been "matched by the other major news organizations," as opposed to BuzzFeed's posting of "unsubstantiated materials."[127][121] James Clapper described the leaks as damaging to US national security but his statement also confirmed the original report by CNN.[126] This also contradicted Trump's previous claim that Clapper said the information was false; Clapper's statement actually said the intelligence community has made no judgement on the truth or falsity of the information.[128]
Christopher David Steele has been named as the source of the material. Steele formerly worked for the British intelligence agency MI6 and is co-founder of London-based Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd.[129][130] Steele joined the British Secret Intelligence Service following his graduation from Cambridge University in 1986.[131] According to reports, Orbis was retained by FusionGPS, a Washington D.C. political intelligence firm, and initially funded by Never Trump Republicans and later by Democrats.[118][132]
Senator John McCain obtained the documents in December 2016 and turned them over to the FBI.[132] He provided the material directly to FBI director Comey after a meeting with Sir Andrew Wood who stated that Steele was a professional with integrity.[118]

Government response

U.S. Senate

U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Republican Senator John McCain and Senate Minority Leader Democrat Chuck Schumer planned a bipartisan investigation.
McCain, Graham, Schumer, Reed Joint Statement on Reports That Russia Interfered with the 2016 Election
Members of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee traveled to Ukraine and Poland in 2016 and learned about Russian operations to influence their elections.[133] U.S. Senator Angus King said tactics used by Russia during the 2016 U.S. election were analogous to those used against other countries.[133] King said the problem frustrated both political parties.[134] On November 30, 2016, seven members of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee asked President Obama to declassify and publicize more information on Russia's role in the U.S. election.[133][135] Representatives in the U.S. Congress took action to monitor the national security of the United States by advancing legislation to monitor propaganda.[136][137] On November 30, 2016, legislators approved a measure within the National Defense Authorization Act to ask the U.S. State Department act against propaganda with an inter-agency panel.[136][137] The initiative was developed through a bipartisan bill, the Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act, written by U.S. Senators Republican Rob Portman and Democrat Chris Murphy.[136] U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee member Ron Wyden said frustration over covert Russian propaganda was bipartisan.[136]
Republican U.S. Senators stated they planned to hold hearings and investigate Russian influence on the 2016 U.S. elections.[138] By doing so they went against the preference of incoming Republican President-elect Trump, who downplayed Russian interference.[138] U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain and U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr planned investigations of Russian cyberwarfare.[138] U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker planned a 2017 investigation.[138] Senator Lindsey Graham indicated he would conduct an investigation in the 115th Congress.[138] On December 11, 2016, top-ranking bipartisan members of the U.S. Senate issued a joint statement together on December 11, 2016 responding to the intelligence assessments Russia influenced the election.[26][27] The two Republican signers were Senators Graham and McCain, both members of the Armed Services Committee; the two Democratic signers were incoming Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, and Senator Jack Reed, the ranking member of the Armed Services Committee.[139][140][141] They said Russian interference was deeply troubling and a bipartisan concern.[142]
In a response to Trump's disregard for the U.S. intelligence assessments on Russia, Republican Senator John McCain said: "The facts are there."[143] Senator McCain called for a special select committee of the U.S. Senate to investigate Russian meddling in the election.[144] Republican Senator and Intelligence Committee member James Lankford agreed looking into Russian influence on the elections should be cooperative between parties.[145] According to McCain, Russia's meddling in the election was an "act of war."[146] Republican Senator Susan Collins said a bipartisan investigation should improve proactive cyber defence.[147] Outgoing Senate Democratic Caucus leader Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid said the FBI covered up information about Russian interference in a bid to swing the election for Trump. Reid accused FBI Director James Comey of partisanship, and called for his resignation.[148]
On December 12, 2016, Senate Majority Leader Republican Mitch McConnell disagreed with Trump and expressed confidence in U.S. intelligence.[32] McConnell added that investigation of Russia's actions "should not be a partisan issue" and said that it "defies belief" that some members of the Republican Party would not want such an investigation.[33] McConnell announced the Senate intelligence panel would conduct an investigation into Russian interference.[149]
Senate hearing on Russian hacking and US cybersecurity
Joint Statement on Committee Inquiry into Russian Intelligence Activities
In a joint bipartisan letter issued on December 18, Senators McCain, Graham, Schumer, and Reed urged McConnell to create a new, select committee to undertake a "comprehensive investigation of Russian interference" and develop "comprehensive recommendations and, as necessary, new legislation to modernize our nation’s laws, governmental organization, and related practices to meet this challenge."[150] McConnell, by contrast, has thus far held that the Senate Intelligence Committee is "more than capable of conducting a complete review" and that creating a select committee was unnecessary.[150]
In a December 14, 2016 interview with Wolf Blitzer on CNN, Senator Lindsey Graham said Russians hacked into his Senate campaign email.[151][152] Graham said the FBI contacted his campaign in August 2016 to notify them of the breach in security which occurred in June to his campaign vendor.[151][152] On December 15, 2016, Senator Graham stated in order for Trump's nominee for United States Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, to earn his confirmation vote, Tillerson would need to acknowledge his belief Russia interfered in the 2016 elections.[153] On December 16, 2016, U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr said he supported the U.S. intelligence community conclusions.[19] Burr stated intelligence employees working for the U.S. are diverse and hold varied political views.[19] The U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee issued a release emphasizing they earnestly took into consideration the fact that both the Senate Majority and Minority Leaders were in agreement a bipartisan investigation should take place.[34]

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Representative Adam Schiff, Ranking Member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, commented on Putin's aims, and said U.S. intelligence agencies were concerned with Russian propaganda.[80] Speaking about disinformation that appeared in Hungary, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, and Poland, Schiff said there was an increase of the same behavior in the U.S.[80] Schiff concluded Russian propaganda operations would continue against the U.S. after the election.[80] He put forth a recommendation for a combined House and Senate investigation similar to the Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities before and after the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001.[154]
Republican U.S. Speaker of the House Paul Ryan said external interference in U.S. elections was intolerable.[155] Ryan said an investigation should be conducted by U.S. House Intelligence Committee chairman Representative Devin Nunes, and stated interference from Russia was troubling due to Putin's activities against the U.S.[156] On December 12, 2016, Nunes emphasized that at the time he had only viewed circumstantial evidence Russia intended to assist Trump win.[157] On December 14, Nunes requested a formal briefing gain more information about assertions officials had revealed to the media; the DNI refused, citing the ongoing review ordered by President Obama.[158]

Obama administration

President Obama ordered the United States Intelligence Community to investigate Russian attempts to influence the election and report back by January 2017.[159]
President Obama and Vladimir Putin had a discussion about computer security issues in September 2016, which took place over the course of an hour and a half.[35] During the discussion, which took place as a side segment during the then-ongoing G20 summit in China, Obama made his views known on cyber security matters between the U.S. and Russia.[35] Obama said Russian hacking stopped after his warning to Putin.[160] One month after that discussion the email leaks from the DNC cyber attack had not ceased, and President Obama decided to contact Putin on the Moscow–Washington hotline, commonly known as the "red phone".[13] During this discussion which took place on October 31, 2016, President Obama utilized the phrase "armed conflict" to emphasize the gravity of the situation.[13] He told Putin: "International law, including the law for armed conflict, applies to actions in cyberspace. We will hold Russia to those standards."[13] A representative for the White House confirmed to NBC News that the red phone line was utilized to contact the Kremlin directly on October 31, 2016.[13]
On December 9, 2016, President Obama ordered the U.S. Intelligence Community to investigate Russian interference in the election and report before he leaves office on January 20, 2017.[24][25] U.S. Homeland Security Advisor and chief counterterrorism advisor to the president Lisa Monaco announced the study, and said foreign intrusion into a U.S. election was unprecedented and would necessitate investigation by subsequent administrations.[159] The intelligence analysis would cover malicious cyberwarfare occurring between the 2008 and 2016 elections. [161][162] A senior administration official told CNN the White House was confident Russia interfered in the election.[163] The official said the ordered by President Obama would be a lessons learned report, with options including sanctions and covert cyber response against Russia.[163]
On December 12, 2016, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest was critical of Trump's rejection of the idea that Russia used cyber-attacks to influence the election.[164] Earnest contrasted Trump's comments on Twitter with the October 2016 conclusions of the U.S. Intelligence community.[164] At a subsequent White House press conference on December 15, Earnest said Trump and the public were aware prior to the 2016 election of Russian interference efforts, calling these undisputed facts.[96] United States Secretary of State John Kerry spoke on December 15, 2016, about President Obama's decision to approve the October 2016 joint statement by the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.[92] Kerry stated the president's decision was deliberative and relied upon information cautiously weighed by the intelligence agencies.[92] He said the president felt a need to warn the U.S. public and did.[92]
President Obama was interviewed about the Russian covert operation on December 15, 2016 in an interview with National Public Radio journalist Steve Inskeep for the next day's Morning Edition program.[35] Obama said the U.S. government would respond in overt and covert methods.[35] The president said the government would be better able to speak to motive behind the Russian operation after the intelligence report he ordered was completed.[35] Obama emphasized Russian efforts caused more harm to Clinton than Trump during the campaign.[35] At a press conference the following day, President Obama highlighted his September 2016 admonition to Putin to cease engaging in cyberwarfare against the U.S.[36] Obama explained the U.S. did not publicly reciprocate against Russia's actions due to a fear such choices would appear partisan.[36] He said the U.S. would respond in order to send an unambiguous symbol to the world there were harsh consequences for such interference.[36] President Obama minimized conflict between his administration and the Trump transition, stressing cyber warfare against the U.S. should be a bipartisan issue.[165]

Sanctions imposed on Russia

See also: International sanctions during the Ukrainian crisis
Executive Order 13694
Executive Order 13694
On December 29, 2016, the U.S. government announced a series of punitive measures against Russia that were said to be "the biggest retaliatory move against Russian espionage since the Cold War" and "the strongest American response yet to a state-sponsored cyberattack".[166][167] Namely, the Obama administration imposed sanctions on four top officials of the GRU and declared 35 Russian suspected spies[168][Note 2] in the United States persona non grata and ordered them to leave the country within 72 hours, and announced further sanctions, some of which may not be disclosed to the public.[103][170][171] The United States Department of State also announced the closure of two waterfront compounds used by Russian intelligence agents, one in Upper Brookville, New York, on Long Island, and the other in Centreville, Maryland, on the Eastern Shore.[167][172][173] A White House statement said that "Russia's cyberactivities were intended to influence the election, erode faith in US democratic institutions, sow doubt about the integrity of our electoral process, and undermine confidence in the institutions of the US government."[174] President Obama said "these actions follow repeated private and public warnings that we have issued to the Russian government, and are a necessary and appropriate response to efforts to harm US interests in violation of established international norms of behavior."[175]
On December 30, two compounds in Maryland and New York which had served as luxury retreats for various Russian diplomats in the previous decades were shut down on orders of the US government.[176]

Russian response to sanctions

Russian president Vladimir Putin released a statement that his country would not "stoop to the level of the so-called ‘catfight'" and expel US diplomats due to "unfriendly actions by the outgoing US administration", and invited 35 American diplomats in Moscow and their families to New Year's and Christmas celebrations at the Kremlin.[177] He further stated that while Russia reserved the right to respond at a future time, "further steps towards the restoration of Russian-American relations will be built on the basis of the policy which the administration of President D. Trump will carry out". Soon afterwards, Trump released a statement on Twitter saying, "Great move on delay (by V. Putin) — I always knew he was very smart!"[178]

Commentary and reactions

Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton said Vladimir Putin held a grudge against her due to her criticism of the 2011 Russian legislative election.[34]
Hillary Clinton appeared on December 15, 2016 at the Plaza Hotel in Midtown Manhattan, New York City and gave a gratitude speech to her campaign donors in which she reflected on Putin's motivations for the covert operation.[179] She partially attributed her loss in the 2016 election to Russian meddling organized by Putin.[180] Clinton said Putin had a personal grudge against her, and linked his feelings to her criticism of the 2011 Russian legislative election and that he felt she was responsible for fomenting the 2011–13 Russian protests.[34] She drew a specific connection from her 2011 assertions as U.S. Secretary of State in 2011 that Putin rigged the elections that year, to his actions in the 2016 U.S. elections.[179] Clinton said that by personally attacking her through meddling in the election Putin additionally took a strike at the American democratic system.[180] She said the cyber warfare was a larger issue than herself personally, and called them an attempt to attack the national security of the United States.[34] Clinton noted she was unsuccessful in sufficiently publicizing to the media the cyber attacks against her campaign in the months leading up to the election.[179] She voiced her support for a proposal put forth by U.S. Senators from both parties, to set up an investigative panel to look into the matter akin to the 9/11 Commission.[179]

Republican National Committee

The RNC said there was no intrusion into its servers, while acknowledging email accounts of individual Republicans (including Colin Powell) were breached. Over 200 emails from Colin Powell were posted on the website DC Leaks.[23][181] Chief of staff-designate for Trump and outgoing RNC Chairman Reince Priebus appeared on Meet the Press on December 11, 2016, and discounted the CIA conclusions.[83] Priebus relayed the FBI investigated and found RNC servers had not been hacked.[99] When asked by Chuck Todd whether Russia interfered in the election, Priebus stated there had been no decisive document asserting Russian involvement — a statement rated "False" by the fact-checking website PolitiFact.com, who noted Priebus neglected conclusions from the Director of Intelligence and Department of Homeland Security from October 2016.[83]

Donald Trump

Trump's transition team dismissed the CIA conclusions
Prior to his presidential run, Donald Trump made statements to Fox News in 2014 in which he agreed with an assessment by FBI director James Comey about hacking against the US by Russia and China.[182] Trump was played a clip of Comey from 60 Minutes discussing the dangers of cyber attacks.[182] Trump stated he agreed with the problem of cyber threats posed by China, and went on to emphasize there was a similar problem towards the US posed by Russia: "No, I think he's 100% right, it's a big problem, and we have that problem also with Russia. You saw that over the weekend. Russia's doing the same thing."[182]
In September 2016, during the first presidential debate, Trump said he doubted whether anyone was aware who hacked the DNC, and disputed Russian interference.[183] During the second debate, Trump said there might not have been hacking at all, and questioned why accountability was placed on Russia.[184] After the election, Trump rejected the CIA analysis.[28][29] Trump's transition team offered an official statement drawing attention to prior inaccuracy at the CIA.[30][31] The statement said, regarding those at the CIA who concluded Russian interference in the election, "These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction."[23] The intelligence analysts involved in monitoring Russian activities are most likely different from those who assessed that Iraq had stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction.[185] Reacting to The Washington Post's reporting, Trump dismissed reports of Russia's interference, and calling them "ridiculous"; he placed blame on Democrats upset over election results for publicizing these reports.[186] In a Tweet, Trump cited Julian Assange's statement that "a 14-year-old kid could have hacked Podesta."[187]
Trump praised Putin for delaying any retaliatory measures against the United States by saying it was a "Great move on delay" and added "I always knew he was very smart!"[188]
Trump told The New York Times, referring to the Office of Personnel Management data breach in 2015: "China, relatively recently, hacked 20 million government names. How come nobody even talks about that? This is a political witch hunt."[189]
Trump press conference on January 11, 2017
On January 6, 2017, Trump released a statement after his meeting with members of U.S. intelligence agencies:
"While Russia, China, other countries, outside groups and people are consistently trying to break through the cyber infrastructure of our governmental institutions, businesses and organizations including the Democrat National Committee, there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election including the fact that there was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines."[190]
Two days later, Reince Priebus reported that Trump began to acknowledge Russia's role in the interference.[191] On January 11, 2017, Trump stated in a press conference that he thought that Russia was behind the hacking, though he also said it could have been another country.[192]

WikiLeaks

In July 2016, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said he had not seen evidence emails leaked from the DNC were traceable to Russia.[11] In November 2016, Assange said Russia was not the source of John Podesta's hacked emails published by Wikileaks.[10] On January 3, 2017, he said that a "14-year-old kid could have hacked Podesta’s emails.[193]
In early January 2017, mass media reported that the findings contained in a secret briefing document U.S. intelligence agencies had given to president Barack Obama on January 5 identified the Russians who, according to these findings, provided hacked e-mails to WikiLeaks in an effort to influence the presidential election.[194] According to the Reuters report, hacked material in some cases followed "a circuitous route" from Russia's military intelligence agency (GRU) to WikiLeaks that enabled WikiLeaks to say the Russian government was not the source of the material published on its website.[194][195]

Russian government

Foreign Minister of Russia Sergei Lavrov said Russia did not interfere in the U.S. election.[196]
The Russian government said it had no involvement.[9] In a statement given to Reuters in Moscow, Dmitry Peskov, representative for Russian president Vladimir Putin, said there was no likelihood Russia or its governmental organizations participated.[9] Sergei Lavrov, Foreign Minister of Russia, rejected reports of Russian involvement in the 2016 U.S. elections.[196] When ABC News reported that Putin was directly involved in the covert operation, his representative referred to these accounts as "nonsense",[17] and Peskov said such reports were "rubbish".[197] Reuters reported Sergei Lavrov appeared on government television station Rossiya-24 to speak about assertions Putin directed the election interference.[92] Lavrov was shocked by the first reporting on the development by NBC News, and called such assertions "silly".[92] On December 16, 2016, Peskov called on the U.S. government to cease discussion of the topic unless it provides evidence to back up the assertions of Russian interference during the election.[198] According to The New Yorker, while "Russian officials on all levels have denied the hacking allegations," they have also justified them.[199]

Electoral College

On December 10, ten electors, headed by Christine Pelosi, wrote an open letter to the Director of National Intelligence James Clapper demanding an intelligence briefing on investigations into foreign intervention in the presidential election.[200][201] Fifty-eight additional electors subsequently added their names to the letter,[201] bringing the total to 68 electors from 17 different states.[202] The Clinton campaign supported the call for a classified briefing for electors, with John Podesta saying: "Electors have a solemn responsibility under the Constitution and we support their efforts to have their questions addressed."[203]

Intelligence community

Current members

The CIA assessment, and Trump's dismissal of it, created an immediate and unprecedented rupture between the president-elect and the intelligence community.[204][205][206] On December 11, 2016, U.S. intelligence officials responded to Trump's denunciation of its findings in a written statement, and expressed dismay Trump disputed their conclusions as politically motivated or inaccurate. They wrote intelligence officials were motivated to defend U.S. national security.[204] On the same day, The Guardian reported that members of the intelligence community feared reprisals from Donald Trump once he takes office, in response to the reports that have been issued. Serving officers pointed to Trump's attempts to identify civil servants in the Department of Energy that had participated in symposiums on climate change as a parallel example. Other serving officers stated that retaliation by Trump was a near certainty.[207]

Former members

Former CIA director Michael Morell said foreign interference in U.S. elections was an existential threat and called it the "political equivalent" of the September 11 attacks.[208] In a Washington Post op-ed, former NSA director and CIA director Michael V. Hayden wrote that Trump's attack on the Intelligence Community's findings diminished the chances that the incoming administration would use intelligence for logical policy-making decisions.[209] Former CIA spokesman George E. Little condemned Trump for dismissing the CIA assessment, saying that the president-elect's atypical response was disgraceful and denigrated the courage of those who serve in the CIA at risk to their own lives.[210] Another former CIA spokesman, Bill Harlow, said that the dispute between Trump and the CIA was a hideous development and unheard of to occur publicly.[205]
Independent presidential candidate and former CIA intelligence officer Evan McMullin said Republican leadership did not respond adequately during the 2016 election to their knowledge at the time about Russia's efforts to meddle in the process.[211] McMullin said Republican politicians were aware the publicly revealed information about Russia's interference was likely simply the tip of the iceberg relative to the actual threat.[211] McMullin said that with his experience having worked as an intelligence officer he was distressed by the CIA revelations.[211] He said Republicans had not acted on the issue sufficiently during the election because they placed importance of the Republican party over U.S. national concerns.[211]
William Binney, a former high-ranking official in the NSA, has expressed doubt about reports of Russian involvement in the DNC leaks. In Harper's Magazine, he told Andrew Cockburn, "Saying it does not make it true [...] They have to provide proof....So let’s see the evidence."[78] Writing in the Baltimore Sun, William Binney and Ray McGovern criticized the report published by the FBI and DHS on December 29, commenting that it "fell embarrassingly short" of the goal of proving Russian hacking.[212] Binney and McGovern wrote that given Director of National Intelligence James Clapper's false testimony to Congress over NSA surveillance of Americans, and his involvement in building the WMD case against Iraq, skepticism about his claims of Russian hacking are warranted. Binney and McGovern proposed that the DNC emails were leaked by an insider, rather than hacked and exfiltrated by an outside group.[212]
Former Pentagon analyst Pierre Sprey compared the public reactions of U.S. intelligence officials to Cold War-era "threat inflation," the "art" of playing up the threat posed by the Soviet Union in order to justify larger defense budgets.[78] Former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter called the CIA's assessment — that Russia was involved in the DNC hacks and intended to tilt the election towards Trump — "flawed on several levels."[213] Ritter continued that "there is no direct evidence linking Russia to the hacks," and that the attribution to Russia rests on unverified assumptions made by German intelligence in a previous hacking case.[213]

Experts and scholars

Former U.S. ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul, director of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University, writing in The Washington Post, called the known facts about Russian interference in the election worrying and called for a full investigation to determine the facts that were still uncertain.[214]
Historian Robert S. McElvaine wrote that there should be significant upset over the CIA's conclusion of Russian interference, and called upon the Electoral College to adopt a Government of National Unity.[215]
Cybersecurity columnist, Joseph Steinberg, writing in Inc., stated an investigation into the possible hacking was warranted.[216] Steinberg questioned if the public had a right to know whether there was negligence on the part of the government in protecting voting infrastructure, and by the DNC in protecting its information systems.[216]
Jeremy Scahill and John Schwarz, writing for The Intercept, urged President Obama to declassify evidence of Russian hacking.[217]
Cybersecurity analyst and expert Jeffrey Carr wrote: "It is both foolish and baseless to claim, as CrowdStrike does, that X-Agent is used solely by the Russian government when the source code is there for anyone to find and use at will."[218]
Russian journalist Alexey Kovalev, who runs a website debunking Russian propaganda, said: "There are many legitimate reasons to criticise RT, but the report singles out the channel for all the wrong reasons. Covering protests and other social and political fissures is a perfectly legitimate media activity."[219]
According to Max Boot writing in USA Today, while "the intelligence community has made mistakes in the past" , in this "case, it is obvious the spies have such a high degree of proof — including, one suspects, electronic intercepts of conversations and human intelligence reports to go along with forensic investigation of the hacked computers — that there is no disputing their bottom line."[220]
Masha Gessen, a vocal critic of Putin, assessed the US intelligence report as "weak" and inconclusive on a Putin influence campaign to help Donald Trump.[221]

Public opinion

Several public opinion polls released after the publishing of the intelligence report found that many Americans view Russia as a threat to the United States. According to a Pew Research Center survey conducted January 4-9, "54% of adults say that Russia’s power and influence is a major threat to the U.S." [222] A Quinnipiac University poll conducted January 5-9 shows that 55% of respondents believed that Russia interfered in the election, while 36% believed it did not and 10% were undecided.[223] An Ipsos/Reuters poll conducted January 9-12 found that "82 percent of American adults, including 84 percent of Democrats and 82 percent of Republicans, described Russia as a general 'threat' to the United States." [224]

See also

Notes


  • APT is an acronym for Advanced Persistent Threat.[71]
    1. In 2001, the U.S. government expelled 51 Russian diplomats out of the country in retaliation for Moscow’s alleged recruitment of FBI special agent Robert Hanssen[169]

    References


    1. Chris Kahn (January 13, 2017). "After 2016 campaign, more Americans consider Russia a threat: Reuters/Ipsos poll". Reuters.

    Further reading

    External links

  • Ryan, Missy; Nakashima, Ellen; DeYoung, Karen (December 29, 2016). "Obama administration announces measures to punish Russia for 2016 election interference". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 30, 2016.
  • "UK intelligence gave US key tipoff about Russian hacking, report says". The Guardian. January 9, 2017.
  • "US concludes Vladimir Putin ordered campaign to influence US election 'after British intelligence tip-off'". The Telegraph. January 9, 2017.
  • "Intelligence Report on Russian Hacking". The New York Times. January 6, 2017. p. 11. Retrieved January 8, 2017.
  • Blake, Aaron. "The 11 most important lines from the new intelligence report on Russia's hacking". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 7, 2017.
  • Nakashima, Ellen. "U.S. government officially accuses Russia of hacking campaign to interfere with elections". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 7, 2016.
  • Ackerman, Spencer; Thielman, Sam. "US officially accuses Russia of hacking DNC and interfering with election". The Guardian. Retrieved October 7, 2016.
  • CNN, Evan Perez and Theodore Schleifer. "US accuses Russia of trying to interfere with 2016 election". CNN. Retrieved October 7, 2016.
  • Moscow denies Russian involvement in U.S. DNC hacking, Reuters (June 14, 2016).
  • "WikiLeaks' Assange denies Russia behind Podesta hack". Politico. November 3, 2016. Retrieved December 10, 2016.
  • Alex Johnson, WikiLeaks' Julian Assange: 'No Proof' Hacked DNC Emails Came From Russia, NBC News (July 25, 2016).
  • "Top U.S. intelligence official: Russia meddled in election by hacking, spreading of propaganda". The Washington Post. January 5, 2017.
  • Arkin, William M.; Dilanian, Ken; McFadden, Cynthia (December 19, 2016), "What Obama Said to Putin on the Red Phone About the Election Hack", NBC News, retrieved December 22, 2016
  • Entous, Adam; Nakashima, Ellen; Miller, Greg, "Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House", The Washington Post
  • David E. Sanger & Scott Shane, Russian Hackers Acted to Aid Trump in Election, U.S. Says, New York Times (December 9, 2016).
  • William M. Arkin, Ken Dilanian and Cynthia McFadden (December 14, 2016), U.S. Officials: Putin Personally Involved in U.S. Election Hack, NBC News, retrieved December 14, 2016
  • Brian Ross; Rhonda Schwartz; James Gordon Meek (December 15, 2016), "Officials: Master Spy Vladimir Putin Now Directly Linked to US Hacking", ABC News, retrieved December 15, 2016
  • Entous, Adam; Nakashima, Ellen (December 16, 2016), "FBI backs CIA view that Russia intervened to help Trump win election", The Washington Post, retrieved December 16, 2016
  • Lederman, Josh; Klapper, Bradley (December 16, 2016). "Official: FBI Backs CIA Conclusion on Russian Hacking Motive". ABC News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on December 17, 2016. Retrieved December 16, 2016.
  • Dilanian, Ken (December 16, 2016), "FBI Agrees with CIA Assessment That Russia Wanted to Help Trump", NBC News, retrieved December 16, 2016
  • Goodin, Dan. ""Guccifer" leak of DNC Trump research has a Russian's fingerprints on it". arstechnica. Retrieved June 16, 2016.
  • "DNC email leak: Russian hackers Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear behind breach". The Guardian. July 26, 2016.
  • Sanger, David E.; Shane, Scott (December 9, 2016). "Russian Hackers Acted to Aid Trump in Election, U.S. Says". The New York Times. Retrieved December 10, 2016.
  • Washington, Spencer Ackerman and David Smith (December 9, 2016). "Barack Obama orders 'full review' of possible Russian hacking in U.S. election". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved December 10, 2016.
  • CNN, Tal Kopan, Kevin Liptak and Jim Sciutto. "Obama orders review of Russian election-related hacking". CNN. Retrieved December 10, 2016.
  • Seung Min Kim; Burgess Everett (December 11, 2016), "Trump vs. Congress on Russian hacking", Politico
  • Levine, Sam (December 10, 2016). "Chuck Schumer Calls For Investigation Into Russian Interference In The Election". The Huffington Post. Retrieved December 10, 2016.
  • Eric Bradner, Trump on Russian hacking: 'I don't believe it', CNN (December 11, 2016).
  • Nicholas Fando, Trump Links C.I.A. Reports on Russia to Democrats’ Shame Over Election, New York Times (December 11, 2016).
  • Sanger, David E. (December 10, 2016). "Trump, Mocking Claim That Russia Hacked Election, at Odds with G.O.P.". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 10, 2016.
  • "Team Trump Mocks Suggestion of Russian Meddling in Election". Bloomberg.com. Retrieved December 10, 2016.
  • "McConnell, Differing With Trump, Says He Has 'Highest Confidence' In Intel Agencies". Retrieved December 12, 2016.
  • Rhodan, Maya. "Sen. Mitch McConnell: "The Russians are not our friends."". Retrieved December 12, 2016.
  • Keith, Tamara (December 16, 2016), "In Leaked Remarks, Hillary Clinton Explains Putin's 'Beef' With Her", National Public Radio, retrieved December 17, 2016
  • Detrow, Scott (December 15, 2016), "Obama On Russian Hacking: 'We Need To Take Action. And We Will'", National Public Radio, retrieved December 16, 2016
  • Shear, Michael D.; Landler, Mark (December 16, 2016), "Obama Says He Told Putin: 'Cut It Out' on Hacking", The New York Times, retrieved December 16, 2016
  • Lee, Carol E.; Sonne, Paul (December 30, 2016). "U.S. Sanctions Russia Over Election Hacking; Moscow Threatens to Retaliate" – via Wall Street Journal.
  • "Vladimir Putin accuses Hillary Clinton of encouraging Russian protests". The Guardian. December 8, 2011.
  • "The roots of the hostility between Putin and Clinton". The Washington Post. July 28, 2016.
  • "The top four reasons Vladimir Putin might have a grudge against Hillary Clinton". National Post. December 16, 2016.
  • "Why Putin hates Hillary". Politico. July 25, 2016.
  • "DNC Email Hack: Why Vladimir Putin Hates Hillary Clinton". NBC News. July 27, 2016.
  • "'Pro-Kremlin youth groups' could be behind DNC hack". Deutsche Welle. July 27, 2016.
  • "Leaked DNC emails reveal details of anti-Sanders sentiment". The Guardian. July 24, 2016.
  • "The 4 Most Damaging Emails From the DNC WikiLeaks Dump". ABC News. July 25, 2015.
  • "18 revelations from Wikileaks' hacked Clinton emails". BBC News. October 27, 2016.
  • "Trolls for hire: Why are Russians being paid to wreak havoc online?". CBC News. June 10, 2015.
  • Chen, Adrian (July 27, 2016), "The Real Paranoia-Inducing Purpose of Russian Hacks", The New Yorker, retrieved November 26, 2016
  • Porter, Tom (November 28, 2016), "How US and EU failings allowed Kremlin propaganda and fake news to spread through the West", International Business Times, retrieved November 29, 2016
  • Schindler, John R. (November 5, 2015), "Obama Fails to Fight Putin's Propaganda Machine", New York Observer, retrieved November 28, 2016
  • Schindler, John R. (November 26, 2016), "The Kremlin Didn't Sink Hillary—Obama Did", New York Observer, retrieved November 28, 2016
  • LoGiurato, Brett (April 29, 2014), "Russia's Propaganda Channel Just Got A Journalism Lesson From The US State Department", Business Insider, retrieved November 29, 2016
  • LoGiurato, Brett (April 25, 2014), "RT Is Very Upset With John Kerry For Blasting Them As Putin's 'Propaganda Bullhorn'", Business Insider, retrieved November 29, 2016
  • Stengel, Richard (April 29, 2014), "Russia Today's Disinformation Campaign", Dipnote, United States Department of State, retrieved November 28, 2016
  • Dougherty, Jill (December 2, 2016), The reality behind Russia's fake news, CNN, retrieved December 2, 2016
  • Weisburd, Andrew; Watts, Clint (August 6, 2016), "Trolls for Trump – How Russia Dominates Your Twitter Feed to Promote Lies (And, Trump, Too)", The Daily Beast, retrieved November 24, 2016
  • Ali Watkins; Sheera Frenkel (November 30, 2016), "Intel Officials Believe Russia Spreads Fake News", BuzzFeed News, retrieved December 1, 2016
  • Benedictus, Leo (November 6, 2016), "Invasion of the troll armies: from Russian Trump supporters to Turkish state stooges", The Guardian, retrieved December 2, 2016
  • "U.S. officials defend integrity of vote, despite hacking fears", WITN-TV, November 26, 2016, retrieved December 2, 2016
  • Andrew Weisburd; Clint Watts; JM Berger (November 6, 2016), "Trolling for Trump: How Russia is Trying to Destroy Our Democracy", War on the Rocks, retrieved December 6, 2016
  • Frenkel, Sheera (November 4, 2016), "US Officials Are More Worried About The Media Being Hacked Than The Ballot Box", BuzzFeed News, retrieved December 2, 2016
  • Timberg, Craig (November 24, 2016), "Russian propaganda effort helped spread 'fake news' during election, experts say", The Washington Post, retrieved November 25, 2016
  • "Russian propaganda effort likely behind flood of fake news that preceded election", PBS NewsHour, Associated Press, November 25, 2016, retrieved November 26, 2016
  • "Russian propaganda campaign reportedly spread 'fake news' during US election", Nine News, Agence France-Presse, November 26, 2016, retrieved November 26, 2016
  • Alperovitch, Dmitri (June 15, 2016). "Bears in the Midst: Intrusion into the Democratic National Committee". CrowdStrike. Retrieved December 24, 2016.
  • Links to the full series of ThreatConnect reports following the DNC Breach can be found at the beginning of the report Can a BEAR Fit Down a Rabbit Hole?.
  • Shieber, Jonathan; Conger, Kate. "Did Russian government hackers leak the DNC emails?". TechCrunch. Retrieved July 26, 2016.
  • "DNC email leak: Sanders calls for new leader as Clinton camp blames Russia". The Guardian. July 24, 2016.
  • "Wikileaks posts nearly 20,000 hacked DNC emails online". Providence Journal. July 22, 2016.
  • Murdock, Jason (November 30, 2016), "Russian hackers may disrupt Germany's 2017 election warns spy chief", International Business Times UK edition, retrieved December 1, 2016
  • U. S. Department of Homeland Security and Federal Bureau of Investigation (December 29, 2016). "GRIZZLY STEPPE – Russian Malicious Cyber Activity" (PDF). US-CERT. United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team. Retrieved January 2, 2017.
  • "Does a BEAR Leak in the Woods?". Threat Connect. August 12, 2016.
  • Riley, Michael (August 11, 2016). "Russian Hackers of DNC Said to Nab Secrets From NATO, Soros". Bloomberg.com. Bloomberg News. Retrieved August 30, 2016.
  • Meyer, Josh (August 27, 2016). "Experts: Same Russians hacked Olympic whistleblower, Democrats". nbcnews.com. NBC News. Retrieved August 30, 2016.
  • Paletta, Damian (August 15, 2016). "Democrats Brace for More Leaks From Hackers". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved August 30, 2016.
  • DuVall, Eric (August 13, 2016). "Suspected Russian hackers release lawmakers' personal information". upi.com. United Press International. Retrieved August 30, 2016.
  • GALLAGHER, SEAN. "RECAPPING THE FACTS — Did the Russians "hack" the election? A look at the established facts". ArsTechnica. Retrieved December 31, 2016.
  • Cockburn, Andrew (December 2016). "The New Red Scare: Reviving the art of threat inflation". Harper's Magazine. Retrieved January 4, 2017.
  • Brühl, Jannis; Tanriverdi, Hakan (December 30, 2016). "Viele Indizien gegen Russland, aber kaum Beweise". Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved January 1, 2017.
  • "Vladimir Putin Wins the Election No Matter Who The Next President Is", The Daily Beast, November 4, 2016, retrieved December 2, 2016
  • Schatz, Bryan, "The Kremlin Would Be Proud of Trump's Propaganda Playbook", Mother Jones, retrieved December 2, 2016
  • "Spy Agency Consensus Grows That Russia Hacked D.N.C.". New York Times. Retrieved July 26, 2016.
  • Greenberg, Jon (December 11, 2016), "Reince Priebus falsely claims no conclusive report whether Russia tried to influence election", PolitiFact.com, retrieved December 12, 2016
  • Jim Sciutto & Manu Raju, Democrats want Russian hacking intelligence declassified, CNN (December 2, 2016).
  • Adam Entous; Ellen Nakashima; Greg Miller (December 9, 2016), "Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House", The Washington Post, retrieved December 10, 2016
  • Chris Sanchez; Bryan Logan (December 9, 2016), "The CIA says it has evidence that Russia tried to help Trump win the US election", Business Insider, retrieved December 10, 2016
  • Sommerfeldt, Chris (December 9, 2016), "Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the White House: report", New York Daily News, retrieved December 10, 2016
  • Mazzetti, Mark; Lichblau, Eric (December 11, 2016). "C.I.A. Judgment on Russia Built on Swell of Evidence". New York Times. Retrieved December 12, 2016.
  • Mary Louise Kelly (December 10, 2016), CIA Concludes Russian Interference Aimed To Elect Trump, NPR
  • Pegues, Jeff (December 14, 2016), More details on U.S. probe of Russian hacking of DNC (video), CBS News, retrieved December 15, 2016 – via YouTube
  • Barbara Starr; Pamela Brown; Evan Perez; Jim Sciutto; Elise Labott (December 15, 2016), Intel analysis shows Putin approved election hacking, CNN, retrieved December 15, 2016
  • "Putin turned Russia election hacks in Trump's favor: U.S. officials", Reuters, December 15, 2016, retrieved December 16, 2016
  • Lawler, David (December 15, 2016), "Vladimir Putin 'personally directed Russian hack of US election'", The Daily Telegraph, retrieved December 15, 2016
  • Kreiter, Marcy (December 14, 2016), "Russia Election Hack Update: Putin Reportedly Directed Effort To Undermine US Election", International Business Times, retrieved December 15, 2016
  • Kathy Gilsinan; Krishnadev Calamur (December 14, 2016), "Did Putin Direct Russian Hacking? And Other Big Questions", The Atlantic, retrieved December 15, 2016
  • "White House suggests Putin involved in hacking, ups Trump criticism", Fox News, Associated Press, December 15, 2016, retrieved December 15, 2016
  • Pearson, Rick. "FBI told state GOP in June its emails had been hacked". chicagotribune.com.
  • Rossoll, Nicki (December 11, 2016). "Reince Priebus: 'RNC Was Not Hacked'". ABC News. Retrieved December 12, 2016.
  • Seipel, Brooke (December 11, 2016). "US intelligence split on motive for Russian election interference". Retrieved December 12, 2016.
  • Strohm, Chris (December 30, 2016). "Russia 'Grizzly Steppe' Hacking Started Simply, U.S. Says". Bloomberg. Retrieved January 4, 2017.
  • Joint DHS, ODNI, FBI Statement on Russian Malicious Cyber Activity, FBI National Press Office (December 29, 2016).
  • Sanger, David E. (December 29, 2016). "Obama Strikes Back at Russia for Election Hacking". The New York Times. Retrieved December 29, 2016.
  • Goodin, Dan (December 30, 2016). "White House fails to make case that Russian hackers tampered with election". Ars Technica. Retrieved January 1, 2016.
  • Vaughan-Nichols, Steven J. (January 2, 2017). "No smoking gun for Russian DNC hacks". ZDNet. Retrieved January 3, 2017.
  • David Z. Morris. "Grizzly Misstep: Security Experts Call Russia Hacking Report "Poorly Done," "Fatally Flawed"". Retrieved January 3, 2017. Jeffrey Carr, author of Inside Cyber Warfare, wrote on Friday that the report “adds nothing to the call for evidence that the Russian government was responsible” for the campaign hacks. Robert Lee, a former Air Force cyberwarfare officer and cybersecurity fellow at New America, argues that the report is of limited use to security professionals, in part because of poor organization and lack of crucial details.
  • Poulsen, Kevin (January 6, 2017). "How the U.S. Hobbled Its Hacking Case Against Russia and Enabled Truthers". The Daily Beast. Retrieved January 8, 2017.
  • Dozier, Kimberly; Shachtman, Noah; Weiss, Michael (January 6, 2017). "U.S. Spy Report Blames Putin for Hacks, But Doesn't Back It Up". The Daily Beast. Retrieved January 7, 2017.
  • Matt Taibbi. "Something About This Russia Story Stinks". Rolling Stone. Retrieved January 3, 2017. Also, like the WMD story, there's an element of salesmanship the government is using to push the hacking narrative that should make reporters nervous.
  • "Background to 'Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections': The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attribution" (PDF). Office of the Director of National Intelligence. January 6, 2017.
  • Miller, Greg; Entous, Adam (January 6, 2017). "Declassified report says Putin 'ordered' effort to undermine faith in U.S. election and help Trump". The Washington Post.
  • Hess, Peter (January 6, 2017). "RT America Is Put in the Spotlight on Damning Intelligence Report". Inverse.
  • FBI Director: No Evidence Russia Successfully Hacked Trump Campaign, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, January 10, 2017, retrieved January 12, 2017
  • Corn, David (October 31, 2016), A Veteran Spy Has Given the FBI Information Alleging a Russian Operation to Cultivate Donald Trump, Mother Jones, retrieved January 12, 2017
  • Corn, David (January 14, 2017), Meeting the man behind the Trump memos, BBC, retrieved January 14, 2017
  • "'It Is Fake News Meant to Malign Mr. Trump'". The Atlantic. January 10, 2017. Retrieved January 12, 2017.
  • "What We Know and Don't Know About the Trump-Russia Dossier". The New York Times. January 11, 2017. Retrieved January 12, 2017.
  • Gordon, Raynor. "Former MI6 officer Christopher Steele, who produced Donald Trump Russian dossier, 'terrified for his safety' and went to ground before name released". The Telegraph. Retrieved 11 January 2017.
  • "Intel chiefs presented Trump with claims of Russian efforts to compromise him". CNN.com. Retrieved January 11, 2017.
  • "BuzzFeed's ridiculous rationale for publishing the Trump-Russia dossier". Washington Post. Retrieved January 11, 2017.
  • Sutton, Kelsey. "Trump calls CNN 'fake news,' as channel defends its reporting on intelligence briefing". Politico. Retrieved 11 January 2017.
  • Jeff Stein (January 10, 2017). "Trump, Russian Spies, and the Infamous "Golden Showers" Memos". Newsweek.
  • "U.S. Spies Warn Trump and GOP: Russia Could Get You Next". The Daily Beast. Retrieved 11 January 2017.
  • "Trump Received Unsubstantiated Report That Russia Had Damaging Information About Him". The New York Times. Retrieved January 11, 2017.
  • "Trump was not briefed on document with explosive Russia allegations, official says". CNBC.com. January 11, 2017. Retrieved January 12, 2017.
  • Hartmann, Margaret. "Clapper Denounces 'Corrosive and Damaging' Trump Dossier Leak". Daily Intelligencer. Retrieved 12 January 2017.
  • Rascoe, Ayesha (January 11, 2017). "Trump assails 'phony' Russia dossier in chaotic news conference". Reuters. Retrieved 11 January 2017.
  • Weisman, Jonathan; Steinhauer, Jennifer (12 January 2017). "Intelligence Chief's Olive Branch to Trump Gets Twisted in Translation". The New York Times.
  • Hope, Bradley. "Christopher Steele, Ex-British Intelligence Officer, Said to Have Prepared Dossier on Trump". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 11 January 2017.
  • Behar, Richard. "Could This Be The British Ex-MI6 Agent Behind The Trump FBI Memos?". Forbes. Retrieved 11 January 2017.
  • Hughes, Chris. "First picture of British spy behind Donald Trump 'dirty dossier' revealed". Mirror. Retrieved 12 January 2017.
  • Borger, Julian (January 11, 2017), John McCain passes dossier alleging secret Trump-Russia contacts to FBI, The Guardian, retrieved January 12, 2017
  • Miller, Kevin (December 1, 2016), "Angus King: Russian involvement in U.S. election 'an arrow aimed at the heart of democracy'", Portland Press Herald, retrieved December 2, 2016
  • Jim Sciutto; Manu Raju (December 3, 2016), Democrats want Russian hacking intelligence declassified, CNN, retrieved December 3, 2016
  • Staff report (November 30, 2016), "Angus King among senators asking president to declassify information about Russia and election", Portland Press Herald, retrieved December 2, 2016
  • Timberg, Craig (November 30, 2016), "Effort to combat foreign propaganda advances in Congress", The Washington Post, retrieved December 1, 2016
  • Porter, Tom (December 1, 2016), "US House of representatives backs proposal to counter global Russian subversion", International Business Times UK edition, retrieved December 1, 2016
  • Demirjian, Karoun (December 8, 2016), "Republicans ready to launch wide-ranging probe of Russia, despite Trump's stance", Chicago Tribune, The Washington Post, retrieved December 10, 2016
  • Senate Republicans join Democrats in calling for probe of Russian electioneering hacks, CBS News, Associated Press, December 11, 2016, retrieved December 11, 2016
  • Peralta, Eyder (December 11, 2016), "As Trump Dismisses CIA, Congress Looks To Confront Russian Cyberattacks", National Public Radio, retrieved December 11, 2016
  • John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Chuck Schumer, Jack Reed (December 11, 2016), McCain, Graham, Schumer, Reed Joint Statement on Reports That Russia Interfered with the 2016 Election, United States Senate Committee on Armed Services, retrieved December 11, 2016
  • Seung Min Kim & Burgess Everett, Trump vs. Congress on Russian hacking, Politico (December 11, 2016).
  • McCain to Trump on Russian hacking: 'The facts are there' – CBS, Reuters, December 11, 2016, retrieved December 11, 2016
  • Meyer, Theodoric (December 11, 2016), "McCain wants select committee to investigate Russian hacking", Politico
  • Brown, Greg (December 11, 2016), "Lankford joins in call for bipartisan investigation into Russian election interference", KOKI-TV, retrieved December 11, 2016
  • CNN, Theodore Schleifer and Deirdre Walsh. "McCain: Russian cyberintrusions an 'act of war'". CNN. Retrieved 2017-01-14.
  • Elise Viebeck; Karoun Demirjian (December 11, 2016), "Key GOP senators join call for bipartisan Russia election probe, even as their leaders remain mum", The Washington Post, retrieved December 12, 2016
  • David Smith, FBI covered up Russian influence on Trump's election win, Harry Reid claims, The Guardian (December 10, 2016).
  • O'Keefe, Ed; Kane, Paul (December 12, 2016). "McConnell announces Senate probe of suspected Russian election interference: 'The Russians are not our friends'". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 12, 2016.
  • Nicholas Fandos, Bipartisan Letter Seeks Single Inquiry Into Russian Hacking Claims, New York Times (December 18, 2016).
  • Diaz, Daniella (December 14, 2016), "Graham: Russians hacked my campaign email account", CNN, retrieved December 15, 2016
  • Blitzer, Wolf (December 14, 2016), "Graham: Russians hacked my campaign", CNN (video), YouTube, retrieved December 15, 2016
  • Williams, Katie Bo (December 15, 2016), "Graham: Tillerson must say Russia hacked US to earn his confirmation vote", The Hill, retrieved December 16, 2016
  • Harris, Shane (December 11, 2016), "Donald Trump Fuels Rift With CIA Over Russian Hack", The Wall Street Journal, retrieved December 12, 2016
  • Rachael Bade, Ryan stops short of call for Russia probe, Politico (December 12, 2016).
  • Steinhauer, Jennifer (December 12, 2016), "McConnell and Ryan Back Russia Inquiries, Raising Potential Clash With Trump", The New York Times, retrieved December 12, 2016
  • Ellen Nakashima; Adam Entous (December 10, 2016), "FBI and CIA give differing accounts to lawmakers on Russia's motives in 2016 hacks", The Washington Post, retrieved December 12, 2016
  • Jones, Susan (December 15, 2016). "Intelligence Agencies Refuse to Brief House Intelligence Committee on Russian Hacking". The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved December 16, 2016. cf. Kelly, Erin (December 14, 2016). "Intelligence officials refuse to brief House panel on Russian hacking". USA Today. Retrieved December 16, 2016. cf. "Intelligence Community Statement on Review of Foreign Influence on U.S. Elections". Office of the Director of National Intelligence. December 14, 2016. Retrieved December 16, 2016.
  • Sanger, David E. (December 9, 2016), "Obama Orders Intelligence Report on Russian Election Hacking", The New York Times, retrieved December 10, 2016
  • "Obama says he told Putin to 'cut it out' on Russia hacking". Politico. December 16, 2016.
  • Elizabeth Weise; Gregory Korte (December 9, 2016), "Obama orders review of foreign attempts to hack U.S. election", USA Today, retrieved December 10, 2016
  • Josh Gerstein; Jennifer Scholtes; Eric Geller; Martin Matishak (December 9, 2016), "Obama orders 'deep dive' of election-related hacking", Politico, retrieved December 10, 2016
  • Elise Labott, Official: Probe 'solely about lessons learned' on foreign hacking, CNN (December 10, 2016).
  • Griffiths, Brent (December 12, 2016), "White House rails against Trump for not accepting evidence of Russia hacking", Politico, retrieved December 13, 2016
  • Fabian, Jordan (December 16, 2016), "Obama turns down temperature on Trump fight", The Hill, retrieved December 17, 2016
  • Greenberg, Andy. "US Hits Russia With Biggest Spying Retaliation "Since the Cold War"". Wired.
  • "Obama Strikes Back at Russia for Election Hacking". The New York Times. December 29, 2016.
  • http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-russia-cyber-idUSKBN14I1TY
  • Russia retaliates against US 'spy' expulsions The Guardian, March 22, 2001.
  • "U.S. imposes sanctions on Russia over election interference". CBS News. December 29, 2016. Retrieved December 29, 2016.
  • "US expels 35 Russian diplomats, closes two compounds: report". DW.COM. December 29, 2016. Retrieved December 29, 2016.
  • Mark Mazzetti & Michael S. Schmidt, Two Russian Compounds, Caught Up in History’s Echoes, New York Times (December 29, 2016).
  • Ian Duncan, Shut down Russian Eastern Shore retreat offers glimpse at spy battles, Baltimore Sun (December 30, 2016).
  • Evan Perez and Daniella Diaz. "Russia sanctions announced by White House". CNN.
  • "Obama authorises US sanctions against Russia". December 29, 2016.
  • "U.S. shuts Russian compounds in Maryland, New York over hacking". CBS News. Associated Press. December 30, 2016. Retrieved December 30, 2016.
  • Plane with Russian diplomats expelled from US lands in Moscow. TASS. January 2, 2017.
  • Trump praises Putin for holding back spy dispute. The Gulf Today. January 1, 2017
  • Chozick, Amy (December 17, 2016), "Clinton Says 'Personal Beef' by Putin Led to Hacking Attacks", The New York Times, p. A12, retrieved December 17, 2016
  • Abdullah, Halimah (December 16, 2016), "Hillary Clinton Singles Out Putin, Comey in Election Loss", NBC News, retrieved December 17, 2016
  • cf. Tau, Byron (September 14, 2016). "Colin Powell Blasts Donald Trump, Criticizes Hillary Clinton in Leaked Messages". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved December 11, 2016.
  • Kaczynski, Andrew (December 19, 2016), "Trump said in 2014 that Russian hacking was a 'big problem'", CNN, retrieved December 20, 2016
  • Pramuk, Jacob (September 26, 2016). "Trump: DNC hacker could have been 400 pounds and sitting in bed". CNBC. Retrieved December 14, 2016.
  • Fox-Brewster, Thomas (October 10, 2016). "Clinton Claims Putin's Hackers Are Punting For Trump". Forbes. Retrieved December 14, 2016.
  • Kessler, Glenn (December 13, 2016). "The pre-war intelligence on Iraq: Wrong or hyped by the Bush White House?". Washington Post. Retrieved December 19, 2016.
  • Flores, Reena (December 11, 2016). "Donald Trump weighs in on Russia hacking election, CIA intelligence". CBS News. Retrieved December 13, 2016.
  • Gittens, Hasani; Dilanian, Ken (January 4, 2017). "Trump Takes Jab at 'Intelligence' Officials for Allegedly Delaying 'Russian Hacking' Briefing". NBC News. Retrieved January 5, 2017.
  • "Trump praises 'very smart' Putin for not expelling US diplomats". The Guardian. December 30, 2016.
  • "After Security Meeting, Trump Admits Possibility of Russian Hacking". The New York Times. January 6, 2017.
  • "Trump to order anti-hacking plan within 90 days of taking office - statement". Yahoo News. January 6, 2017.
  • Clarke, Toni; Volz, Dustin (January 8, 2017). "Trump acknowledges Russia role in U.S. election hacking: aide". Reuters. Retrieved January 9, 2017.
  • Shear, Michael D.; Weisman, Jonathan (January 11, 2017). "Trump Says 'I Think It Was Russia' That Hacked the Democrats". The New York Times. Retrieved January 11, 2017.
  • "WikiLeaks' Assange: 'A 14-year-old kid could have hacked Podesta' emails". FoxNews.com. January 4, 2017.
  • Reports: U.S. Knows Which Russians Provided Hacked E-Mails To WikiLeaks
  • U.S. intel report identifies Russians who gave emails to WikiLeaks -officials Reuters, January 6, 2017.
  • Mills, Curt (December 15, 2016), "Kremlin Denies Putin's Involvement in Election Hacking", U.S. News & World Report, retrieved December 16, 2016
  • Henry Meyer; Stepan Kravchenko (December 15, 2016), "Russia Rejects as 'Rubbish' Claims Putin Directed U.S. Hacking", Bloomberg News, retrieved December 16, 2016
  • Smith, Allan (December 16, 2016), "Russia responds to reports it hacked US election: Prove it", Business Insider, retrieved December 16, 2016
  • "Russia's View of the Election Hacks: Denials, Amusement, Comeuppance". The New Yorker. 2016-12-20. Retrieved 2017-01-14.
  • Cheney, Kyle (December 12, 2016). "Electors demand intelligence briefing before Electoral College vote". Politico.
  • Pelosi, Christine. "Bipartisan Electors Ask James Clapper: Release Facts on Outside Interference in U.S. Election".
  • Pete Williams, Coming Soon: The 'Real' Presidential Election, NBC News (December 15, 2016).
  • Shane Harris, Donald Trump Fuels Rift With CIA Over Russian Hack, Wall Street Journal (December 11, 2016).
  • Brian Ross, James Gordon Meek, Mike Levine & Justin Fishel, Trump Engages CIA in War of Words Over Russian Election Hacking, ABC News (December 12, 2016).
  • John Cassidy, Trump Isolates Himself With C.I.A. Attack, The New Yorker (December 12, 2016).
  • Ackerman, Spencer (December 11, 2016), "Intelligence figures fear Trump reprisals over assessment of Russia election role", The Guardian, retrieved December 11, 2016
  • "Morell calls Russia's meddling in U.S. elections 'political equivalent of 9/11'". Politico. December 13, 2016.
  • Michael V. Hayden, Trump is already antagonizing the intelligence community, and that’s a problem, Washington Post (December 12, 2016).
  • Rebecca Savransky, Former CIA spokesman: Trump's disrespect for intelligence community is 'shameful', The Hill (December 12, 2016).
  • Nelson, Louis (December 14, 2016), "McMullin: GOP ignored Russian meddling in presidential election", Politico, retrieved December 15, 2016
  • Binney, William; McGovern, Ray (January 5, 2017). "Emails were leaked, not hacked". The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved January 5, 2017.
  • Ritter, Scott (December 12, 2016). "The 'Slam Dunk' That Isn't – The CIA, Russia And The Hacking Of The 2016 Presidential Election". Huffington Post. Retrieved January 4, 2017.
  • Michael McFaul, Let’s get the facts right on foreign involvement in our elections, Washington Post (December 10, 2016).
  • Robert S. McElvaine, Save America through a Compromise of 2016, Huffington Post (December 10, 2016).
  • Steinberg, Joseph (December 12, 2016), "Russian Hacking: 8 Tough Questions the U.S. Government Is Not Answering", Inc., retrieved December 17, 2016
  • Biddle, Sam (January 6, 2017), "OBAMA MUST DECLASSIFY EVIDENCE OF RUSSIAN HACKING", The Intercept, retrieved January 12, 2017
  • "White House fails to make case that Russian hackers tampered with election", Ars Technica, December 31, 2016
  • "RT editor disputes US hacking report's implication of Russian news channel", The Guardian, January 9, 2017
  • "Trump is way off on Russia hack report: Max Boot". USA TODAY. Retrieved 2017-01-14.
  • Gessen, Masha (January 9, 2017). "Russia, Trump & Flawed Intelligence". The New York Review of Books. A close reading of the report shows that it barely supports such a conclusion [that Russian president Vladimir Putin ordered an “influence campaign” to help Donald Trump win the presidency]. Indeed, it barely supports any conclusion.
  • "Views of Russia as a 'major threat,' 2005-2017". Pew Research Center. January 12, 2017. Retrieved January 13, 2017.
  • "American Voters Back Sanctions For Russian Hacking, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds Israel, Palestinians Not Sincere About Peace, Voters Say". Quinnipiac University. January 13, 2017.
  • Posted by at
    Labels:

    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)