tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7622652574484898497.post6469246366601222789..comments2024-03-27T02:16:20.566-07:00Comments on Intuitive fred888: Cancer rates 1900 to 2000 and beyondintuitivefred888http://www.blogger.com/profile/03668560684200481313noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7622652574484898497.post-72186500426767387532016-11-25T13:01:48.187-08:002016-11-25T13:01:48.187-08:00I am not an expert of any sorts I'm studying f...I am not an expert of any sorts I'm studying for my BCOM but I do try to apply logic to stuff, I only skimmed the article but a fact popped out about growth rates in men over 65, this is more likely because the population hitting 65 now didn't fight in the world wars. This would mangle statistics.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7622652574484898497.post-78529692662450262772016-07-06T02:33:01.078-07:002016-07-06T02:33:01.078-07:00Life expectancy of acient Greeks was 20, really? I...Life expectancy of acient Greeks was 20, really? I think you'll find both historical facts and common sense would disagree.<br />Alexander the Great was considered to have died very young at just 33 years old. Also if most adults died around 20 how would they have ever finished building Athens? By the time someone may have a child at say 16 the parents would be dead at 20 leaving the 4 year old or younger kids to look after themselves.<br />From this, I'm not sure ANY of your figures here can be trusted.<br />Ben Gillotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10059769655742608833noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7622652574484898497.post-55955718318079631032015-02-02T13:35:56.817-08:002015-02-02T13:35:56.817-08:00I was looking at the data on obesity and Cancer. ...I was looking at the data on obesity and Cancer. Obesity does not cause an increase in cancer even though the American Cancer Society says it does. There is a direct correlation between increased body mass and the propensity to get certain cancers, but that correlation is there only because of the increase in the body itself. In other words, if there is MORE OF YOU there are more radioactive rays that strike your body and can cause cancer. The more strikes by radiation them chances of cancer.Joe Neubarthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00175175428341424749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7622652574484898497.post-36632331549499609052015-01-02T10:11:01.309-08:002015-01-02T10:11:01.309-08:00Some viruses cause cancer. The simian vacuolating ...Some viruses cause cancer. The simian vacuolating virus 40 or simian virus 40 from the polio vaccine which causes brain, bones and other cancers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7622652574484898497.post-88439537662739625312014-04-21T00:19:57.830-07:002014-04-21T00:19:57.830-07:00So, if people are callous enough to sell non-foods...So, if people are callous enough to sell non-foods to people as foods then if it did cause cancer why is anyone at all surprised?intuitivefred888https://www.blogger.com/profile/03668560684200481313noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7622652574484898497.post-40531423294625827732014-04-21T00:16:07.380-07:002014-04-21T00:16:07.380-07:00One of the things I have read about a lot is the C...One of the things I have read about a lot is the Character of Betty Crocker was used first to sell people on products using White Flour. White flour has all the natural food value mostly refined right out of it. So, it was sort of like selling candy to babies at first with no real food value at all. I firmly believe if someone wanted to they could grind up cardboard, add sugar and maybe salt call it "heaven" or something and make a fortune which is really sad because it would be sort of like right now when bakeries add Sawdust as filler to breads or plastic to some cheeses for filler. So, why not just take dirt and add sugar after powdering it and sell it to people? Whether it causes cancer or not there is no real food value to any of it. To me this is the real point of all this.intuitivefred888https://www.blogger.com/profile/03668560684200481313noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7622652574484898497.post-40878929671678083162014-04-19T17:14:00.485-07:002014-04-19T17:14:00.485-07:00I have looked and looked and can not find any scie...I have looked and looked and can not find any scientific research that proves that processed foods cause cancer. IF you know of such a study, please post it. Years ago I asked the ACS to show me where there were studies that proved that Chemicals cause cancer in the absence of background radiation. They told me that was impossible. There was no study ever done like that. So, I believe that most cancers are caused by radiation.Joe Neubarthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00175175428341424749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7622652574484898497.post-57769254325376889562013-12-18T09:08:14.447-08:002013-12-18T09:08:14.447-08:00http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-altitude_nuclear...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-altitude_nuclear_explosion<br /><br /><br />In the late 50s to early 60s the United States and Russia participated in high altitude nuclear detonation.<br />Sherryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07389695449076636459noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7622652574484898497.post-55120582445632749042013-12-18T09:06:52.650-08:002013-12-18T09:06:52.650-08:00http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-altitude_nuclear...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-altitude_nuclear_explosion<br /><br />In the late 50's to the early 60's the Unites States and Russia participated in high altitude nuclear detonations. <br /><br />Sherryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07389695449076636459noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7622652574484898497.post-45464212725564779322013-09-25T10:20:57.782-07:002013-09-25T10:20:57.782-07:00One of the biggest changes from 1900 to present is...One of the biggest changes from 1900 to present is the ingestion of sugar and refined carbohydrate. A drastic change in diet occurred in the 20th century, spurred by government dietary guidelines. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7622652574484898497.post-86355157580635992532012-12-02T11:17:03.602-08:002012-12-02T11:17:03.602-08:00This certainly does an excellent job of pointing o...This certainly does an excellent job of pointing out the fact that the cancer rate exploded over the last 100 years but makes a somewhat lesser assumption that it must be caused by "processed" food while completely dismissing or ignoring the fact that this same time frame also saw the birth of the Nuclear Age and throughout these years people were exposed to large amounts of radiation without any regard to safety for which we are still paying the price today and will continue to do so for generations to come! The huge increase in the rate of cancer and other such genetic deformities can be attributed to the long-term effects of radiation which directly correlates to this same time frame.<br /><br />It wasn't until 1946 that scientists even figured out that radiation causes mutations and genetic damage. So for the first 50-years people stood in front of open x-ray machines and drank radioactive solutions without any regard for health or the environment. There were even machines in shoe stores that measured your shoe size using x-rays. And it took another 2-decades before the government faced up to this fact by finally banning atmospheric testing in 1963. Plus where all this radioactive waste was dumped over all these years is anyone's guess?<br /><br />Accordingly, most food grown today still contains small amounts of radioactive fallout some more than others which certainly means you are what you eat as food is the vehicle through which all deadly toxic compounds are transmitted and accumulate in the body. If someone accepts the presence of "pesticides" in the food supply then they also must include radioactive fallout from the decades of weapons tests which is everywhere and only increased by meltdowns such as Chernobyl and Fukushima all of which still persists to this day in the air, water and soil around the planet. So next time you eat that hamburger, you also need to account for how many "Sunshine units" it contains! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7622652574484898497.post-25660526195208790992011-12-01T04:32:37.596-08:002011-12-01T04:32:37.596-08:00This is a very concise way of showing how processe...<b>This is a very concise way of showing how processed food is at the root of many cancers. Some might argue that if it really was the case then <i>'surely the government would do something'</i>. Well, they are. They're bending over to food company lobbyists, allowing anything to go into 'food' and now taking it a stage further, making it illegal to grow your own (see USA & soon NZ).</b>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com