I was interested in cancer rates from 1900 until the present and this is part of what I found. I was trying to see if radiation from nuclear weapons and nuclear power plants increased cancer rates but if I am to believe the following rates it had more to do with two other factors. First when people lived longer (past 40 to 60) they got more cancer from living longer. For example, many less people died from senile dementia or Alzheimers before 1950 because most people died before age 60. 2nd it appears increased cancer rates appear to be caused more by processed foods than any other single cause. If I follow this logic fast foods should greatly increase cancers over the next 20 to 50 years as people who have eaten it all their lives get into their 70s to 90s and above. Begin quotes:
http://www.gotapex.com/cooking-and-food-subforum/167290-100-years-of-cancer-history.html 100 years of cancer history from an email I received:
I just read that scientists worldwide will be looking for
genetic mutations (i.e.: DNA "mistakes") associated with
cancer.
What a waste of time and money. We already have the
answer to 99% of cancer. It's all in what we put in our
mouths, which creates a toxic environment for cancer to
grow and thrive. Simple.
If you doubt what I'm saying, take a quick look at the
last 100 years of US history:
The year 1900: Cancer caused only 3 out 100 deaths in the
US. Breast cancer was basically unheard of.
- Food manufacturers began developing "better living
through chemistry" products like artificial sweeteners
(saccharin), taste additives (MSG), partially hydrogenated
vegetable shortening and margarine.
- Refined white sugar (acid and fat on a spoon) replaced
molasses as the leading sweetener in the American diet.
1911: A grain-milling process was discovered that strips
away the germ and outer layers of wheat grain (where the
nutrients are). The result: Nutrient-poor, acid-creating
white bread and refined white flour.
1921: General Mills invented a character named Betty
Crocker to convince Americans to eat more processed foods
(and increase the company's stock value).
1935: Only one case of cancer had been reported in the
last 50 years by the Inuit (Eskimo) people of Alaska and
Canada. After they began eating processed foods, their
cancer rate exploded until it equaled that of the US by the
1970's.
1938: From now until 1990, the avera ge male sperm count
will drop by nearly half, and testicular cancer will triple.
1949: After being unheard of 49 years ago, the breast
cancer rate is now 58 out of every 100,000 women.
1950: From now to the year 2000, the overall cancer rate
will go up 55%. (Lung cancer due to smoking is only 1/4 of
that.) Breast and colon cancer will go up 60%, brain
cancer 80% and childhood cancer will increase 20%.
1970: Americans spend $6 billion on fast food. By 2001,
that will skyrocket to $110 billion.
1971: The US Congress declares its "War on Cancer" which
has done virtually nothing to stop the growing rates of
cancer in the US in the next 30+ years.
- The US Department of Agriculture wrote "An Evaluation of
Research in the US on Human Nutrition; Report No. 2,
Benefits From Nutrition Research" which blamed the lack of
nutrients in the American diet for most major health
problems. That report was banned from public view for 21
years, reportedly at the insistence of the processed food
industry.
1973: From now to 1991, prostate cancer will go up 126%.
1982: Teenage boys drink twice as much milk as soda. By
2002, they will be drinking twice as much soda as milk.
1990: From now to 2005, over 120,000 new processed foods
will be developed to join the 320,000 processed foods
already on the store shelves.
2000: Cancer is now the cause of 20 out of 100 of all
deaths in the US, compared to just 3 out of 100 in 1900.
2001: Americans spend $110 billion a year on fast food.
Every single day, 1 out of 4 Americans eats at least one
meal in a fast food restaurant.
2005: Breast cancer, which was extremely rare back in
1900 and only affected 58 out of 100,000 women in 1949, now
strikes 1 in 3 women in the US. That means that in just 55
short years, it has gone up 568 times what it was. Scary.
Must be a virus, huh? Or our DNA has changed a lot, huh?
Momma Mia...
History speaks for itself. If you want to be alive into
your golden years and stay pain and disease-free, stay the
hell away from processed foods of any kind. That includes
boxed, bagged, canned or jarred foods, fast food, soda and
bottled sweetened drinks.
Jack La Lanne (who is 93, but looks about 70) has an easy
rule. Here it is: "If man made it, don't eat it." |
This is a very concise way of showing how processed food is at the root of many cancers. Some might argue that if it really was the case then 'surely the government would do something'. Well, they are. They're bending over to food company lobbyists, allowing anything to go into 'food' and now taking it a stage further, making it illegal to grow your own (see USA & soon NZ).
ReplyDeleteThis certainly does an excellent job of pointing out the fact that the cancer rate exploded over the last 100 years but makes a somewhat lesser assumption that it must be caused by "processed" food while completely dismissing or ignoring the fact that this same time frame also saw the birth of the Nuclear Age and throughout these years people were exposed to large amounts of radiation without any regard to safety for which we are still paying the price today and will continue to do so for generations to come! The huge increase in the rate of cancer and other such genetic deformities can be attributed to the long-term effects of radiation which directly correlates to this same time frame.
ReplyDeleteIt wasn't until 1946 that scientists even figured out that radiation causes mutations and genetic damage. So for the first 50-years people stood in front of open x-ray machines and drank radioactive solutions without any regard for health or the environment. There were even machines in shoe stores that measured your shoe size using x-rays. And it took another 2-decades before the government faced up to this fact by finally banning atmospheric testing in 1963. Plus where all this radioactive waste was dumped over all these years is anyone's guess?
Accordingly, most food grown today still contains small amounts of radioactive fallout some more than others which certainly means you are what you eat as food is the vehicle through which all deadly toxic compounds are transmitted and accumulate in the body. If someone accepts the presence of "pesticides" in the food supply then they also must include radioactive fallout from the decades of weapons tests which is everywhere and only increased by meltdowns such as Chernobyl and Fukushima all of which still persists to this day in the air, water and soil around the planet. So next time you eat that hamburger, you also need to account for how many "Sunshine units" it contains!
One of the biggest changes from 1900 to present is the ingestion of sugar and refined carbohydrate. A drastic change in diet occurred in the 20th century, spurred by government dietary guidelines.
ReplyDeletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-altitude_nuclear_explosion
ReplyDeleteIn the late 50's to the early 60's the Unites States and Russia participated in high altitude nuclear detonations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-altitude_nuclear_explosion
ReplyDeleteIn the late 50s to early 60s the United States and Russia participated in high altitude nuclear detonation.
I have looked and looked and can not find any scientific research that proves that processed foods cause cancer. IF you know of such a study, please post it. Years ago I asked the ACS to show me where there were studies that proved that Chemicals cause cancer in the absence of background radiation. They told me that was impossible. There was no study ever done like that. So, I believe that most cancers are caused by radiation.
ReplyDeleteOne of the things I have read about a lot is the Character of Betty Crocker was used first to sell people on products using White Flour. White flour has all the natural food value mostly refined right out of it. So, it was sort of like selling candy to babies at first with no real food value at all. I firmly believe if someone wanted to they could grind up cardboard, add sugar and maybe salt call it "heaven" or something and make a fortune which is really sad because it would be sort of like right now when bakeries add Sawdust as filler to breads or plastic to some cheeses for filler. So, why not just take dirt and add sugar after powdering it and sell it to people? Whether it causes cancer or not there is no real food value to any of it. To me this is the real point of all this.
ReplyDeleteSo, if people are callous enough to sell non-foods to people as foods then if it did cause cancer why is anyone at all surprised?
ReplyDeleteSome viruses cause cancer. The simian vacuolating virus 40 or simian virus 40 from the polio vaccine which causes brain, bones and other cancers.
ReplyDeleteI was looking at the data on obesity and Cancer. Obesity does not cause an increase in cancer even though the American Cancer Society says it does. There is a direct correlation between increased body mass and the propensity to get certain cancers, but that correlation is there only because of the increase in the body itself. In other words, if there is MORE OF YOU there are more radioactive rays that strike your body and can cause cancer. The more strikes by radiation them chances of cancer.
ReplyDeleteLife expectancy of acient Greeks was 20, really? I think you'll find both historical facts and common sense would disagree.
ReplyDeleteAlexander the Great was considered to have died very young at just 33 years old. Also if most adults died around 20 how would they have ever finished building Athens? By the time someone may have a child at say 16 the parents would be dead at 20 leaving the 4 year old or younger kids to look after themselves.
From this, I'm not sure ANY of your figures here can be trusted.
I am not an expert of any sorts I'm studying for my BCOM but I do try to apply logic to stuff, I only skimmed the article but a fact popped out about growth rates in men over 65, this is more likely because the population hitting 65 now didn't fight in the world wars. This would mangle statistics.
ReplyDelete