Consequences of U.S. inaction in Syria are clear
The logic at work here — the longer the Assad regime holds on, the worse the consequences — was acknowledged by senior Obama administration officials nearly a year ago. The incoming secretary of state, John F. Kerry, repeated it at his confirmation hearing last week: “Every day that goes by, it gets worse.” From that follows a logical conclusion, stated Monday by French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius: “If we don’t give the means to the Syrian people to go achieve their freedom, there is a risk . . . that massacres and antagonisms amplify, and that extremism and terrorism prevail.”
14
Comments
- Weigh In
- Corrections?
Washington Post Editorials
Latest Editorials
America’s deadly inaction
Gov. McDonnell’s legacy
In speaking about Syria in recent days, Mr. Kerry and President Obama described not a strategy for stopping a bloodbath that threatens vital U.S. interests but rather a series of excuses for inaction. In an interview with the New Republic published over the weekend, Mr. Obama wondered how to “weigh” the thousands dying in Syria against the thousands being killed in the Congo, as if all wars are of equal importance to the United States or the inability to solve every problem means America should not help even where it can.
Not for the first time, Mr. Obama also asked whether U.S. intervention could “trigger even worse violence or the use of chemical weapons.” The president asked the same question a year ago, and the answer is now known: In the absence of U.S. action, the violence grew far worse and the Assad regime moved dangerously close to using chemical arms.
The United States could do much to shape the course of events in Syria without using American troops. It could begin providing aid directly to Syrian refugee organizations and civilian councils inside the country, as France has done for months. It could provide arms to moderate rebel factions, so that they can compete with the jihadists and so that they will look to the United States when the war is over. Continued passivity will ensure that the crisis in Syria continues to worsen — along with the consequences for the United States.
Read more from Opinions:
Richard Cohen: Obama’s failure in Syria
David Ignatius: Worries about a ‘failed state’ in Syria
The Post’s View: Assad and U.S. are blind to reality in Syria
Jackson Diehl: A jihadist group prospers in Syria
end quote from:
Richard Cohen: Obama’s failure in Syria
David Ignatius: Worries about a ‘failed state’ in Syria
The Post’s View: Assad and U.S. are blind to reality in Syria
Jackson Diehl: A jihadist group prospers in Syria
end quote from: