| Washington Post | - |
The
Senate vote Thursday to lower the barriers for presidential nominations
should make it easier for President Obama to accomplish key second-term
priorities, including tougher measures on climate change and financial
regulation, that have faced intense ...
Senate’s filibuster rule change should help Obama achieve key second-term priorities
Video:
At Friday's White House briefing, President Obama praised the Senate's vote to change filibuster rules.
The move to allow a simple majority vote on most executive and judicial nominees also sets the stage for Obama to appoint new top officials to the Federal Reserve and other key agencies — probably leading to more aggressive action to stimulate the economy and housing market. And it frees Obama to make changes to his Cabinet without the threat of long delays in the Senate before the confirmation of nominees.
Video
It's more than just a rule change: The
so-called "nuclear option" will fundamentally alter the way the Senate
operates - for good.
More from PostPolitics
Obamacare 2015 open enrollment set to be delayed one month
While the 2015 enrollment period had been set to begin Oct. 15,
2014 and end Dec. 7, it will now begin Nov. 15, 2014, and end Jan. 15,
2015.
Casting the ‘deciding’ vote for Obamacare?
A new attack ad claims that Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) cast the deciding vote for Obamacare.
This is what happened in the Senate Thursday
Confused by terms like filibuster and cloture, and looking for some clarity? We hope this will help.
The court is likely to help decide whether Obama can enact new Environmental Protection Agency regulations limiting greenhouse-gas emissions by power plants — a key element of his second-term plan to combat climate change — as well as a variety of other rules affecting the environment and the financial industry.
Republicans have blocked Obama’s three nominees to the court so far. The Senate’s action Thursday all but ensures that they will take seats on the panel in coming months, moving the advantage to Democrats by a 7 to 4 margin.
“It shifts the court quite substantially to the left,” said Amanda Cohen Leiter, a law professor at American University who previously clerked on the court. “This rebalances it to a considerable degree, and that’s exactly what Republicans were afraid of.”
Democrats say the shift in the court will be especially important given that Obama’s legislative proposals have little chance to prevail in the GOP-controlled House.
“With Congress gridlocked, much of the second term’s success is going to be based on his administrative actions and this should ensure that at least those actions get a fair hearing in this critical court,” said Douglas Kendall, founder of the left-leaning Constitutional Accountability Center.
Republicans, however, said the Senate’s move represented an outrageous repudiation of the minority party’s right to influence policy.
“This is the most important and most dangerous restructuring of Senate rules since Thomas Jefferson wrote them at the beginning of our country,” said Sen. Lamar Alexander (Tenn.). “It’s another raw exercise of political power to permit the majority to do anything it wants, whenever it wants to do it.”
The most contentious issue likely to face the appeals court are climate regulations being pursued by the EPA. The agency has already announced tough new rules limiting greenhouse-gas emissions by new power plants using its authority under the Clean Air Act and is pursuing new — and far more controversial — rules for existing power plants as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment