It might be easier to read if you click the word button in the next line:Russia begins airstrikes in Syria; US warns of new concerns in conflict
MOSCOW
- Russian warplanes began airstrikes in Syria on Wednesday, adding an
unpredictable new element to a four-year-old war that has already drawn
in the United States and allies, fueled a refugee crisis and expanded
the reach of the Islamic State.
Russia begins airstrikes in Syria; U.S. warns of new concerns in conflict
Russia
says it launched airstrikes against the Islamic State in Syria on
Wednesday after President Vladimir Putin secured his parliament's
unanimous backing. Amateur video purportedly shot in the city of Homs
shows military jets lying overhead and buildings reduced to rubble.
(Reuters)
In Washington, the dramatic escalation of Russia’s military involvement was viewed as an affront just two days after President Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin sat down to discuss means for negotiating the deep differences in their countries’ approaches to the conflict in Syria. The strikes sharply increase tensions with Russia as American officials refute Moscow’s claim that its aircraft targeted the Islamic State, the brutal extremist group that now controls much of Syria and Iraq. Instead, American officials said the strikes appeared to target opponents of Syria’s embattled President Bashar al-Assad, a key Russian ally. Those hit include U.S.-backed units that were trained and armed by the CIA, officials said. Accusing Russia of “pouring gasoline on the fire,” Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter vowed that U.S. pilots would continue their year-long bombing campaign against the Islamic State in Syria, despite Moscow’s warning to keep American planes away from its operations. “I think what they’re doing is going to backfire and is counterproductive,” said Carter.  It also raises the stakes over competing visions for Syria outlined earlier this week at the United Nations, where Putin insisted that Syria’s embattled government is the key to stability after four years of bloodshed, and Obama warned the “status quo” cannot stand. American officials were particularly irked they didn’t get much warning of the strikes, even as they make plans to resume military talks with Russia about Syria as early as next week. Discussions have been halted since last year over Russia’s support for separatists in Ukraine. Earlier on Wednesday, a Russian general posted in Baghdad showed up at the U.S. embassy there earlier, officials said, and told the American defense attache there that airstrikes would begin about an hour later. Russia’s Defense Ministry said Russian aircraft had conducted about 20 sorties targeting the Islamic State, according to news agency Interfax. The Syrian state-run news agency reported Russian planes had attacked “dens” of the Islamic State in Rastan, Talbiseh and other towns around Homs, the strategic city which Assad hopes to claim as he seeks to defend areas remaining under his control.  Nidal Ezddin, a representative of Homs’ civil defense force, said a series of Russian strikes killed 36 people around Homs. “These bombings were not against ISIS,” he said. “They were for ISIS.” Civil defense officials and activists also reported that some of the Russian strikes accompanied by barrel bomb attacks by Syrian Air Force helicopters. The strikes cap weeks of Russian military buildup in Syria, where Assad is battling both the Islamic State and rebel factions backed by the West. Assad’s forces are blamed for fueling the war that has forced more than 4 million people to flee the country, many of whom are now joining a wave of asylum seekers and migrants flooding Europe. Forces loyal to Assad hope to lay claim to Homs province, a key link between the capital Damascus and government strongholds on the Mediterranean coast, including the key port city of Latakia. Russia has a naval facility at Tartus, about 50 miles south of Latakia. Charles Lister, a visiting fellow at the Brookings Doha Center, said the strikes may be an attempt to weaken Assad’s principal adversary rather than the Islamic State. “Amid the regime’s major losses ... Assad’s apparent request to Moscow for military assistance seems a last gasp appeal for help from what was a dying regime,” he said. “How far Russia is willing to go to defend its proxy interests now remains to be seen, but certainly, the dynamics of the conflict have taken a huge shift today.” The strikes appeared to have also hit groups backed by the United States, including rebels who have been trained by the CIA. A U.S. official said there was “no reason to doubt reports from the region that coalition-backed forces from Hama were hit,” a reference to a rebel group known as Tajammu al-Aaza based in that western Syrian province. The leader of that group, Jamil al-Saleh, told the news organization AlSouria.net that the Russian strikes had pounded his organization’s base in al-Lataminah, a town roughly 30 miles north of Homs. Saleh was an officer in the Syrian army before defecting. The U.S.-backed group also posted a video that shows fighter jets streaking across the sky seconds before the base is rattled by explosions. The CIA has trained thousands of fighters at secret bases in Jordan in an effort to bolster moderate factions against the Assad government. A Russian strike on U.S.-backed units will only intensify pressure on the Obama administration to respond. Speaking at the United Nations, Secretary of State John F. Kerry said the United States would have “grave concerns” if Russian airstrikes hit U.S.-backed moderate opposition forces fighting Assad rather than the Islamic State. Also on Wednesday, Kerry told Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov the strikes run counter to Russia’s stated intention to cooperate on “deconfliction,” or ensuring that mishaps do not happen in the air. Putin spokesman Dmitry Peskov defended Russia’s actions after its parliament approved a resolution authorizing the use of force in Syria. “Russia will factually be the only country to carry out this operation on the legitimate basis of the request of the legitimate government of Syria,” he said. The resolution came without warning in the Federation Council, Russia’s higher body of parliament, where 162 senators voted unanimously in support after a closed-door discussion — similar to a vote last year to green-light Russian military force in Ukraine. Sergei Ivanov, the Kremlin chief of staff, said the resolution was strictly limited to the use of Russian aviation in Syria and that ground troops would not be sent into battle. While Russia has supplied arms to Assad for years, direct intervention seemed unlikely until early this month, when Russian aircraft, tanks and troops were spotted in Syria. Speaking in Moscow, Putin said he hoped Assad would be open to political compromise. “I know that President Assad understands that and is ready for such a process. We hope that he will be active and flexible and ready to compromise in the name of his country and his people,” Putin told reporters, according to Reuters. Critics say that the Kremlin is using the Syrian crisis to escape international isolation following its annexation of the Crimean Peninsula in March 2014, and to divert attention at home from the conflict in eastern Ukraine. The strikes also come as the Obama administration considers changes to its Syria strategy, including a possible expansion of military assistance to anti-Assad rebels and a new focus for a troubled effort to train an independent force to fight the Islamic State. Read more: Why Russia is in Syria Ukrainian president mocks Putin in front of United Nations Today's coverage from Post correspondents around the world 
Andrew
Roth is a reporter in The Post's Moscow bureau. He previously reported
on Russia and the former Soviet Union for The New York Times.
Brian
Murphy joined the Post after more than 20 years as a foreign
correspondent and bureau chief for the Associated Press in Europe and
the Middle East. He has reported from more than 50 countries and has
written three books.
Missy Ryan writes about the Pentagon, military issues, and national security for The Washington Post.
end quote from:
Russia begins airstrikes in Syria; US warns of new concerns in conflictIf you look closely at the videos of the buildings of people being blown up by Russia hereare apartment buildings full likely of civilians and some fighters. Whetherany ISIS is present is debatable. So, I'm thinking that these were eitherSyrian rebels who want to overthrow Assad and maybe a few ISIS peopletoo. So, it is more likely who Putin is killing here is Sunni civiliansand a few rebel fighters while he blows up apartment buildings fullof mostly civilian Sunnis.This is what I expected would happen first. He blows up Syrian rebels,calls them ISIS when likely they aren't ISIS but only a few rebels, mostlywomen and children who are dying here in apartment buildings. | |||||||||
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future