The
front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination stunned two of
America's strongest allies with the suggestion that the U.S. military
would be withdrawn from their shores, with nuclear weapons replacing
them.
There are currently 54,000 U.S. troops stationed in Japan and 28,500 in South Korea.
"Japan
is better if it protects itself against this maniac of North Korea,"
Trump told CNN's Anderson Cooper Tuesday. "We are better off frankly if
South Korea is going to start protecting itself ... they have to protect
themselves or they have to pay us."
So
high was the level of concern, Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe felt
the need to respond publicly, saying, "whoever will become the next
president of the United States, the Japan-U.S. alliance is the
cornerstone of Japan's diplomacy."
Japan
remains the only country to have had nuclear weapons used against it
and has had a non-nuclear policy and pacifist constitution since the end
of World War II.
Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida added, "It is impossible that Japan will arm itself with nuclear weapons."
South Korea has a small minority who think Trump may have a point and welcome the idea of nuclear weapons.
Academic
Cheong Seong-Chang from the non-profit think-tank the Sejong Institute
said, "If we have nuclear weapons, we'll be in a much better position to
deal with North Korea."
But his feeling is not mainstream.
South Korea 'a money machine'
Government reaction has been more focused on Trump's assertion that South Korea is not paying its way.
Trump
told CNN's Wolf Blitzer earlier this year, "South Korea is a money
machine but they pay us peanuts ... South Korea should pay us very
substantially for protecting them."
Howls of inaccuracy came from the South Korean Foreign Ministry, the U.S. ambassador to South Korea, and even the White House.
Ambassador Mark Lippert said Seoul pays for 55% of all non-personnel costs.
And
former U.S. Ambassador to South Korea Christopher Hill was more
succinct. He told CNN, "I don't know what he's talking about but clearly
neither does he."
Newspaper
editorials and experts alike have taken aim at Trump's comments about
introducing more nuclear weapons to the Korean peninsula to counter the
North Korean threat.
Daniel Pinkston of Troy University said it would play into North Korea's hands.
"The
hardliners in Pyongyang would just love such an outcome because if that
were to occur, it would completely justify their nuclear status ... and
validate Kim Jong Un's policy line as absolutely brilliant and
absolutely correct," he said.
Reflecting
a growing concern, Pinkston added, "Whether he wins the Republican
nomination or not, or whether he is elected president or not, even at
this stage, he is already doing damage to the U.S. reputation
internationally. And damaging U.S. security interests."
No comments:
Post a Comment