Rubio endangers Tillerson nomination by saying he has 'serious concerns'
Story highlights
- The Florida senator sits on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
- Meanwhile, Trump critics and allies raced to define the international business executive
Donald
Trump said Tuesday morning he would nominate the ExxonMobil CEO to the
nation's top diplomatic post, and the announcement did not split
Washington along strictly partisan lines. Some Republican foreign policy
hawks, like Rubio, have expressed discomfort with Tillerson's ties to
Russia.
Rubio
sits on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the panel that will
have to approve the nominee before the full Senate can vote on
Tillerson. Republicans will likely only hold a one-seat advantage on the
committee, meaning that Democrats along with any single Republicans can
possibly scuttle the nomination.
"While Rex Tillerson is a
respected businessman, I have serious concerns about his nomination,"
Rubio said in a statement. "The next secretary of state must be someone
who views the world with moral clarity, is free of potential conflicts
of interest, has a clear sense of America's interests, and will be a
forceful advocate for America's foreign policy goals to the president,
within the administration, and on the world stage. I look forward to
learning more about his record and his views."
Meanwhile,
Trump critics and allies raced to define the international business
executive. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat from Minnesota, said the
Republicans' initial reaction to Tillerson indicated there was
"bipartisan concern" about his Russia ties.
"I'm
sure he has excellent business credential, but Donald Trump has chosen
to put someone in as the nominee who does not have foreign policy or
diplomatic experience and has these ties to Russia," she told CNN's
Poppy Harlow on "New Day."
And Rudy
Giuliani, the close Trump associate who was passed over for the
secretary of state posting, told CNN's Chris Cuomo that while he did not
know Tillerson well, he was confident in him and would not say that he
would be a better State candidate than Tillerson.
"It's hard to say: Who would've been better as secretary of state? You find that out three or four years from now," he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment