Saturday, June 24, 2017

Most people just don't get what the U.S. is actually capable of

Note: The 1000 missiles I'm talking about here don't explode. The primary purpose of doing something like this is NOT to kill people but rather to immobilize a city anywhere on earth. However, unfortunately in a pulse like this 1/4 to 1/2 of the people die from sparks coming off anything metal sort of like being struck by lightning. The missile impacts the ground but doesn't explode. end note.

There are other ways this can also be delivered like by driving a semi truck into a city. a miniaturized EMP device might fit in a van or car too. end note.

Imagine a missile in space coming to an enemy city in another country. This missile contains and EMP device which would destroy permanently anything electrical in that city anywhere on earth.

Imagine 1000 of these missiles coming to earth at once all timed perfectly. At 100 feet above the ground these 1000 missiles (all at once) make sure that nothing electrical in any house or car or building anywhere ever works again.

This is just one of thousands of types of different weapons that the U.S. actually has in it's arsenal.

However, if you use something like this: no cars or trucks ever work again unless their whole electrical systems are completely replaced. NO electrical wiring in any house ever works again unless all wires are rewired in not only every house but no toasters, no refrigerators, no TVs, no Routers for WIFI, nothing electrical including cell phones works ever again until the whole technology is replaced. It's all fried forever until it is replaced.

However, if you do something like this anyone within 12 feet of anything metal dies. So, 1/4 to 1/2 of everyone in a city likely would die because most people are within 12 feet of something metal and what it would look like is lightning coming off that metal and all people within 12 feet of anything metal would die.

However, there might be some exceptions to this. For example, a car or truck or plane is a Faraday cage which also protects against lightning from the sky (unless you have your rear on the seat and a foot on the ground outside (then you would be dead). But, as long as all of you is inside the car possibly you would live because the vehicle (car, truck, plane) is a Faraday cage. However, everything electrical would be gone likely in a car, truck or plane. The car and truck would just likely either freeze up or coast to a stop and the plane (unless it was a small plane with wires directly going to the control surfaces without anything electrical assisting) in other words all big passenger planes would crash because of electrical assists on control surfaces but small planes with only wires running directly from the yoke and pedals likely could glide in for a landing if people knew how to glide and weren't too overloaded weight wise.

However, this doesn't work if you have a Prius or other electric or hybrid vehicle (because the generator, motors and whole electrical systems are likely inside the Faraday Cage and likely to a greater or lesser degree damaging the DNA of the occupants already. So, I have no idea what an EMP pulse is going to do to all that or whether the Faraday Cage effect would work at all in an EMP. It's an unknown to me at present because I haven't seen any testing results on something like this.

begin quote from:

Faraday cage - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage
A Faraday cage or Faraday shield is an enclosure used to block electromagnetic fields. A Faraday shield may be formed by a continuous covering of conductive ...

Anechoic chamber

An anechoic chamber is a room designed to completely absorb ...

Faraday cage - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage
A Faraday cage or Faraday shield is an enclosure made from material that conducts electricity. It is used to block electric fields. The Faraday cage is named after ...

Talk:Faraday cage - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Faraday_cage
Are electromagnetic waves blocked by a Faraday cage? .... From Maxwell's Equations, ...

Electromagnetic shielding - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_shielding
Electromagnetic shielding is the practice of reducing the electromagnetic field in a space by ... A conductive enclosure used to block electrostatic fields is also known as a Faraday cage. ..... Copper Development Association Inc., http://www.copper.org/applications/architecture/arch_dhb/fundamentals/radio_shielding.html ...

 

Faraday cage

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Faraday cage demonstration on volunteers in the Palais de la Découverte in Paris

An American soldier in 1944 being treated with a diathermy machine. This machine produced radio waves, so to keep it from causing interference with other electronic equipment in the hospital the procedure is done inside a Faraday cage.

Faraday shield at a power plant in Heimbach, Germany

Faraday bags are a type of Faraday cage made of flexible metallic fabric. They are typically used to block remote wiping or alteration of wireless devices recovered in criminal investigations, but may also be used by the general public to protect against data theft or to enhance digital privacy.
A Faraday cage or Faraday shield is an enclosure used to block electromagnetic fields. A Faraday shield may be formed by a continuous covering of conductive material or in the case of a Faraday cage, by a mesh of such materials. Faraday cages are named after the English scientist Michael Faraday, who invented them in 1836.[1]
Video of a Faraday cage shielding a man from electricity
A Faraday cage operates because an external electrical field causes the electric charges within the cage's conducting material to be distributed such that they cancel the field's effect in the cage's interior. This phenomenon is used to protect sensitive electronic equipment from external radio frequency interference (RFI). Faraday cages are also used to enclose devices that produce RFI, such as radio transmitters, to prevent their radio waves from interfering with other nearby equipment. They are also used to protect people and equipment against actual electric currents such as lightning strikes and electrostatic discharges, since the enclosing cage conducts current around the outside of the enclosed space and none passes through the interior.
Faraday cages cannot block static or slowly varying magnetic fields, such as the Earth's magnetic field (a compass will still work inside). To a large degree, though, they shield the interior from external electromagnetic radiation if the conductor is thick enough and any holes are significantly smaller than the wavelength of the radiation. For example, certain computer forensic test procedures of electronic systems that require an environment free of electromagnetic interference can be carried out within a screened room. These rooms are spaces that are completely enclosed by one or more layers of a fine metal mesh or perforated sheet metal. The metal layers are grounded to dissipate any electric currents generated from external or internal electromagnetic fields, and thus they block a large amount of the electromagnetic interference. See also electromagnetic shielding. They provide less attenuation from outgoing transmissions versus incoming: they can shield EMP waves from natural phenomena very effectively, but a tracking device, especially in upper frequencies, may be able to penetrate from within the cage (e.g., some cell phones operate at various radio frequencies so while one cell phone may not work, another one will).
A common misconception is that a Faraday cage provides full blockage or attenuation; this is not true. The reception or transmission of radio waves, a form of electromagnetic radiation, to or from an antenna within a Faraday cage is heavily attenuated or blocked by the cage. However, a Faraday cage has varied attenuation depending on wave form, frequency or distance from receiver/transmitter, and receiver/transmitter power. Near-field high-powered frequency transmissions like HF RFID are more likely to penetrate. Solid cages generally provide better attenuation than mesh cages.

Contents

History

In 1836, Michael Faraday observed that the excess charge on a charged conductor resided only on its exterior and had no influence on anything enclosed within it. To demonstrate this fact, he built a room coated with metal foil and allowed high-voltage discharges from an electrostatic generator to strike the outside of the room. He used an electroscope to show that there was no electric charge present on the inside of the room's walls.
Although this cage effect has been attributed to Michael Faraday's famous ice pail experiments performed in 1843, it was Benjamin Franklin in 1755 who observed the effect by lowering an uncharged cork ball suspended on a silk thread through an opening in an electrically charged metal can. In his words, "the cork was not attracted to the inside of the can as it would have been to the outside, and though it touched the bottom, yet when drawn out it was not found to be electrified (charged) by that touch, as it would have been by touching the outside. The fact is singular." Franklin had discovered the behavior of what we now refer to as a Faraday cage or shield (based on Faraday's later experiments which duplicated Franklin's cork and can).[2] Additionally, Giovanni Battista Beccaria discovered this effect a long time before Faraday too.[3]

Operation


Animation showing how a Faraday cage (box) works. When an external electrical field (arrows) is applied, the electrons (little balls) in the metal move to the left side of the cage, giving it a negative charge, while the remaining unbalanced charge of the nuclei give the right side a positive charge. These induced charges create an opposing electric field that cancels the external electric field throughout the box.

Continuous

A continuous Faraday shield is a hollow conductor. Externally or internally applied electromagnetic fields produce forces on the charge carriers (usually electrons) within the conductor; the charges are redistributed accordingly due to electrostatic induction. The redistributed charges greatly reduce the voltage within the surface, to an extent depending on the capacitance. However, full cancellation does not occur.[4]

Interior charges

If a charge is placed inside an ungrounded Faraday cage, the internal face of the cage becomes charged (in the same manner described for an external charge) to prevent the existence of a field inside the body of the cage. However, this charging of the inner face re-distributes the charges in the body of the cage. This charges the outer face of the cage with a charge equal in sign and magnitude to the one placed inside the cage. Since the internal charge and the inner face cancel each other out, the spread of charges on the outer face is not affected by the position of the internal charge inside the cage. So for all intents and purposes, the cage generates the same DC electric field that it would generate if it were simply affected by the charge placed inside. The same is not true for electromagnetic waves.
If the cage is grounded, the excess charges will go to the ground instead of the outer face, so the inner face and the inner charge will cancel each other out and the rest of the cage will retain a neutral charge.

Exterior fields


Skin depth vs. frequency for some materials at room temperature, red vertical line denotes 50 Hz frequency:
Effectiveness of shielding of a static electric field is largely independent of the geometry of the conductive material. However, static magnetic fields can penetrate the shield completely.
In the case of a varying electromagnetic fields, the faster the variations are (i.e., the higher the frequencies), the better the material resists magnetic field penetration. In this case the shielding also depends on the electrical conductivity, the magnetic properties of the conductive materials used in the cages, as well as their thicknesses.
A good idea of the effectiveness of a Faraday shield can be obtained from considerations of skin depth. With skin depth, the current flowing is mostly in the surface, and decays exponentially with depth through the material. Because a Faraday shield has finite thickness, this determines how well the shield works; a thicker shield can attenuate electromagnetic fields better, and to a lower frequency.

Faraday cage

Faraday cages are Faraday shields which have holes in the conductor and are more complex to analyze. Whereas continuous shields essentially attenuate all frequencies above the skin depth, the holes in a cage can permit higher frequencies to diffract through them or set up evanescent waves a short distance inside the surface. The higher the frequencies, the better they pass through a mesh of given size. Thus to work well at high frequencies the holes in the cage must be smaller than the wavelength of the incident EM wave, and Faraday cages may be thought of as band block devices.

Examples

  • Faraday cages are routinely used in analytical chemistry to reduce noise while making sensitive measurements.
  • Faraday cages, more specifically dual paired seam Faraday bags, are often used in digital forensics to prevent remote wiping and alteration of criminal digital evidence.
  • The US and NATO Tempest standards, and similar standards in other countries, include Faraday cages as part of a broader effort to provide emission security for computers.
  • Automobile and airplane passenger compartments are essentially Faraday cages, protecting passengers from electric charges, such as lightning
  • A booster bag (shopping bag lined with aluminium foil) acts as a Faraday cage. It is often used by shoplifters to steal RFID-tagged items.[5]
  • Elevators and other rooms with metallic conducting frames and walls simulate a Faraday cage effect, leading to a loss of signal and "dead zones" for users of cellular phones, radios, and other electronic devices that require external electromagnetic signals. During training firemen and other first responders are cautioned that their two-way radios will probably not work inside elevator cars and to make allowances for that. Small, physical Faraday cages are used by electronics engineers during equipment testing to simulate such an environment to make sure that the device gracefully handles these conditions.
  • Properly designed conductive clothing can also form a protective Faraday cage. Some electrical linemen wear Faraday suits, which allow them to work on live, high-voltage power lines without risk of electrocution. The suit prevents electric current from flowing through the body, and has no theoretical voltage limit. Linemen have successfully worked even the highest voltage (Kazakhstan's Ekibastuz–Kokshetau line 1150 kV) lines safely.[citation needed]
    • Austin Richards, a physicist in California, created a metal Faraday suit in 1997 that protects him from tesla coil discharges. In 1998, he named the character in the suit Doctor MegaVolt and has performed all over the world and at Burning Man nine different years.
  • The scan room of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machine is designed as a Faraday cage. This prevents external RF (radio frequency) signals from being added to data collected from the patient, which would affect the resulting image. Radiographers are trained to identify the characteristic artifacts created on images should the Faraday cage be damaged during a thunderstorm.
  • A microwave oven utilizes a Faraday cage, which can be partly seen covering the transparent window, to contain the electromagnetic energy within the oven and to shield the exterior from radiation.
  • Plastic bags that are impregnated with metal are used to enclose electronic toll collection devices during shipment to the customer, so that a toll charge is not registered if the delivery truck carrying the item passes through a toll booth.[citation needed]
  • The shield of a screened cable, such as USB cables or the coaxial cable used for cable television, protects the internal conductors from external electrical noise and prevents the RF signals from leaking out.

See also

References




  • "Michael Faraday". Encarta. Archived from the original on 31 October 2009. Retrieved 20 November 2008.

    1. Hamill, Sean (22 December 2008). "As Economy Dips, Arrests for Shoplifting Soar". The New York Times. Retrieved 12 August 2009.

    External links

    Navigation menu




  • J. D. Krauss, Electromagnetics, 4Ed, McGraw-Hill, 1992, ISBN 0-07-035621-1

  • "The Annals of Electricity, Magnetism, and Chemistry; and Guardian of Experimental Science". 1 January 1840 – via Google Books.

  • https://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/trefethen/chapman_hewett_trefethen.pdf Mathematics of the Faraday Cage- S. Jonathan Chapman David P. Hewett Lloyd N. Trefethen

  • No comments:

    Post a Comment