Why?
Globalism means the death of small businesses everywhere as the rich business moguls like Amazon and others out compete everyone else because they don't need store fronts to do business.
Nationalism is a problem because Nationalism will create Trade Wars which in the past (world War I and World War II) create actual wars.
However, now, Economic sanctions are used by nationalistic nations instead of directly killing people through wars. But, economic sanctions don't change the minds of governments they only cause the poorest to starve worldwide.
So, whether you are for Globalism or Nationalism you are contributing to the deaths of the poor and middle Class worldwide.
This is a fact of life we all deal with.
So, when White Nationalists criticize Globalists they are right.
And when Globalists criticize White Nationalists they are right.
They are both right in the end which is a sad commentary about life on earth right now.
Both Globalism and Nationalism are the death of the poor and middle Class worldwide ongoing.
So, for the poor and middle Classes of the world it is basically: "Would you rather starve to death or die in battle?"
These appear to be the only two choices the way the world is now.
Just expect millions of poor and middle Class dying (starving to death or wars) from Globalism and Nationalism the rest of this century.
This appears to be what is coming now.
Is there an alternative?
Possibly.
I was thinking about the question more "Would you rather starve to death or die in battle?"
I was thinking that people would rather starve to death with their families rather than to die in battle alone away from their families.
So, from this one idea likely the world will stay with globalism in the main and watch the poor and middle Class slowly starve worldwide.
This is logical if you see it this way.
Only a minority of mostly men would rather die in battle worldwide.
No comments:
Post a Comment