ANALYSIS
Arts & Entertainment
Free article
Free article
‘The Kid Who Would Be King’: A classic quest set in modern times
Do the Middle Ages hold the key to saving the world? “The Kid who would be King” suggests so. This contemporary, Arthurian-themed adventure encourages kids of today to look to the legends of the past – and to the lessons of medieval chivalry – in their search for a peaceful future.
The British writer and director Joe Cornish, who wrote the screenplays for “Ant-Man” and “The Adventures of Tintin,” is back in the director’s chair for the first time since his 2011 indie thriller “Attack the Block.” Here, he views King Arthur’s court from the vantage point of a divided and leaderless time (aka present-day England). For the most part, the conceit works, delivering a hopeful tale about the struggle between good and evil in a chaotic world.
Do the Middle Ages hold the key to saving the world? “The Kid who would be King” suggests so. This contemporary, Arthurian-themed adventure encourages kids of today to look to the legends of the past – and to the lessons of medieval chivalry – in their search for a peaceful future.
The British writer and director Joe Cornish, who wrote the screenplays for “Ant-Man” and “The Adventures of Tintin,” is back in the director’s chair for the first time since his 2011 indie thriller “Attack the Block.” Here, he views King Arthur’s court from the vantage point of a divided and leaderless time (aka present-day England). For the most part, the conceit works, delivering a hopeful tale about the struggle between good and evil in a chaotic world.
The Kid who would be King
(Playing at Stadium 9)
RATING: PG
GENRE: Action & adventure, kids & family, science fiction & fantasy
DIRECTED BY: Joe Cornish
WRITTEN BY: Joe Cornish
RUNTIME: 2 hr. 15 min.
ROTTEN TOMATOES TOMATOMETER: 84%
“Kid” centers on Alex (Louis Ashbourne Serkis), a British schoolboy who is fed up with the bullies (Tom Taylor and Rhianna Dorris) who have been picking on him and his friend Bedders (Dean Chaumoo). He also longs to reconnect with his father, who left behind a book of Arthurian legends before he mysteriously disappeared.
SPONSORED CONTENT
How to pay off your house ASAP (It's so simple)
Americans could save thousands by taking advantage of this government program
But everything changes when Alex discovers a sword in an abandoned construction site – a sword that turns out to be Excalibur, the blade of lore that can be pulled from the stone only by the “true king.” Can this nerdy little boy possibly be that person? If so, he will have to face off against Morgana (Rebecca Ferguson of “Mission Impossible: Fallout”), an evil sorceress who thrives on the discord that runs rampant in the world.
Spoiler alert: He can. But only by emulating King Arthur, and by teaming up with his tormentors and following the guidance of a strange new schoolmate named Merlin (a delightfully bug-eyed Angus Imrie). Merlin, as it happens, is also a great sorcerer.
Featuring a host of CGI effects – sword-wielding trees, battalions of skeletal monsters, and a serpentine Morgana – “The Kid Who Would Be King” harks back, stylistically, to the work of stop-motion pioneer Ray Harryhausen. And there are other nods to movies of the past: In the address of a fast-food joint, Cornish includes a sly reference to the filmmaker John Boorman, director of the 1981 Arthurian epic “Excalibur.”
But the movie drags a bit when it sends Alex on a quest to find his father. Although this journey – a scenic detour that leads to historic Glastonbury Tor – enables our young heroes to tap into their still-developing strengths, it’s ironic that it seems to lead the director astray from his own storytelling prowess.
Cornish is at his best when Alex and his ragtag group stick closer to home, in an echo of Cornish’s 2011 film, which revolved around a group of high-schoolers warding off an alien invasion. (It may as well have been called “Attack the School.”) Like that (far gorier) film, this one also features a group of young people who put aside their differences to face an adversary. But “Attack the Block” had a raw energy that’s largely missing here – in part because of “Kid’s” PG rating and its younger target audience.
Still, the movie has a kind of optimism that is reflected in the new generation of English thespians in its young cast: Imrie is the son of actress Celia Imrie, and Serkis is the son of actor and filmmaker Andy Serkis. Patrick Stewart – a veteran of Boorman’s “Excalibur” who plays Merlin in his true, i.e., mature, form – represents the old guard.
“The Kid Who Would Be King” holds out no promise of an easy fix for the ills of the modern age. It does, however, suggest that our children may be the once and future kings that save us – but only if they follow the code of their elders.
end quote from:
https://durangoherald.com/articles/260416
(Playing at Stadium 9)
RATING: PG
GENRE: Action & adventure, kids & family, science fiction & fantasy
DIRECTED BY: Joe Cornish
WRITTEN BY: Joe Cornish
RUNTIME: 2 hr. 15 min.
ROTTEN TOMATOES TOMATOMETER: 84%
“Kid” centers on Alex (Louis Ashbourne Serkis), a British schoolboy who is fed up with the bullies (Tom Taylor and Rhianna Dorris) who have been picking on him and his friend Bedders (Dean Chaumoo). He also longs to reconnect with his father, who left behind a book of Arthurian legends before he mysteriously disappeared.
SPONSORED CONTENT
How to pay off your house ASAP (It's so simple)
Americans could save thousands by taking advantage of this government program
But everything changes when Alex discovers a sword in an abandoned construction site – a sword that turns out to be Excalibur, the blade of lore that can be pulled from the stone only by the “true king.” Can this nerdy little boy possibly be that person? If so, he will have to face off against Morgana (Rebecca Ferguson of “Mission Impossible: Fallout”), an evil sorceress who thrives on the discord that runs rampant in the world.
Spoiler alert: He can. But only by emulating King Arthur, and by teaming up with his tormentors and following the guidance of a strange new schoolmate named Merlin (a delightfully bug-eyed Angus Imrie). Merlin, as it happens, is also a great sorcerer.
Featuring a host of CGI effects – sword-wielding trees, battalions of skeletal monsters, and a serpentine Morgana – “The Kid Who Would Be King” harks back, stylistically, to the work of stop-motion pioneer Ray Harryhausen. And there are other nods to movies of the past: In the address of a fast-food joint, Cornish includes a sly reference to the filmmaker John Boorman, director of the 1981 Arthurian epic “Excalibur.”
But the movie drags a bit when it sends Alex on a quest to find his father. Although this journey – a scenic detour that leads to historic Glastonbury Tor – enables our young heroes to tap into their still-developing strengths, it’s ironic that it seems to lead the director astray from his own storytelling prowess.
Cornish is at his best when Alex and his ragtag group stick closer to home, in an echo of Cornish’s 2011 film, which revolved around a group of high-schoolers warding off an alien invasion. (It may as well have been called “Attack the School.”) Like that (far gorier) film, this one also features a group of young people who put aside their differences to face an adversary. But “Attack the Block” had a raw energy that’s largely missing here – in part because of “Kid’s” PG rating and its younger target audience.
Still, the movie has a kind of optimism that is reflected in the new generation of English thespians in its young cast: Imrie is the son of actress Celia Imrie, and Serkis is the son of actor and filmmaker Andy Serkis. Patrick Stewart – a veteran of Boorman’s “Excalibur” who plays Merlin in his true, i.e., mature, form – represents the old guard.
“The Kid Who Would Be King” holds out no promise of an easy fix for the ills of the modern age. It does, however, suggest that our children may be the once and future kings that save us – but only if they follow the code of their elders.
end quote from:
https://durangoherald.com/articles/260416
Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
Code of Chivalry - Medieval Life and Times
People also ask
Code of Chivalry - Medieval Chronicles
The 7 Knightly Virtues: An Attorney's Code of Chivalry — Carroll Law ...
Medieval Code Of Chivalry - Medieval Spell
Web results
Code of Chivalry - Medieval Life and Times
The Code of Chivalry was a moral system which went beyond rules of combat and introduced theconcept of Chivalrous conduct - qualities idealized by the Medieval knights such as bravery, courtesy, honor and great gallantry toward women.
The Code of Chivalry was a moral system which went beyond rules of combat and introduced theconcept of Chivalrous conduct - qualities idealized by the Medieval knights such as bravery, courtesy, honor and great gallantry toward women.
Knights Code of Chivalry - LordsAndLadies.org
There was not an authentic Knights Code of Chivalry as such - it was a moral system which went beyond rules of combat and introduced the concept of Chivalrous conduct - qualities idealized by knighthood, such as bravery, courtesy, honor, and gallantry toward women.
There was not an authentic Knights Code of Chivalry as such - it was a moral system which went beyond rules of combat and introduced the concept of Chivalrous conduct - qualities idealized by knighthood, such as bravery, courtesy, honor, and gallantry toward women.
Code of Chivalry - Medieval Chronicles
More often than not, Chivalry was associated with knighthood. The Code of Chivalry was the code of conduct followed by the knights during the medieval period.
More often than not, Chivalry was associated with knighthood. The Code of Chivalry was the code of conduct followed by the knights during the medieval period.
Chivalry - Wikipedia
Chivalry, or the chivalric code, is an informal, varying code of conduct developed between 1170 and 1220, but never decided on or summarized in a single document. It was associated with the medieval Christian institution of knighthood; knights' and gentlewomen's behaviours were governed by chivalrous social codes.
Chivalry, or the chivalric code, is an informal, varying code of conduct developed between 1170 and 1220, but never decided on or summarized in a single document. It was associated with the medieval Christian institution of knighthood; knights' and gentlewomen's behaviours were governed by chivalrous social codes.
No comments:
Post a Comment