The primary problem is precedent. Once one nation uses something nuclear then other nations are bound to do the same. For example, the U.S. and Russia and other nations use nuclear material on anti-tank rounds in order for them to melt through to the living compartment on tanks. So, whenever these "Nuclear tipped or coated rounds" come into the battle in a sense you have introduced (nuclear weapons) onto a battlefield. It is the same kind of thing with chemical weapons. Once one side uses chemical weapons other sides think it's okay too.
So, the real problem with one or more neutron bombs going off in Yemen is that likely there will be more unless there is a real outcry from the world now.
ON the other hand neutron bombs are pretty expensive and hard to make and somewhat rare. So maybe this will limit their use somewhat too.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Musk's antics likely causing Tesla's woes
- Old English "Kenning" means "Whales Road" or the Sea
- We woke up to about 4 inches of snow outside our hotel room
- Measles outbreak surpasses 350 cases and is expected to keep growing
- 'I'm worried it's getting worse': Texas measles outbreak grows as families resist vaccination
- ‘He broke barriers’: One of the last survivors of elite group of paratroopers died. He was 108
- Multistate measles outbreak crosses 450 cases
- Mt. Shasta tourism was the highest ever for winter skiing and such BEFORE Trump was inaugurated
- Tesla showrooms have attracted protesters in 100 or so cities across the US, eager to let passersby know their feelings about the chainsaw-wielding Musk.
- Rifts growing in the Taliban over the ban on girls' schooling
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment