The primary problem is precedent. Once one nation uses something nuclear then other nations are bound to do the same. For example, the U.S. and Russia and other nations use nuclear material on anti-tank rounds in order for them to melt through to the living compartment on tanks. So, whenever these "Nuclear tipped or coated rounds" come into the battle in a sense you have introduced (nuclear weapons) onto a battlefield. It is the same kind of thing with chemical weapons. Once one side uses chemical weapons other sides think it's okay too.
So, the real problem with one or more neutron bombs going off in Yemen is that likely there will be more unless there is a real outcry from the world now.
ON the other hand neutron bombs are pretty expensive and hard to make and somewhat rare. So maybe this will limit their use somewhat too.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Because of fighting in Ukraine and Israel Bombing Iran I thought I should share this EMP I wrote in 2011
- "There is nothing so good that no bad may come of it and nothing so bad that no good may come of it": Descartes
- Keri Russell pulls back the curtain on "The Diplomat" (season 2 filming now for Netflix)
- most read articles from KYIV Post
- Historicity of Jesus-Wikipedia
- reprint of: Drones very small to large
- US intelligence officials make last-ditch effort to sound the alarm over foreign election interference
- The ultra-lethal drones of the future | New York Post 2014 article
- Jack Ryan from Prime (4 seasons)
- When I began to write "A Journey through Time"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment