The primary problem is precedent. Once one nation uses something nuclear then other nations are bound to do the same. For example, the U.S. and Russia and other nations use nuclear material on anti-tank rounds in order for them to melt through to the living compartment on tanks. So, whenever these "Nuclear tipped or coated rounds" come into the battle in a sense you have introduced (nuclear weapons) onto a battlefield. It is the same kind of thing with chemical weapons. Once one side uses chemical weapons other sides think it's okay too.
So, the real problem with one or more neutron bombs going off in Yemen is that likely there will be more unless there is a real outcry from the world now.
ON the other hand neutron bombs are pretty expensive and hard to make and somewhat rare. So maybe this will limit their use somewhat too.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Full Article: Tracking the resignations, firings and investigations (regarding the Epstein Files) Worldwide!
- Epstein files fallout: Tracking the resignations, firings and investigations Worldwide
- This is what the code looks like displayed on a page
- 158,008 visits to intuitivefred888
- How much weight can a drone carry? (I asked this question because I just found out that Mexican Drug cartels ship drugs over the border on Drones now too
- Loathed and Feared as Neo-Nazis: Golden Dawn Party has gained substantial support during crisis
- I really don't think Trump and our military can guarantee the safety of OIl Tankers going through the Straight of Hormuz. Why?
- iran sending cluster bombs aboard Ballistic Missiles into Israel
- Form and Substance: OR "How do we make sense of the world?"
- Republican Speaker Mike Johnson says he doesn't support nation-building in Iran
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment