The White House
blocked several news outlets from attending a closed-door briefing
Friday afternoon with press secretary Sean Spicer, a decision that drew
strong rebukes from news organizations and may only heighten tensions
between the press corps and the administration.
The New York Times and
CNN, both of which have reported critically on the administration and are frequent targets of President
Donald Trump, were prohibited from attending. The Huffington Post was also denied entry.
Both the Associated Press
and Time magazine, which were allowed to enter, boycotted out of
solidarity with those news organizations kept out.
Spicer said prior to the
start of the administration that the White House may skip televised
daily briefings in favor of an off-camera briefing or gaggle with
reporters. But Spicer has continued doing televised daily briefings
except when traveling, making Friday’s decision an unusual one that led
to frustration among journalists kept out.
“Nothing like this has ever
happened at the White House in our long history of covering multiple
administrations of different parties,” Times executive editor Dean
Baquet said in a statement. “We strongly protest the exclusion of The
New York Times and the other news organizations. Free media access to a
transparent government is obviously of crucial national interest.”
Trump’s presidential campaign
blacklisted nearly a dozen outlets through part of the 2016 election. However, Spicer
said in
December the Trump White House would not kick news organizations out of
the briefing room over critical coverage. During a panel discussion
that month with Politico, he
said you can’t ban news organizations from the White House. “
That’s what makes a democracy a democracy versus a dictatorship.”
CNN suggested in a statement the Trump White House was retaliating against certain news outlets over their coverage.
Politico editor-in-chief
John Harris and editor Carrie Budoff Brown said in a memo to staff after
also being excluded that the newsroom’s management plans “to very
vigorously assert and defend an independent media’s right to cover the
institution of the Presidency.”
“Selectively excluding news
organizations from White House briefings is misguided and our
expectation is that this action will not be repeated,” they wrote.
Jeff Mason, a Reuters
correspondent and president of the White House Correspondents
Association, said the organization’s board “is protesting strongly
against how today’s gaggle is being handled by the White House.”
“We encourage the organizations that were allowed in to share the
material with others in the press corps who were not,” Mason said. “The
board will be discussing this further with White House staff.”
The gaggle included members
of Friday’s White House press pool, which is a rotating group of
journalists covering the president’s movements for the larger press
corps. It also included journalists from major networks like NBC, ABC,
CBS and Fox News.
The White House also invited
journalists from conservative outlets such as Breitbart News, The
Washington Times and One American News Network, sparking concerns that
the administration was playing favorites with certain politically
aligned outlets.
“We had invited the pool so
everyone was represented,” White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders told
HuffPost. “We decided to add a couple of additional people beyond the
pool. Nothing more than that.”
Hours earlier, the president
continued his attacks on the “fake news” media, which he dubbed an “enemy of the American people.”
Lydia Polgreen,
editor-in-chief of The Huffington Post, said she was “deeply disturbed”
by the White House’s decision to bar HuffPost from the briefing and
“heartened that other members of the White House Correspondents
Association decided to protest the gaggle in solidarity.”
“We hope that the White
House will recognize the vital importance of including all credentialed
media outlets when briefing reporters on matters of undeniable public
interest,” Polgreen said.
BuzzFeed editor-in-chief Ben Smith also weighed in on his outlet being left out of the briefing. “While
we strongly object to the White House’s apparent attempt to punish news
outlets whose coverage it does not like, we won’t let these latest
antics distract us from continuing to cover this administration fairly
and aggressively,” he said.
Though a reporter from the
Wall Street Journal attended, the paper said later it would not do so
again under such circumstances.
“The Wall Street Journal
strongly objects to the White House’s decision to bar certain media
outlets from today’s gaggle,” a Journal spokesman said. “Had we known at
the time, we would not have participated and we will not participate in
such closed briefings in the future.”
This story has been updated to include comment from the Wall Street Journal, Buzzfeed, Politico and The Huffington Post.
No comments:
Post a Comment