Rape victims say military labels them 'crazy'
updated 12:29 PM EDT, Sat April 14, 2012
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
- Women accuse military of using psychiatric diagnoses to oust sexual assault victims
- "I couldn't trust my chain of command to ever back me up," says an alleged victim
- 3,191 military sexual assaults reported in '11: "Unacceptable," says defense secretary
- Pentagon is assessing its training for sexual assault prevention and response
Editor's note: CNN's
Dr. Sanjay Gupta will report further on allegations of sexual assault in
the military Saturday and Sunday April 21 and 22 at 7:30 a.m. ET on "Sanjay Gupta MD" on CNN.
(CNN) -- Stephanie Schroeder joined the U.S. Marine
Corps not long after 9/11. She was a 21-year-old with an associate's
degree when she reported for boot camp at Parris Island, South Carolina.
"I felt like it was the right thing to do," Schroeder recalls.
A year and a half later,
the Marines diagnosed her with a personality disorder and deemed her
psychologically unfit for the Corps.
Anna Moore enlisted in
the Army after 9/11 and planned to make a career of it. Moore was a
Patriot missile battery operator in Germany when she was diagnosed with a
personality disorder and dismissed from the Army.
Jenny McClendon was serving as a sonar operator on a Navy destroyer when she received her personality disorder diagnosis.
These women joined different branches of the military but they share a common experience:
Each received the psychiatric diagnosis and military discharge after reporting a sexual assault.
I'm not crazy. I am actually relatively normal.
Stephanie Schroeder
Stephanie Schroeder
"I'm not crazy," says Schroeder, who is married now, with two daughters. "I am actually relatively normal."
McClendon says she had a similar reaction.
"I remember thinking
this is absurd; this is ridiculous. How could I be emotionally unstable?
I'm very clear of mind, especially considering what had happened."
McClendon says. "It was a ludicrous diagnosis."
A similar pattern
CNN has interviewed
women in all branches of the armed forces, including the Coast Guard,
who tell stories that follow a similar pattern -- a sexual assault, a
command dismissive of the allegations and a psychiatric discharge.
Schroeder says a fellow
Marine followed her to the bathroom in April 2002. She says he then
punched her, ripped off her pants and raped her. When she reported what
happened, a non-commissioned officer dismissed the allegation, saying,
"'Don't come bitching to me because you had sex and changed your mind,'"
Schroeder recalls.
Moore says she was alone
in her barracks in October 2002 when a non-commissioned officer from
another battery tried to rape her. When she filled out forms to report
it, she says, her first sergeant, told her: "Forget about it. It never
happened," and tore up the paperwork.
"It felt like a punch in the gut," Moore says. "I couldn't trust my chain of command to ever back me up."
McClendon says she was
aboard a Navy destroyer at sea when a superior raped her on the midnight
to 2 a.m. watch. After reporting the attack, she was diagnosed with a
personality disorder and deemed unfit to serve.
"I was good enough to suit up and show up and serve, but I wasn't good enough after the fact," McClendon says.
Despite the Defense
Department's "zero tolerance" policy, there were 3,191 military sexual
assaults reported in 2011. Given that most sexual assaults are not
reported, the Pentagon estimates the actual number was probably closer
to 19,000.
The number of sexual assaults in the military is unacceptable.
U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta
U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta
"The number of sexual
assaults in the military is unacceptable," Defense Secretary Leon
Panetta said at a news conference in January. "Our men and women in
uniform put their lives on the line every day to keep America safe. We
have a moral duty to keep them safe from those who would attack their
dignity and their honor."
But Anu Bhagwati, a former company commander in the Marines and executive director of Service Women's Action Network,
a veterans advocacy group, says she sees a pattern of the military
using psychiatric diagnoses to get rid of women who report sexual
assaults.
"It's convenient to
sweep this under the rug. It's also extremely convenient to slap a false
diagnosis on a young woman ... and then just get rid of them so you
don't have to deal with that problem in your unit. And, unfortunately, a
lot of sexual assault survivors are considered problems," Bhagwati
says.
From 2001 to 2010, the
military discharged more than 31,000 service members because of
personality disorder, according to documents obtained under a Freedom of
Information Act request by the Vietnam Veterans of America.
Asked by CNN how many of
these cases involved sexual assault cases, the Defense Department says
it does not keep such figures, nor would the Pentagon comment on
individual cases.
The diagnoses
The latest edition of
the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, known as the
DSM-IV, defines a personality disorder as a long-standing, inflexible
pattern of maladaptive behavior and coping, beginning in adolescence or
early adulthood.
That would mean women
like Schroeder, Moore and McClendon had a pre-existing personality
disorder when they joined the military. Someone with personality
disorder tends to get fired from jobs, get in trouble with the law or at
school or is unable to maintain relationships.
"It makes absolutely no
sense medically for people to be diagnosed all of a sudden after being
sexually assaulted as an adult in the military to say 'No, you've had
this all along,'" says Bhagwati, of the Service Women's Action Network.
"These women have
clearly been able to function. They've made it through basic training.
They've made it through all the follow-on training. Many of them are
deployed overseas in war, and they've done fine there. But, when they're
sexually assaulted, and then report it, it seems very suspicious that
the military would suddenly stamp them with a pre-existing condition
that bars them from serving anymore."
Dr. Liza H. Gold, a
clinical professor of psychiatry at Georgetown University School of
Medicine, says it's a rule of thumb among psychiatrists not to diagnose
someone with a personality disorder in the middle of a traumatic
experience like a divorce, litigation or the aftermath of a sexual
assault.
The DSM-IV says: "When
personality changes emerge and persist after an individual has been
exposed to extreme stress, a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
should be considered."
Also, by definition, a personality disorder diagnosis cannot be caused by another psychiatric condition, such as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Gold says.
In 2003, when she
returned to Germany from a deployment in Israel, Moore says a new Army
counselor changed her diagnosis from severe depression to borderline
personality disorder after only a half-hour session.
Gold is not familiar
with Moore's case, but she says a personality disorder was not a
diagnosis that typically could be made quickly.
The numbers
Military records show
the personality disorder diagnosis is being used disproportionately on
women, according to military records obtained by Yale Law School's
Veterans Legal Services Clinic under a Freedom of Information Act
request.
--In the Army, 16% of all soldiers are women, but females constitute 24% of all personality disorder discharges.
--Air Force: women make up 21% of the ranks and 35% of personality disorder discharges.
--Navy: 17% of sailors are women and 26% of personality disorder discharges
--Marines: 7% of the Corps and 14% of personality disorder discharges
The records don't reflect how many of those women had reported sexual assault.
The cost
A personality diagnosis discharge can carry a heavy financial burden.
In the military's eyes, a
personality disorder diagnosis is a pre-existing condition and does not
constitute a service-related disability. That means sexual assault
victims with personality disorder discharges don't receive benefits from
the Department of Veterans Affairs to help with their trauma. They can
still apply for benefits, but it's considered an uphill battle.
There are other costs.
For example, members of the armed forces who receive a personality
disorder discharge lose education benefits under the GI Bill.
Moore, now 32 and
married, says the Army came after her for $2,800 of the enlistment bonus
she received when she signed up for six years. With interest and
penalties, the bill topped $6,000. Moore says she's still paying it off.
17-year vet Celeste Santana was diagnosed with a disorder and lost her pension after reporting a sexual assault.
Celeste Santana, a
former Navy lieutenant commander, lost her pension when she was
involuntarily separated from the military in 2011 after 17 years of
active duty -- three years short of being eligible to retire. Santana
says the Navy gave her an adjustment disorder after she reported being
sexual assaulted in the middle of the night at a forward operating base
in Helmand Province, Afghanistan. She says no medical evaluation ever
took place.
An adjustment disorder
is an excessive response to a stressful experience, typically lasting
three to six months. For example, Gold says, someone who is fired from a
job, stops eating, refuses to get out of bed and won't talk to anyone
might be suffering from an adjustment disorder.
Secondary injury
Veterans who talked to
CNN all say lack of military response to their reports of assault added
to their emotional trauma. Gold says therapists call this a "secondary
injury." McClendon, Moore and Schroeder each say they became suicidal.
Panayiota Bertzikis
received an adjustment disorder diagnosis and was forced out of the
Coast Guard in 2006 -- after reporting to her superiors that she had
been punched in the face and raped by a shipmate during an off-duty
hike.
When she reported the
attack, Bertzikis says the chief of her Coast Guard station ordered her
and her attacker to clean out an attic on base together and told to work
out their differences.
"I am the victim of this
crime, and then you report it, and then I felt like I was the one on
trial -- I was the one who did something wrong," Bertzikis says. "He got
a free pass. I was the one fighting to stay in."
Bhagwati, who runs the
Service Women's Action Network, says the sense of betrayal is profound
for sexual assault victims whose allegations are not taken seriously.
"Very commonly victims
will hear that they're lying whores. It's very common," Bhagwati says.
"That kind of betrayal deepens the trauma so, so much, and it's hard to
recover from that. I mean, it's akin to incest where you grow up with a
family, with someone you trust, admire and in many cases, salute, is
your perpetrator. It's a huge betrayal that often entails guilt,
embarrassment, shame. You're made to feel that you did something wrong
and you could have prevented it from happening."
In the civilian world,
sexual assault victims can quit their jobs, go to court, go to the
media, says J.D. Hamel, a Marine veteran and Yale Law student involved
at the Veterans Legal Services Clinic. If higher-ups don't follow-up on allegations, Hamel explains, there is no other recourse.
"If the command doesn't
deal with it, no one is going to deal with it," he says. "It's just a
very lonely position to be in. It's hard for people who have never been
in the military to realize how all-encompassing military life is."
Rep. Jackie Speier,
D-California, says the military has used personality and other
psychiatric diagnoses "almost robotically" to force women who report
sexual assaults out of the service.
"It's the default
position the military uses," says Speier, a member of the House Armed
Services Committee. "The problem we have in the military is the unit
commander is in charge of the entire process."
Speier has introduced
legislation that would take sexual assault cases out of the chain of
command and assign them to an autonomous office at the Pentagon.
Bhagwati says victims of sexual assault in the military should be able to sue for damages in civil court.
It's far too convenient to do the wrong thing now.
Anu Bhagwati, Service Women's Action Network
Anu Bhagwati, Service Women's Action Network
"Until there's a
deterrent, you're going to have far too much incentive to the average
commander, to the average perpetrator, to do the wrong thing," she says.
"It's far too convenient to do the wrong thing now."
Military response
The Pentagon has made changes in policy on personality disorder diagnoses and discharges.
Army guidelines enacted
in 2008 require commanders to review administrative separations, such as
personality and adjustment disorder discharges, for sexual assault
victims. The commander must assess whether the separation "appears to be
in retaliation" for reporting the sexual assault or involves a medical
condition like Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
After congressional
hearings in 2008 looking into Afghanistan and Iraq combat veterans who
received personality discharges, the Pentagon also changed the rules to
require a psychiatrist or PhD-level psychologist to diagnose personality
disorder on troops who "served or are currently serving in imminent
danger pay areas."
The new rules require
personality disorder diagnoses for combat veterans to be corroborated a
by a peer or higher-level mental health professional and endorsed by the
surgeon general of the relevant military branch. This added layer of
protection against misdiagnoses does not affect sexual assault victims.
Bertzikis started
blogging about her case and says she found other women -- and some men
-- who described similar experiences. She has started two websites:
stopmilitaryrape.org and mydutytospeak.com, a chance for victims of
military sexual assault to share their stories.
"For me, writing has been very helpful," Bertzikis says.
At his January news
conference, Secretary Panetta announced that for the first time service
members who reported a sexual assault would be allowed to make an
immediate request to transfer to a different unit. The commanding
officer would then have 72 hours to decide whether to grant the request.
Panetta also ordered an
assessment of the training that commanding officers and senior enlisted
personnel receive on sexual assault prevention and response. That report
is scheduled to be completed next month.
Moore and Schroeder each
say they'd still be in the military if the military had aggressively
pursued their attackers and allowed them to switch units. But Schroeder
is skeptical about the Pentagon's efforts.
"It's all just talk. It's for show," Schroeder says.
Bertzikis started and runs the Military Rape Crisis Center,
which helps victims of sexual assault in the military. She and
Schroeder have joined a lawsuit suing the Defense Department for
unspecified monetary damages for a culture that permitted sexual
assaults.
Asked by CNN about the lawsuit, the Defense Department says it does not comment on pending litigation.
What my chain of command did to me was cruel.
Anna Moore
Anna Moore
As for the personality
and adjustment disorder discharges, the Pentagon tells CNN: "We
encourage all separating service members who believe their discharges
were incorrectly characterized or processed to request adjudication
through their respective military department's Discharge Review Board
and Board for Correction of Military Records."
McClendon, 41, is
married and the mother of four. She teaches college humanities courses.
Two or three times a week, she says she's awakened by nightmares.
Schroeder, 30, is
getting a business degree and taking care of her daughters, who are in
second and third grade. She says she suffers from anxiety and depression
and is fighting the Department of Veterans Affairs for a PTSD
diagnosis.
Moore, 32, received a diagnosis of PTSD from the Veterans Affairs and is on full disability.
"I have nightmares all
the time and flashbacks and things like that," Moore says. "I'm still
paranoid of the outside world and how cruel people can be -- because
what my chain of command did to me was cruel and unnecessary." end quote from:
http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/14/health/military-sexual-assaults-personality-disorder/index.html
I think this is mostly a legal liability issue for the Government and an embarrassing situation that is trying to be swept under the rug. So, from a purely legal level of reducing liability I can see why the government does this, even though it is likely a horrific experience of being devalued as a person for the women raped and then called "Crazy" by their military branches of service. It is sort of like saying to women,
"If you didn't want to be raped why did you join the military in the first place?"
But another way to look at it is look at all the killed and wounded men and women in this war both externally and internally (PTSD). So, it also could be said from a governmental legal point of view,
"If you didn't want to be killed or maimed or get PTSD or raped why did you join the military?"
So maybe for a realistic point of view regarding all men and women in the military, "Expect to be killed, maimed, get (PTSD) or raped or anything else because that often happens to people in the military from the U.S."
But even in the U.S. for people who drive cars one must also realize that there is a potential to die, be maimed or to maim someone else accidentally while even driving a car on any day of our lives. Life is a risk no matter what you do, it is all a matter of degree and of what degree of risk you are willing to take with your lives.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/14/health/military-sexual-assaults-personality-disorder/index.html
I think this is mostly a legal liability issue for the Government and an embarrassing situation that is trying to be swept under the rug. So, from a purely legal level of reducing liability I can see why the government does this, even though it is likely a horrific experience of being devalued as a person for the women raped and then called "Crazy" by their military branches of service. It is sort of like saying to women,
"If you didn't want to be raped why did you join the military in the first place?"
But another way to look at it is look at all the killed and wounded men and women in this war both externally and internally (PTSD). So, it also could be said from a governmental legal point of view,
"If you didn't want to be killed or maimed or get PTSD or raped why did you join the military?"
So maybe for a realistic point of view regarding all men and women in the military, "Expect to be killed, maimed, get (PTSD) or raped or anything else because that often happens to people in the military from the U.S."
But even in the U.S. for people who drive cars one must also realize that there is a potential to die, be maimed or to maim someone else accidentally while even driving a car on any day of our lives. Life is a risk no matter what you do, it is all a matter of degree and of what degree of risk you are willing to take with your lives.
No comments:
Post a Comment