ISIL more dangerous now or would it be more dangerous to U.S. in other form?
answer:
I think it is less dangerous to the United States directly now. However, if it is forced back into just being a terrorist group without land to get money from, I think it then would be more dangerous to the United States Homeland and the homelands of everyone in the coalition in revenge for ending the Islamic State at some point in the future.
However, right now, it is so dangerous to every government in the Middle East's ongoing existence I don't think many people are worrying about this: YET! Also, it is so dangerous towards the extinction of every minority from Shia to Christian to Yazidi to whatever, people aren't thinking this way much yet. The main business is not to have all Shias and Christians and Yazidis in the Middle East go extinct permanently at this point because there might be a danger of this, especially in Iraq and Syria and possibly Lebanon.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- This is what the code looks like displayed on a page
- 158,008 visits to intuitivefred888
- Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan sees clues to the U.S. consumer in the pet food aisle
- Couple reaches agreement with daughter's biological parents after alleged IVF mix-up
- is a part of death valley below sea level?
- Death Valley: one of the lowest and hottest and driest places on the planet
- The Fall of the Western Roman Empire from Wikipedia
- Electrical Transformers
- After receiving the Kalachakra Initation from the Dalai lama in Bodhgaya in December of 1985 I began writing about the King of Shambala
- When I started teaching myself the HTML Computer language:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment