ISIL more dangerous now or would it be more dangerous to U.S. in other form?
answer:
I think it is less dangerous to the United States directly now. However, if it is forced back into just being a terrorist group without land to get money from, I think it then would be more dangerous to the United States Homeland and the homelands of everyone in the coalition in revenge for ending the Islamic State at some point in the future.
However, right now, it is so dangerous to every government in the Middle East's ongoing existence I don't think many people are worrying about this: YET! Also, it is so dangerous towards the extinction of every minority from Shia to Christian to Yazidi to whatever, people aren't thinking this way much yet. The main business is not to have all Shias and Christians and Yazidis in the Middle East go extinct permanently at this point because there might be a danger of this, especially in Iraq and Syria and possibly Lebanon.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- It looks like I wrote this in 2002 which is the year after 9-11
- Transhumanism from Wikipedia
- Cancer rates 1900 to 2000 and beyond
- Ray Kurzweil created the idea of the Singularity in regard to Artificial intelligence. He believes it will come by 2050
- As midterms near, grocery prices remain top of mind for many Americans
- This is what the code looks like displayed on a page
- How to Survive a Potential Recession
- Conservative Backlash at Jeanine Pirro
- doctor visits due to flu reach highest level in 30 years
- Climate change, new construction mean more ruinous fires
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment