In some ways I think they both are right. Will opening things kill some people? Of course.
Will keeping things closed cause some to starve to death? Of course.
It's a balance and the whole world is in this position now of sort of:
"Damned if they do and damned if they don't"
But, in the end it is likely that Sweden Got it right to begin with.
They didn't shut anything down but their universities and in the end that might be the best outcome long term.
Why?
Because here's the thing. Within 5 years EVERYONE on earth will either be dead from coronavirus or have a vaccine from coronavirus or be immune to coronavirus.
There are no more options than that for almot 8 billion humans on earth.
People cannot just stay in their homes the rest of their lives. 90% of the people can't at least.
So, this is the problem. Stay closed too long and people starve to death or open too quick and too many die of coronavirus.
There is no one right and perfect decision in any of this.
The whole world has to bite the bullet on this one!
IT's the worst thing worldwide in my lifetime and I remember 1950.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- This is what the code looks like displayed on a page
- 158,008 visits to intuitivefred888
- Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan sees clues to the U.S. consumer in the pet food aisle
- Couple reaches agreement with daughter's biological parents after alleged IVF mix-up
- is a part of death valley below sea level?
- The Fall of the Western Roman Empire from Wikipedia
- Death Valley: one of the lowest and hottest and driest places on the planet
- Electrical Transformers
- After receiving the Kalachakra Initation from the Dalai lama in Bodhgaya in December of 1985 I began writing about the King of Shambala
- Trump tapping Bill Pulte to lead ODNI has endangered renewal of the spy program.
No comments:
Post a Comment