begin quote from:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/israel-benjamin-netanyahu-arrest-warrant-hamas-gaza-uk-challenge-court-rcna163790
U.K. government drops challenge to International Criminal Court over Netanyahu arrest warrant
Britain’s new government said on Friday it was dropping its predecessor’s query of the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) jurisdiction to issue an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The ICC’s chief prosecutor has requested warrants for Netanyahu and his defense minister, Yoav Gallant, on suspicion of war crimes, infuriating Israel and irritating its closest ally, the United States. He requested similar warrants for three leaders of the Palestinian militant group Hamas.
Britain, an ICC member state, had asked the court for observations on whether it could exercise jurisdiction over Israelis “in circumstances where Palestine cannot exercise criminal jurisdiction over Israeli nationals (under) the Oslo Accords”.
But since then, the center-left Labour Party has taken power from the Conservatives in an election, and Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s spokesperson told reporters the new government would drop the query “in line with our long-standing position that this is a matter for the court to decide on”.
“The government believes very strongly in the rule of law, both internationally and domestically, and the separation of powers.”
While the Conservatives frequently chafed against supranational jurisdictions during their 14 years in power, not least the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights, Starmer, a former lawyer, has struck a different tone.
Last week he told European leaders that his government would have a “profound respect for international law.”
The ICC, which handles war crimes and crimes against humanity, has been investigating both sides in the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians since 2021.
In that year, the ICC ruled that it did have jurisdiction after Palestinian authorities signed up to the court in 2015, having been made a United Nations observer state.
That decision, however, left a ruling on the interpretation of the 1993 Oslo Accords regarding Palestinian jurisdiction over Israeli nationals for a later stage in the proceedings.
No comments:
Post a Comment