Note: I'm not trying to be offensive in this article I'm just trying to be logical, reasonable and intuitive.
If more Superstorms are coming to the U.S. we might be better off with a President like Obama or Clinton (either one) than a Romney or a Bush because Obama and the Clintons advocate wind power and solar power, (which reduces greenhouse gases which likely help cause superstorms in the first place), and because with Obama or either of the Clintons it is more likely that FEMA and the Government might get involved in building the $10 Billion breakwater to stop more storms from hitting NYC and Long Island and other breakwaters to protect the Northeast and other areas from Coastal erosion like is done in the Netherlands and Japan around Tokyo. The other reason we might be better off with a President like Obama or the Clintons is that less people would tend to die as more Superstorms hit because of Government projects like Breakwaters and because we would still have a FEMA which we would not under Romney.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Because of fighting in Ukraine and Israel Bombing Iran I thought I should share this EMP I wrote in 2011
- "There is nothing so good that no bad may come of it and nothing so bad that no good may come of it": Descartes
- Keri Russell pulls back the curtain on "The Diplomat" (season 2 filming now for Netflix)
- Historicity of Jesus-Wikipedia
- US intelligence officials make last-ditch effort to sound the alarm over foreign election interference
- The ultra-lethal drones of the future | New York Post 2014 article
- most read articles from KYIV Post
- reprint of: Drones very small to large
- Husband dies after Maine couple is lost in woods for days, wife may have survived thanks to dog
- Israel strikes banks across Lebanon to hit Hezbollah's finances
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment