I think this is a great idea mentioned in Kissinger's new book "World Order". However, getting from point A to point B is another problem entirely.
Even if one party wants to communicate it doesn't mean other parties will be agreeable to this.
For example, the most extreme case of this is ISIL or ISIS which believes killing everyone other than their point of view as a way to die while going to heaven. So, with ISIL (ISIS) there can be no compromise at all which means diplomacy has no usefulness against this foe. So, engaging with civilizations requires both parties to want more peace than war.
This will not be possible with ISIL(ISIS) ever. Since their goal is to kill 9/10 or more of the human race rendering ISIL(ISIS) extinct is the only present answer available. Though this likely is not possible it might be possible to render ISIL(ISIS) 9/10 or more extinct within the next 10 to 25 years.
But, at present more young people are joining ISIL(ISIS) worldwide than are dying per day, week or month by those who oppose ISIL(ISIS) worldwide.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- A Tragic Loss | Tesla Motors
- These Are The Possible Future Leaders Of Britain
- Transhumanism from Wikipedia
- It looks like I wrote this in 2002 which is the year after 9-11
- Cancer rates 1900 to 2000 and beyond
- Ray Kurzweil created the idea of the Singularity in regard to Artificial intelligence. He believes it will come by 2050
- How to Survive a Potential Recession
- doctor visits due to flu reach highest level in 30 years
- Climate change, new construction mean more ruinous fires
- 'First to sue': Opposing Trump's desire to end birthright citizenship is personal for this AG
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment