But, what is this Irresistable Force? The American people's need not to die without Healthcare or watch their parents or Grandparents die en Masse without health care.
This likely would be the irresistable Force.
So, what is going to happen?
It's anyone's guess at this point.
My guess is that Putin will Attack Mainland Europe with Missiles and Drones during this battle between Democrats and Republicans.
I don't think Trump is ready for that to happen at all.
He might be really caught with his pants down this time on the world stage.
What happens then?
This is the thing no one is really sure about right now.
What might be coming is actually World War III starting in Europe by Putin.
The problem appears to be for Democrats that they simply cannot give into Republicans and have anyone take them seriously as a party anymore. The Battle Lines are drawn.
So, I think expecting this Government shutdown to be a long one is a good bet.
However, it's also true that we live in very strange times too. So, on another level almost anything goes here.
Has Trump met his match in Congressional Democrats? It's hard to say after Trump was inaugurated because he has broken every rule in the book. His Actions have been so crazy that I for one would not be surprised if Trump arrests all Democratic Members of Congress for not agreeing with him or even putting all Democratic Members of Congress in front of Firing Squads because it suits him.
So, at this point Almost anything Goes it seems. Nothing at all would surprise me right now. And I think most of the world has no idea what will happen next either.
A
group of retired judges said Trump "continues to corruptly abuse the
power of his office" by directing the Justice Department to target "his
critics and his perceived political enemies."
Officers
stopped the vehicle but declined to write a ticket as "citation books
don't have a box for 'robot,'" the San Bruno Police Department wrote on
Facebook.
Open-air
sites will remain open to the public, but buildings that require
staffing, such as visitor centers or attractions like the Washington
Monument, will be closed.
Maria Branyas Morera was the world’s oldest person when she died at 117 last year. Now, scientists have searched within her genes for the answers to her long life.
Before
she died, Branyas allowed doctors to collect samples of her blood,
saliva, urine and stool to shed light on her biology and what had
allowed her to live for so long. “We wanted to learn from her particular
case to benefit other people,” says Manel Esteller, a physician at the University of Barcelona who led the work, to Mariana Lenharo at Nature.
Esteller and his colleagues compared Branyas’ profile with that of
other Iberian women. (The supercentenarian was born to a Spanish family
in the United States and spent most of her life in Spain.) The findings,
which were published in the journal Cell Reports Medicine
on September 24, point to a combination of genetic luck and lifestyle
choices. Branyas did not smoke or drink, she exercised regularly, and
she had an active social life. This all certainly helped, Esteller tells
Ian Sample at the Guardian.
Did you know? Who was the oldest person to ever live?
Jeanne Louise Calment of France holds the record for the oldest verified person. Born on February 21, 1875, she lived until August 4, 1997, making her 122 years old.
At
the same time, she had variants in her genes that are associated with
longevity and that protect against dementia, heart disease, diabetes and
other illnesses. “She had cells that seemed younger than her age,” adds
Esteller to Gina Kolata at the New York Times.
Her gut microbiome was also like that of a younger person, the study found. She had lots of Bifidobacterium, beneficial
bacteria that probably got a boost from the three servings of yogurt
she reportedly ate every day. Those microbes likely also protected her
against inflammation.
“It shows that maybe a dietary intervention can be associated not
only with avoiding obesity and other pathologies, but also with
prolonged life, acting through the microbiome gut landscape,” Esteller
explains to James Woodford at New Scientist.
Still,
eating three yogurts a day will not necessarily make for a long life.
Other researchers caution that the results of a study of one person
can’t be extrapolated to entire populations. Richard Faragher, a biogerontologist at the University of Brighton in England, tells New Scientist
that to prove Branyas’ long life wasn’t just the result of luck, the
researchers would have had to show that other members of her family also
had long lives.
Mary Armanios, an oncologist and geneticist at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, is also skeptical, reports the New York Times.
“The genetics of longevity are notoriously confusing,” she says to the
outlet. It’s hard to predict how long someone will live—when researchers
looked for variants linked to a long life, they compared the genes of
centenarians with those of younger people. But there’s no way to know
how long those younger people will live.
She also points out that other factors, like socioeconomics, can
affect how long someone lives, even if they have a good genetic profile.
“I do think there are obviously bad genetics that limit life span,” she
adds. “But I am not sure good genetics are sufficient to overcome
socioeconomic limitations.”
Esteller,
for his part, hopes to use the information gleaned from the study to
develop medications that can help older people stay healthy. “We can
develop drugs to reproduce the effects of good genes,” he explains to
the Guardian. “Maria’s parents gave her very good genes, but we cannot choose our parents.”
The point is that often enough people who are enlightened need to be away from where the nukes and missiles might fall to restart the human race with 90% or more of us gone from Nukes or Missiles and drones one day.
So, people who live more remotely might be the enlightened ones who save mankind from extinction by everything they know (all their applied Wisdom and knowledge about everything).
Just like in ancient times in Asia and Europe and other places the truly wise people "Left for the Hills" before most of the uneducated people were wiped out from marauding bands who killed and raped everyone they found along the way.
Later after hopefully the marauders left with many bodies behind with all buildings burned down the truly wise ones returned to teach their wisdom so the human race and cultures of that area could return from oblivion of mass deaths.
So, a part of enlightenment is knowing when to be somewhere else in order for everything you care about to go on and return one day.
By God's Grace
Note: Often time when oblivion might occur isn't useful to talk about to others simply because it is all probabilities.
However, when I tried to tell people about what became the Loma Prieta Earthquake in 1989 in the fall often people afterwards when it happened were scared and didn't want to talk to me. One lady had a million dollar plus house that was torn in half by the quake and never wanted to speak to me again.
However, I didn't cause the quake I just knew it was coming and simply got myself and my family out of the way of it so we all survived it okay.
On
the first day of the 2013 government shutdown, Sen. Chuck Schumer,
D-New York, had a message for Republicans who refused to fund the
government unless Congress defunded Obamacare: Hostage-taking would not
work.
"As we
said a thousand times, we are happy to discuss how to fund the
government, but not with a gun to our heads," Schumer said on the Senate
floor.
"You
are not going to get us to give in to extortion," he continued. "You are
not going to take, as hostage, millions of innocent Americans and
succeed in getting us to do something you want, and we don't, and they
don't.
That shutdown ended after 16 days and Republicans had little to show for it.
House
Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck
Schumer talk to reporters outside the West Wing of the White House,
Sept. 29, 2025, in Washington.
AP Photo/Alex Brandon
Twelve
years later, Schumer and Democrats, now in the minority, are staring
down another government shutdown -- but one that might be of their own
making.
In the
Senate, Democrats are withholding support for a measure to keep the
government funded at current levels unless Republicans extend subsidies
that help some Americans pay for health care through the Affordable Care
Act, which are set to expire at year's end, among other demands.
It's a page out of the playbook pioneered by the GOP and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and used repeatedly since 2013.
But
for the first time, Democrats are poised to oppose funding the
government. Schumer and House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries left a
White House meeting with President Donald Trump and top GOP leaders
without an agreement on the path forward.
"Under
a shutdown, the Trump administration would have wide-ranging authority
to deem whole agencies, programs and personnel nonessential, furloughing
staff members with no promise they would ever be rehired," Schumer wrote in the New York Times, explaining his vote.
Now,
the Senate minority leader has reversed himself, but denying that the
pivot is due to political pressure -- instead arguing that the deal cut
in the spring hasn't stopped the Trump administration from pushing out
federal workers.
"We're
hearing from the American people that they need help on health care,"
Schumer said Sunday on "Meet the Press." "As for these massive layoffs,
guess what? Simple one sentence answer, they're doing it anyway."
Vice
President JD Vance talks to reporters outside the White House, Sept.
29, 2025, in Washington, as Director of the Office of Management and
Budget, Russell Vought, Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader
John Thune listen.
Alex Brandon/AP
While
the American public has sided with Democrats in past shutdowns, it has
been in fights in which Republicans tried to extract policy changes.
After
the shutdown over defunding Obamacare in 2013, 53% of respondents to an
ABC News/Washington Post poll blamed Republicans for the shutdown,
compared to 29% who blamed then-President Barack Obama, and 15% who
blamed both sides equally.
After
Trump led Republicans into a futile shutdown to extract border wall
funding from the Democrat-led House in January 2018, 48% of respondents
blamed the president and Republicans for the shutdown, compared to 28%
who faulted Democrats, according to an ABC News/Washington Post poll.
With
roles reversed, Democrats could be in line to get blamed for a new
shutdown. And Republicans in charge of both chambers could force
messaging votes that underscore Democrats' opposition to funding the
government and the services its provides.
But
this may not be a typical funding fight, given the Trump
administration's threats to use the shutdown to fire even more federal
workers, and ongoing efforts to block spending agreements already
approved by Congress over policy disputes.
Many
Democratic voters have also pushed their leaders to take on the Trump
administration more forcefully, and a shutdown could be a venue for
doing so, despite the potential impact on government services.
If
Congress can't reach a deal, and the government shuts down, it's not
clear how long an impasse will last. It's also not clear how long voters
will hold it against Washington leaders, more than a year away from the
2026 midterms.
But all eyes will be on congressional leaders who now find themselves in unexpected roles.