Wednesday, March 29, 2023

Artificial Intelligence (the way it is presently being used) is potentially suicidal for the human race

I can remember watching "Terminator" in 1984 and because I studied computer programming and computer technology in college starting in 1966 I knew full well that "Terminator" wasn't just a movie but also a harbinger (a warning) to future mankind. Actually, when I saw Terminator(1984) I cried because I found it to be so poignant and on the money.

However, reality often comes in a different form than any of us expected. For example, Fake Videos recently I believed could (and still can) end all government sort of like Trump being a criminal. If you can fake anyone saying anything and make enough people believe it then human civilization is over in a nuclear blast. (theoretically).

So, believing anything you see in videos anymore goes out the window for all of us potentially.

Now we have things like

Introducing ChatGPT

Nov 30, 2022 — ChatGPT is a sibling model to InstructGPT, which is trained to follow an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response.
 
and we have other AI forms coming out almost weekly. How long before people start having their lives ruined by these Artificial intelligence forms.
 
Elon Musk and other professionals writing about how this is incredibly dangerous for everyone on earth are absolutely right. AI has absolutely no knowledge about consequences of any AI's actions anywhere.
 
So, imagine thousands of mass shooters shooting wild shots into members of the human race at random.
 
This is basically what the forms of ChatGPT do every day now everywhere on earth.
 
If you don't believe me try out ChatGPT for yourself and see what the possibilities are for death and mischief with these (Artificial human programs with no consequences for anyone) involved.
 
How do you know this won't lead to the end of the human race? You Don't!
 
No one does because there are no checks and balances at all.
 
It's sort of like setting a Tesla to drive automatically with no human at all on board. I'm not sure if this has been done yet in reality but people likely could die (who are not on board such a Tesla) anywhere on earth. 

It would become sort of like a cruise missile driving to some location to be blown up along the ground.

ChatGPT and other AIs are sort of like millions of cruise missiles doing "I don't know what?".

 

Biden: World 'turning the tide' after backslide on democracy

 begin quote from:
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden on Wednesday offered an optimistic outlook on the health of democracy worldwide, ...

Major storm heads east; 13 states on alert for strong winds, heavy snow

begin quote from:

 ABC News10hMajor storm heads east; 13 states on alert for strong winds, heavy snow

Thirteen states are on alert for strong winds and heavy snow as a major storm moves east. A major storm hitting the ...

Ukraine's Zelenskyy is 'ready' for Chinese leader to visit

 begin quote from:
ON A TRAIN FROM SUMY TO KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — Ukraine's president invited his powerful Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, to ...

People who are psychologically androgynous tend to survive in the world better

 And I'm not talking AT ALL about sexual preferences. This is true of everyone.  Why is this?

I remember when I was at UCSC and we took a test to see which masculine and feminine traits we all had. Of course this is a psychological test and a girl sitting next to me was upset that she was considered Psychologically Androgynous by this test. 

I told her that people who are balanced between masculine and feminine psychological attributes tend to survive in the world better.

I told her that I had been trained both to shoot a weapon by age 8 and to be proficient at shooting anything by age 10 but I also had been raised to be a Mystical Christian Minister and so I was very polite. My politeness also came from being born in Seattle which shares many of the extremely polite ways of being of Canadians or people from England.

So, the point I was trying to make to her because I was about 40 then was that understanding that you can be strong like an oak tree or bend like a willow tree when you need to likely meant you could potentially survive ANYTHING life would throw at you during your life time.

I have watched many Rambo types of men and clinging vine types of women be destroyed on the rocks of life. But, what if you are Rambo and everything else in between? And capable of "like an actor" being any person you need to survive any situation that arises?

Survival isn't just about being able to be Rambo, it is knowing when to walk the other way so you stay alive from many situations in life.

So, being psychologically both Rambo and polite shall we say is how people survive their lives to old age.

Some times you need to be kick ass and some times you need to walk away or be polite.

After all, the whole basis of worldwide culture is basically politeness.

Politeness is why we all don't kill each other the first time we meet someone new that is different from us in any way.

When I look back now and look at today I see that today if I was young I likely couldn't afford to have children until I was at least 45 and successful

  "The older you have your children the longer you will tend to live" is a true statement on many levels.

And if you look around the world, especially at places like Japan and S. Korea and China where people are not even replacing themselves with such a low birth rate this is a part of what is going on.

The people's quality of life so drops when they have the expense of Children that is sucks any joy or happiness out of their lives struggling to raise children in this world economic era. And this isn't just true here in the U.S. now but also worldwide.

Some of the places on earth people might survive better this century are Canada, Alaska and Siberia. Why?

 Because of global climate changes.

As the world heats up the most extreme changes likely will be around the equator or at the poles. So, finding a "Sweet spot" that doesn't get too cold or too hot year around to grow food or flood out or drought out is going to be everyone's quest who survives on earth this century.

To simply stay somewhere because you like to be there will be ONLY a choice the rich make and survive it.

This is what this century looks like now.

It's true that the wealthiest can survive almost anywhere on earth and be okay simply because they can drive a car or truck or fly a plane or take a yacht to anywhere they need to be within minutes or hours of a hurricane or a drought or a flood. 

But, most people simply are not going to survive what is going to happen this century when it hits because they just don't have enough wealth to survive what is coming worldwide.

Only the richest and most survival oriented among mankind are going to survive what is coming for us all this century.

Just remember the average temperature at the north pole about 1 million years ago was 76 degrees Fahrenheit at the North Pole. We might be heading back to this slowly or quickly once again.

When you have an average temperature like this usually you have a range mostly of between 60 and 90 degrees Fahrenheit in a range like this year around.

It took almost 1 million years of ferns then to suck up enough CO2 around the world to make it like it was during the 20th century. Ancient prehistoric ferns are one of the best plants to suck up CO2 around that there are on planet earth.


Crucial Antarctic Ocean Circulation headed for Collapse

 

About 30,500,000 results (0.46 seconds) 
Melting ice in the Antarctic is not just raising sea levels but slowing down the circulation of deep ocean water with vast implications for the global climate and for marine life, a new study warns.7 hours ago

Crucial Antarctic ocean circulation heading for collapse if planet-warming pollution remains high, scientists warn - KEYT 

begin quote from:

8 hours ago — Crucial Antarctic ocean circulation heading for collapse if planet-warming pollution remains high, scientists warn.
8 hours ago — Crucial Antarctic ocean circulation heading for collapse if planet-warming pollution remains high, scientists warn.
 

Crucial Antarctic ocean circulation heading for collapse if planet-warming pollution remains high, scientists warn

An Adélie penguin stands on melting ice in Antarctica on February 7, 2022.
Brisbane, Australia CNN  — 

Melting ice in the Antarctic is not just raising sea levels but slowing down the circulation of deep ocean water with vast implications for the global climate and for marine life, a new study warns.

Led by scientists from the University of New South Wales and published Wednesday in the journal Nature, the peer-reviewed study modeled the impact of melting Antarctic ice on deep ocean currents that work to flush nutrients from the sea floor to fish near the surface.

Three years of computer modeling found the Antarctic overturning circulation – also known as abyssal ocean overturning – is on track to slow 42% by 2050 if the world continues to burn fossil fuels and produce high levels of planet-heating pollution.

 

A slow down is expected to speed up ice melt and potentially end an ocean system that has helped sustain life for thousands of years.

“The projections we have make it look like the Antarctic overturning would collapse this century,” said Matthew England, deputy director of the Australian Research Council’s Centre for Excellence in Antarctic Science, who coordinated the study.

“In the past, these overturning circulations changed over the course of 1,000 years or so, and we’re talking about changes within a few decades. So it is pretty dramatic,” he said.

Most previous studies have focused on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), the system of currents that carry warm water from the tropics into the North Atlantic. The cold, saltier water then sinks and flows south.

Its Southern Ocean equivalent is less studied but does an important job moving nutrient-dense water north from Antarctica, past New Zealand and into the North Pacific Ocean, the North Atlantic and Indian Ocean, the report’s authors said in a briefing.

The circulation of deep ocean water is considered vital for the health of the sea – and plays an important role in sequestering carbon absorbed from the atmosphere.

According to the report, while a slowdown of the AMOC would mean the deep Atlantic Ocean would get colder, the slower circulation of dense water in the Antarctic means the deepest waters of the Southern Ocean will warm up.

“One of the concerning things of this slowdown is that there can be feedback to further ocean warming at the base of the ice shelves around Antarctica. And that would lead to more ice melt, reinforcing or amplifying the original change,” England said.

How does it work

The surface of the ocean around Antarctica freezes in winter and and melts back in summer.

As global temperatures rise, Antarctic ice is expected to melt faster, but that doesn’t mean the circulation of deep water will increase – in fact the opposite, scientists said.

In a healthy system, the cold and salty – or dense – consistency of melted Antarctic ice allows it to sink to the deepest layer of the ocean. From there it sweeps north, carrying carbon and higher levels of oxygen than might otherwise be present in water around 4,000 meters deep.

As the current moves northward, it agitates deep layers of debris on the ocean floor – remains of decomposing sea life thick with nutrients – that feed the bottom of the food chain, scientists said.

In certain areas, mostly south of Australia in the Southern Ocean and in the tropics, this nutrient-rich cold water moves toward the surface in a process called upwelling, distributing the nutrients to higher layers of the ocean, England said.

However, Wednesday’s study found that as global temperatures warm, melting sea ice “freshens” the water around Antarctica, diluting its saltiness and raising its temperature, meaning it’s less dense and doesn’t sink to the bottom as efficiently as it once did.

The report’s co-author, Steve Rintoul from Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation and the Australian Antarctic Program Partnership, said sea life in waters worldwide rely on nutrients brought back up to the surface, and that the Antarctic overturning is a key component of that upwelling of nutrients.

“We know that nutrients exported from the Southern Ocean in other current systems support about three quarters of global phytoplankton production – the base of the food chain,” he said.

“We’ve shown that the sinking of dense water near Antarctica will decline by 40% by 2050. And it’ll be sometime between 2050 and 2100 that we start to see the impacts of that on surface productivity.”

England added: “People born today are going to be around then. So, it’s certainly stuff that will challenge societies in the future.”

Climate change warning

Fishing boats at a floating fish farm off Rongcheng, China.

The report’s authors say the slowing of the Antarctic ocean overturning has other knock-on effects for the planet – for example, it could shift rain bands in the tropics by as much as 1,000 kilometers (621 miles).

“Shut it down completely and you get this reduction of rainfall in one band south of the equator and an increase in the band to the north. So we could see impacts on rainfall in the tropics,” said England.

Earlier this month, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warned in its latest report that the impacts of rising global temperatures were more severe than expected. Without immediate and deep changes, the world is hurtling toward increasingly dangerous and irreversible consequences of climate change, it added.

The IPCC report found that the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels was still possible, but it’s becoming harder to achieve the longer the world fails to cut carbon pollution.

England points out that the IPCC predictions don’t include ice melt from Antarctic ice sheets and shelves.

“That’s a very significant component of change that’s already underway around Antarctica with more to come in the next few decades,” England said.

Rintoul said the study was another urgent warning on top of all the ones that have come before it.

“Even though the direct effect on fisheries through reduced nutrient supply might take decades to play out, we will commit ourselves to that future with the choices we make over the next decade.”

 


Elon Musk and several other technologists call for a pause on training of AI systems

 begin quote from:

 

it's no big surprise but most of the human race is committing suicide this century and the murder weapon is Global Warming

However, it's important to note that this has been going on for at least 10,000 to 25,000 years ever since people started farming and using slash and burn techniques. The other factor is burning wood likely too (even though this has always been mitigated by forest fires around the world burning 365 days a year before mankind started putting them out. So, fires actually are a part of the world ecosystem caused by lightning strikes around the world. So, when we put out lightning caused fires to some degree we are interfering with the world's ecosystem balance too.

So, maybe we have to think about how the world stays in ecological balance rather than how the human race stays in balance for any human beings to survive this at all this century.

 Brightest gamma-ray burst ever seen a 1-in-10,000-years event that's 'absolutely monstrous,' scientists say

 Brightest gamma-ray burst ever seen a 1-in-10,000-years event that's 'absolutely monstrous,' scientists say

An extragalactic outburst whose light hurtled through the inner solar system last fall was 70 times brighter than any other such eruption that scientists have observed, researchers report. Radiation ...

I'm thinking the kind of lead apron you use in a dentist's office to shield you from x-rays might work to shield passengers in an electric Vehicle

I have read many stories already about people having done this to their hybrids or electric vehicles. It would be a lot of work but basically you would need to (at the very least) put lead shielding directly between any electric motors (or generators if you are in a hybrid too) because both generators put out electromagnetic radiation when they generate and electric motors put out electromagnetic radiation when they are used at all. However, it's also true that the faster a motor is spinning (powering) the more electromagnetic radiation is going out in all directions. So, theoretically at least, you would get more radiation at 120 miles per hour in a Tesla than you would at say 10 to 30 miles per hour simply because there are no gears on a Tesla and the amount of radiation would likely have to do with how fast that electric motor is spinning in it's single gear forward or backwards. But, forwards you are going to be doing 30 to 70 miles per hour most of the time so this is when the maximum radiation would be received by the driver and passengers of the vehicle.

I think that driving in any electric car or hybrid might be like taping 100 cell phones to your body on your head and heart and other parts of your body including your reproductive organs while the smartphone was on whenever you drive. So, if you wonder why you might have headaches or be sterilized this could be it over time or when you have a heart attack or stroke.

Whenever I see a man with a smartphone in his heart shirt pocket I wonder how long before he has a heart attack or heart problems or dies. This is just how I think about all this. But, someone like this most of the time is sort of like a smoker of cigarettes. You can't tell them anything until it's too late for them to survive. 

However, passengers might be protected in Hybrids and electric cars by lead radiation shielding surrounding the passengers compartment

For example, if I ever bought a hybrid or electric car or truck the very first thing I would do would be to install lead shielding completely surrounding the passenger compartments of the vehicle. You especially need shielding between you and any electric motors (you and the passengers) because when the motors are used they are spewing one degree of electromagnetic radiation or another 360 degrees in every direction. this is also true in hybrids when electricity is generated because a generator and an electric motor are basically the same thing. The only real difference is the generator is spun by some other force to make electricity like water or gasoline or diesel power and the electric motor receives the power through a battery or a generator. This is the only really big difference between a generator and an electric motor.

Inflation is killing people by higher and higher numbers worldwide every day now

 This is one reason why the Federal Reserve is working so hard to fight inflation here in the U.S. Other nations have already gone down the rabbit hole of inflation and we likely are going to see one government collapse after another because of inflation worldwide at this point (even though it should be said here that relatively speaking on a worldwide basis there are less wars now than ever before in my lifetime. It is more about individuals going off and becoming mass shooters worldwide but nations are tending to be more stable (except regarding inflation) than ever before in my lifetime. (and I have been alive now since around 1950.

The following definition is why I won't buy an Electric Car or hybrid. Because Electromagnetic radiation affects human health

 In physics, electromagnetic radiation (EMR) consists of waves of the electromagnetic (EM) field, which propagate through space and carry momentum and electromagnetic radiant energy.[1] Types of EMR include radio waves, microwaves, infrared, (visible) light, ultraviolet, X-rays, and gamma rays, all of which are part of the electromagnetic spectrum.[2]

end partial quote from:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation

Though it's true that you aren't getting as much radiation directly every moment you are riding in an Electric Car or Hybrid, it is true that you are getting more radiation from a hybrid than from an Electric Car like a Tesla.

Why is this?

Because radiation is generated two times in a hybrid but only once in an Electric Car because the Electric Car is filled usually when you are not there through a cable and likely because it has already been generated at a power station you don't get radiation from recharging your batteries in this way. You would have to be at the power station standing next to a turbine maybe at a dam that is breaking the magnetic fields of magnets to experience radiation at that point.

So, a Hybrid is more dangerous to a human body than an Electric car because of this because a hybrid burns you as it burns gas to generate the electricity and then it burns you again when you actually use that energy in your hybrid electric motors.

However, if you want to drive East of California, Oregon and Washington where there actually are the Tesla and other charging stations you probably need a hybrid to do this rather than an Electric Car (at least at this point). 

For example, I wouldn't worry as much about people over 50 driving in Hybrids or Electric Cars simply because they likely won't live long enough to be seriously injured or die from the effects of hybrids or electric cars. It's the children or grandchildren of these people that I most worry about who will suffer the worst effects of Electromagnetic radiation. I'm thinking it will come to them as leucemia, Bone cancer, and other types of blood and bone and neurological disorders because of excess Electromagnetic radiation.

Also, we are having X level Coronal mass ejections lately from the sun which will tend to make all these things worse in their electromagnetic negative effects upon all life upon earth right now.

To understand this better visit: Spaceweather.com