- Wall Street Journal - 3 hours agoScientists have subjected Albert Einstein's famous theory of gravity to its toughest real-world test so ... Theory of Einstein's Proved Right—Again ...
- Wall Street Journal - 8 hours ago
Einstein Proved Right on Gravity — Again - snopes.com
message.snopes.com › Non-UL Chat › Techno-Babble21 hours ago - 1 post - 1 authorEinstein Proved Right on Gravity — Again Techno-Babble.Einstein Proved Right on Gravity—Again - Wall Street Journal ...
www.nasw.org/einstein-proved-right-gravity—again-wall-street-journalEinstein Proved Right on Gravity—Again Wall Street Journal Scientists have subjected Albert Einstein's famous theory of gravity to its toughest real-world test so ...Einstein Proved Right on Gravity - Again - Syndicated News Services
syndicatednewsservices.com/2013/.../einstein-proved-right-on-gravity-agai...3 hours ago – Einstein proved right on gravity – Again. Scientists have subjected Albert Einstein's famous theory of gravity to its toughest real-world test so ...Einstein Proved Right on Gravity---Again | Noticebrd | International ...
www.noticebrd.com/latest/einstein-proved-right-on-gravityagainScientists have subjected Albert Einstein's famous theory of gravity to its toughest real-world test so far—and it has prevailed....Theory of Einstein's Proved Right—Again
more in US »By GAUTAM NAIK
Scientists have subjected Albert Einstein's famous theory of gravity to its toughest real-world test so far—and it has prevailed.
The theory, which was published nearly a century ago, had already passed every test it was subjected to. But scientists have been trying to pin down precisely at what point Einstein's theory breaks down, and where an alternative explanation would have to be devised.
Einstein's framework for his theory of gravity, for example, is incompatible with quantum theory, which explains how nature works at an atomic and subatomic level.
Consider that for a black hole, Einstein's theory "predicts infinitely strong gravitational fields and density. That's nonsensical," said Paulo Freire, an astrophysicist at the Max Planck Institute for Radioastronomy in Germany and co-author of the study, which appears in the journal Science.
And so scientists are testing the general theory not because they think it is wrong but because they are certain it can't be the final explanation—just as Isaac Newton's notion of gravitational force was superseded by Einstein's.
Einstein's general theory of relativity states that objects with mass cause a curvature in space-time, which we perceive as gravity. Space-time, according to Einstein's theories of relativity, is a four-dimensional fabric woven together by space and time.
For example, a bowling ball causes a dent in a mattress, and that dent changes the otherwise straight motion of a nearby marble on the same mattress. Similarly, the mass of the sun distorts the space-time around it. A body with less mass, like the earth, travels along one path in that distorted space, which we call its orbit.
Dr. Freire and his colleagues put Einstein to the test in a cosmic laboratory 7,000 light years from earth, where two exotic stars are circling each other. One, known as a white dwarf, is the cooling remnant of a much lighter star. Its companion is a pulsar, which spins 25 times every second. Though the pulsar is just 12 miles across, it weighs twice as much as the sun.
More WSJ Science Coverage
- Scientists Find Hint of Dark Matter (4/3/2013)
- New Data Boost Case for Higgs Boson Find (3/14/2013)
- Possible New Planet Spotted Under Formation (2/28/2013)
- Good Thinking, Einstein (5/5/2011)
The gravity on the pulsar's surface is 300 billion times as great as the gravity on Earth. The conditions there approach the relentless, overwhelming power of a black hole, which swallows even light.
"We're testing Einstein's theory in a region where it has never been tested before," said Dr. Freire.
The pulsar and white dwarf pair emit gravitational waves and the binary star system gradually loses energy. As a result, the stars will move closer to each other and orbit faster. Einstein's theory suggests the stars' orbital periods—the time they take to go around each other—ought to shrink by about eight-millionths of a second per year.
Dr. Freire's and his colleagues used several telescopes to take precise measurements of the two-star system. Their results perfectly matched the Einstein-based prediction.
Though Einstein's framework remains intact so far, "the study is significant for the way observations by astronomers are helping to identify new, extreme cases" to test his general theory of gravity, said Dr. Wang.
Einstein's theory was first—and dramatically—confirmed during a solar eclipse within four years of its publication, making him an instant celebrity. When asked how he would have felt if he had been proven wrong, Einstein replied: "I would have felt sorry for the Lord. The theory is correct."
Write to Gautam Naik at gautam.naik@wsj.com
end quote from:
I'm wondering after reading this whether a space time continuum can actually exist outside of a Black hole gravitational field which holds our galaxy and every other galaxy together and keeps it from spinning off in all directions?
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Here Are the New Members of Donald Trump’s Administration So Far
- Trump and Musk unleash a new kind of chaos on Washington
- Crowdsourcing - Wikipedia
- The state of the Arctic: High temperatures, melting ice, fires and unprecedented emissions
- The AI Translated this about Drone Sightings in Europe from German to English for me
- reprint of: Friday, March 18, 2016 More regarding "As Drones Evolve"
- More regarding "As Drones Evolve"
- "There is nothing so good that no bad may come of it and nothing so bad that no good may come of it": Descartes
- The Future of Climate Action Is Trade Policy
- I tried to get a copy from France from French Wikipedia but it just took me back to English Wikipedia:
Thursday, April 25, 2013
Einstein right on Gravity Again
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment