-
- Irish Times - 1 hour agoSamsung victory over Apple in US court gives Obama a dilemma ... Korea's Samsung, Apple's bitter rival that was found in an earlier case to be ...
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. - Wikipedia, the free ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Samsung_Electronics_Co.,_Ltd.Jump to German courts – In the same time period and in similar cases of related legal ... The court found that Samsung had infringed Apple's patents.Judge slashes Apple's court win against Samsung by $450 million ...
arstechnica.com/.../judge-slashes-apples-court-win-against-sams...Mar 1, 2013 – Judge slashes Apple's court win against Samsung by $450 million ... after the whole case goes up on appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the ...Samsung Loses Apple Court Case | - Mobile Marketing Magazine
mobilemarketingmagazine.com › NewsSamsung has lost its court case in the US against Apple. The Korean company has been ordered to pay Apple $1.05bn (£665m) in damages. The ruling could ...Google Is Not a "Friend of the Court" in Samsung Case, Apple Says ...
allthingsd.com/.../apple-google-is-not-a-friend-of-the-court-in-s...May 9, 2013 – android_apple_shove In Apple's sprawling legal battle with Samsung, Google is hardly an impartial party. It's the author of the Android mobile ...Samsung victory over Apple in US court gives Obama a dilemma
US President Barack Obama at the White House in Washington
Over the next 60 days, US President Barack Obama faces a dilemma in a dispute pitting two of the world’s biggest companies against each other and carrying far-reaching implications about the ownership of intellectual property in the technology sector.Mr Obama could use his presidential powers to overturn a ruling by the International Trade Commission, a Washington agency, that on Tuesday banned Apple from selling certain iPhones and iPads in the US.Alternatively, he could follow the example of most of his predecessors in such cases and stand by the ITC ruling. This would favour South Korea’s Samsung, Apple’s bitter rival that was found in an earlier case to be copying the iPhone’s designs.“These are two electronics giants; he’s going to offend someone whichever way he goes,” says Susan Kohn Ross, a partner specialising in trade disputes and intellectual property at law firm Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp.Mr Obama’s quandary comes as his administration has put renewed focus on patent reform. The last US president to use his veto in an ITC case was Ronald Reagan. Bans ordered by the ITC are subject to a 60-day window in which they are reviewed by the president.If there is pressure on Mr Obama, it is greater on Apple, which until now had fared well in the US courts. Tuesday’s sudden reversal of last autumn’s preliminary ITC ruling, which had also cleared Apple of infringing Samsung’s patents, came as a surprise to many US observers.The ITC found that Apple’s AT&T versions of the iPhone 4 and iPad 2, along with some older devices no longer on sale, infringed on one Samsung patent and should be banned from import into the US.The devices caught by the import ban are the AT&T variants of the iPhone 4, 3GS and 3G, as well as the original iPad and iPad 2. – (The Financial Times )
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Because of fighting in Ukraine and Israel Bombing Iran I thought I should share this EMP I wrote in 2011
- reprint of: Drones very small to large
- most read articles from KYIV Post
- The 70s: Wikipedia
- Keri Russell pulls back the curtain on "The Diplomat" (season 2 filming now for Netflix)
- The ultra-lethal drones of the future | New York Post 2014 article
- "There is nothing so good that no bad may come of it and nothing so bad that no good may come of it": Descartes
- Jack Ryan from Prime (4 seasons)
- When I began to write "A Journey through Time"
- ‘Central Park Five’ members sue Trump for defamation after his debate comments on 1989 case
Wednesday, June 5, 2013
Samsung victory over Apple a Dilemma for Obama
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment