Wednesday, July 10, 2013

NASA rejection letter to woman in 1962

NASA Rejection Letter to Woman in 1962 Was Blunt: No Girls Allowed

Reddit via Imgur (click to enlarge)Reddit via Imgur (click to enlarge)A harsh 1962 rejection letter said to be from NASA to a woman yearning to become an astronaut has surfaced online this week, reminding everyone how much times have changed.

More on Shine: Disney's Sexist Rejection Letter: No Girls Need Apply

“Your offer to go on a space mission is commendable and we are very grateful,” wrote NASA public information director O.B. Lloyd Jr. in the four-sentence letter, which was reposted on Reddit July 8. “This is to advise that we have no existing program concerning women astronauts nor do we contemplate any such plan.”

The blunt rejection was sent to a University of Connecticut mailing address, written to a woman identified only as “Miss Kelly.”

More on Yahoo!: NASA Sends Encouraging Letter to 7-Year-Old Aspiring Astronaut

Though NASA spokesperson Bob Jacobs stated that it was difficult to confirm the letter’s authenticity, he said that Lloyd was indeed director of public services from 1961 to 1979. Also, Jacobs told Yahoo! Shine in an email, “Our initial research shows the wording in the response is consistent with the agency’s public stance on female astronauts in 1962.”

It also seemed similar to one sent that same year from NASA to Hillary Clinton, who recently revealed that she’d wanted to be an astronaut when she was young.

“So when I was about 13, I wrote to NASA and asked what I needed to do to try to be an astronaut,” she said during her remarks at a 2012 event celebrating Amelia Earhart. “And of course, there weren’t any women astronauts, and NASA wrote me back and said there would not be any women astronauts. And I was just crestfallen.”

Sally Ride in 1983. Photo: MCT via Getty ImagesSuch letters, Jacobs noted, were “a reflection of a time five decades ago when the requirements for astronauts were not easily met by women. The agency’s stance evolved with the times, however. Original Mercury astronaut Deke Slayton wrote in 1970 to future NASA astronaut Marsha Ivins, ‘The exact time when we would seriously consider women is indefinite, but I am sure it is inevitable.’”

Slayton was right, of course, but it took some time. Though a woman would be sent into space just 16 months after the letter to Miss Kelly—Valentina Tereshkova, of Russia—it would be another 21 years until the United States got with the program and sent the Sally Ride, now deceased, on her 1983 space mission with the Challenger STS-7.
Since that time, notable female astronauts have included Judith Resnik, who died in the 1986 Challenger disaster; Kathryn Sullivan and Kathryn Thornton, who walked in space during separate missions in the late ’80s; Mae Jemison, the first African American woman in space, in 1992; and Sunita Williams, who still holds the record for longest spaceflight by a woman for her 195-day mission in 2006.

In June of this year, NASA named a new group of eight astronauts, half of which were women—the highest percentage ever selected for a class. “So times have certainly changed over the past 51 years,” Jacobs said.

Still, the letter on Reddit, originally posted several months ago by user “bombino3” with the title "My friend's mom applied to be an astronaut," and reposted this week, had generated more than 1,200 comments by Tuesday afternoon. And many of them were decidedly snarky. “NO SMELLY GIRLS ALLOWED IN OUR SPACE TREEHOUSE” was the most popular quip, with others like “They distract the male astronauts with those skimpy, revealing space suits” and “Wow, NASA basically told her to get back in the kitchen” not far behind.

Not all NASA letters have been so harsh, of course. One from 1966 that’s on file at the agency, Jacobs told the Space Review recently, was quite encouraging to a young Michigan girl who expressed interest in becoming a veterinarian in space, and made no mention of gender.

“Your desire to be an astrovet is most interesting,” wrote public affairs official William O’Donnell. “However, at this time there is no requirement for such a specialty in the space program. We are enclosing the latest list of prerequisites for astronaut candidates in the hope that they will give you some guidance as to your selection of subjects to take up in school.” Nice, right?

Just last month, NASA sent another inspiring letter to a child (albeit a boy), garnering lots of positive attention on Reddit.

“I heard that you are sending two people into Mars and I would like to come, but I’m seven so I can’t,” 7-year-old Dexter Walters first wrote to NASA. “I would like to come in the future. What do I need to do to become an astronaut?”

The response, from the agency’s office of communications, told Walters, “NASA wants you to know that your thoughts and ideas to further space exploration are important, and we hope that you will continue to learn all you can about NASA's space programs, missions, and accomplishments.”

It went on to suggest useful websites with info on becoming an astronaut, and added, “Just think—in a few years, you could be one of the pioneers that may help lead the world's activities for better understanding of our earth and for exploring space.” A far cry, happily, from the way NASA seems to have handled Miss Kelly all those years ago.

Related:
Marriage Secrets of America's First Astronaut Wives: When Your Husband's Office Is Space
NASA's Astronaut Mom Opens Up Before Six-Month Stint In Space
end quote from:
http://shine.yahoo.com/healthy-living/nasa-rejection-letter-to-woman-in-1962-was-blunt--no-girls-allowed-181854889.html

I remember when women weren't allowed to do much of anything compared to what they can do now. I was 14 in 1962. It was a completely different world then. In some ways the plight of women and minorities were the same then. Many people were frustrated in many ways by trying to fit themselves into little boxes they weren't comfortable in. Many committed suicide directly or indirectly because they couldn't make their lives work then. It's not that life is better now than then necessarily, it is just different than it was then. That is the best way to put it. The good part is that more people can do more what they want to with their lives here in the U.S. at least. This is less true in other parts of the world, however.

The other thing I would like to say is that often more choices only creates more confusion for many people. For example, my father was valedictorian of his High School Class in 1934 and then wasn't
allowed to go to college by his father. So, when it was time for me to go to college in 1966 he wanted me to be free to "Be Anything" I wanted to be. However, mostly that I found just to be confusing more than anything else. I've only known a couple of people that knew right away what they wanted to be and then were also happy to be that the rest of their lives. One of these people was my cousin who knew at 12 he wanted to be a lawyer and still hasn't retired even though he is now over 70 years old. So, I think he is very lucky to know and to do what he wanted to from age 12 on to the present.

No comments: