Monday, August 29, 2016

United States to Give Up Its Control of the Internet

  1. The real problem of this of course is if it gives up it's control of the Internet, the Internet is no longer protected in any way, shape or form which also might mean that the Internet is simply too dangerous now for ANYONE to use anywhere. This is one thing it actually might mean.

  1.  

    Ted Cruz proposes bill to keep U.S. from giving up...

    www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/8/cruz-proposes...
    Jun 07, 2016 · ... Cruz would prohibit the U.S. government from relinquishing ... keep U.S. from giving up internet ... Protecting Internet Freedom Act, “would ...
  2. begin quote from:

  1. United States to Give Up Its Control of the ...

    www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/congress/item/17873-...
    United States to Give Up Its Control of the Internet Written ... We thank the U.S. government for its ... morphing from “protecting” intellectual property to ... 
    Tuesday, 18 March 2014

    United States to Give Up Its Control of the Internet

    Written by 
    Last Friday the Department of Commerce announced that in October 2015 it will relinquish all remaining control over the “root” of the Internet to an obscure but vital private non-profit organization. That group, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), promises to create a new structure that will keep the Internet private, safe, and robust. Many freedom-loving people and organizations are concerned that ICANN will now fall under the governance of the UN and the totalitarian regimes that make up the bulk of its membership.
    From the start of the Internet, informally considered to be in 1994, a computer genius named Jon Postel managed the Internet from his office in California, under the name Internet Assigned Names Authority (IANA). When Postel died suddenly in 1998 at age 55, his responsibilities were transferred to ICANN under the control of the Department of Commerce (DoC). Although the relationship between the DoC was constitutionally questionable, violating various constitutional boundaries and safeguards (according to Michael Froomkin, a University of Miami Law School professor), the DoC largely kept its hands off the new entity, allowing it to grow and change and respond to the explosion of the Internet over the next 15 years.

No comments: