After falling for five consecutive years, the number of violent crimes across the United States rose by 1.2% in 2012. Based on data published by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
the increase was even greater in some of America’s largest cities. In
2012, for the third year in a row, Flint, Michigan had the highest violent crime rate in the country.
According to the FBI,
violent crime includes murder, nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery
and aggravated assault. In some cases, the cities with the highest
violent crime rate, including Flint and Oakland,
had high rates in all four categories. However, most of the most
violent cities tend to do very poorly only in a few categories.
Yahoo! Homes is publishing the five most dangerous cities, based on the FBI Uniform Crime Report via 24/7 Wall St. To see the rest of the top 10 most dangerous cities in America, visit 24/7 Wall St. online:
Crime in these cities is typically not limited to just violent crime. Three cities — Birmingham, St. Louis and Oakland — were among the 10 worst cities in the nation for both violent crime and property crime.
In some of the most dangerous cities, specific types of property crime
were especially common. Flint and Cleveland had among the highest
burglary rates, while Oakland, Detroit and St. Louis had among the
highest rates of vehicle theft.
The economies of many of the most
dangerous cities have been in bad shape for years, in some cases long
before the Great Recession. The populations of many of the most
dangerous cities declined, leaving behind highly impoverished urban
centers. The loss of economic diversity, explained John Roman, senior fellow at the Urban institute, only serves to exacerbate crime in cities like Detroit, Flint, Cleveland and St. Louis.
In fact, all the 10 most dangerous cities had poverty rates above the national rate of 15.9% in 2011. In half of these cities, more than 30% of the population lived in poverty. Detroit and Flint
had poverty rates of more than 40%. “It is very clear that poverty in
particular is associated with higher crime rates,” explained Roman.
However, the relationship between the two is less certain. It is
“very difficult to say whether crime makes places poorer, or poverty
causes more crime,” Roman noted.
In many of the nation’s most dangerous cities, unemployment is also extremely high. Seven of the 10 cities with the highest levels of violent crime had unemployment
rates above 10% in 2012, much higher than the national unemployment
rate of 8.1% that year. In two cities, Detroit and Stockton, the
unemployment rate was more than 18% last year.
Low educational attainment also goes hand-in-hand with high crime
rates. In all of the 10 most dangerous cities, the percentage of adults
with a high school diploma was below the 86% national average. In five
of these metro areas, the percentage of adults with a diploma was below
80%.
On its website, the FBI
instructs readers to avoid comparing city violence because rankings
tend to be simplistic and ignore factors that influence crime, as well
as the different ways crimes are measured and reported. For this reason,
Roman cautioned against directly comparing cities based on their
individual crime rates. However, because the cities with the highest and
lowest violent crime rates have remained consistent for many years, he
believes comparing city ranks was useful.
Based on the FBI’s
Preliminary Annual Uniform Crime Report, 24/7 Wall St. identified the
10 U.S. cities with populations of 100,000 or more with the highest
rates of violent crime per 100,000 residents. Using estimated
populations and crime incidents from the FBI, which measures incidents
of eight types of violent and nonviolent crime for 2012, 24/7 Wall St.
calculated the incidence of the four types of violent crime per 100,000
persons for that year: murder, forcible rape, robbery and aggravated
assault. In addition to crime data, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed median income and poverty rates
for these cities from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community
Survey for 2011, the most recent available year. We also included
average 2012 unemployment rates for these cities from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
5. Memphis, Tenn.
> Violent crimes per 100,000: 1,750.0
> Population: 657,436
> 2012 murders: 133
> Poverty rate: 27.2%
> Percentage of adults with high school degree: 83.4%
> Violent crimes per 100,000: 1,750.0
> Population: 657,436
> 2012 murders: 133
> Poverty rate: 27.2%
> Percentage of adults with high school degree: 83.4%
Memphis had the third highest
rate of aggravated assault in 2012, with 1,151.9 cases per 100,000
residents. This was up from the 1,032.3 cases per 100,000 in 2011. The
city’s murder rate of 20.2 per 100,000 people and robbery rate
of 514.4 per 100,000 people were also up from 2011. The high levels of
crime has people in the Memphis area feeling uneasy. According to a
recent Gallup survey, roughly 43% of Memphis area residents reported
feeling unsafe walking at night, the highest percentage of all the 50
largest metropolitan areas in the country and significantly higher than
the 28% across the United States.
4. St. Louis, Mo.
> Violent crimes per 100,000: 1,776.5
> Population: 318,667
> 2012 murders: 113
> Poverty rate: 27.0%
> Percentage of adults with high school degree: 83.9%
> Violent crimes per 100,000: 1,776.5
> Population: 318,667
> 2012 murders: 113
> Poverty rate: 27.0%
> Percentage of adults with high school degree: 83.9%
There were 1,120.6 aggravated assaults per 100,000 people in St. Louis
in 2012, higher than all but three other cities. Moreover, the murder
rate of 35.5 cases per 100,000 was the fifth highest of all cities.
Although St. Louis’s violent crime
was still among the highest in the country, it has improved. There were
80 less violent crimes per 100,000 people in 2012 compared to 2011 —
the best improvement of any city on this list, with the drop mostly
attributable to 106 less robberies per 100,000 people in 2012 compared
to the previous year. Law enforcement officials attributed some of the
drop to an increased police presence in high-crime neighborhoods.
3. Oakland, Calif.> Violent crimes per 100,000: 1,993.1
> Population: 399,487
> 2012 murders: 126
> Poverty rate: 21.0%
> Percentage of adults with high school degree: 79.9%
There were 1,085.9 robberies per 100,000 residents in Oakland
in 2012, higher than any other city. This was also significantly higher
than the 851.2 robberies per 100,000 just a year earlier. The rates of
murder and aggravated assaults also increased in 2012 compared to 2011.
Violent crime was not the only issue in Oakland, either — there were
6,594 property crimes per 100,000 residents in 2012, more than all but
eight other cities, and up from 5,287.9 in 2011. Crime in the city has
increased ever since the city’s police department went through a round
of layoffs in 2010 due to $30.5 million deficit.
2. Detroit, Mich.
> Violent crimes per 100,000: 2,122.6
> Population: 707,096
> 2012 murders: 386
> Poverty rate: 40.9%
> Percentage of adults with high school degree: 77.4%
> Violent crimes per 100,000: 2,122.6
> Population: 707,096
> 2012 murders: 386
> Poverty rate: 40.9%
> Percentage of adults with high school degree: 77.4%
Detroit’s murder rate of 54.2 per
100,000 residents was the second highest in the country last year. The
homicide rate in Detroit, which included 386 criminal murders and an
additional 25 justifiable homicides, reached the highest level in nearly
40 years. In addition, the city’s aggravated assault rate of 1,320.8
cases per 100,000 people was also the second highest in the United
States, although this was an improvement from the 1,333.6 cases per
100,000 residents in 2011. Detroit has struggled economically in recent
years. The city’s 2012 unemployment rate
was a whopping 18.6%, much higher than the 8.1% across the nation last
year. The median household income of $25,193 was less than half the
national median for 2011.
1. Flint, Mich.> Violent crimes per 100,000: 2,729.5
> Population: 101,632
> 2012 murders: 63
> Poverty rate: 40.6%
> Percentage of adults with high school degree: 82.9%
With a staggering 2,729.5 violent crimes per 100,000 residents, no city had a higher violent crime rate than Flint.
The city of just 101,632 people had 63 total murders and 1,930
aggravated assaults, both the highest relative to the city’s population.
Flint also had nationwide highs in burglary rates and arson per 100,000
people. The sheriff of Genesee County, where Flint is located, proposed
a plan to create a violent crime mobile response unit that would cost $3 million. However, Governor Rick Snyder
rejected the plan because he believed resources would be better
“integrated into the ongoing efforts to make Flint safer.” Like Detroit,
Flint has suffered economically in recent years. The median household
income was just $23,380 in 2011, the second-lowest of all 555 cities
measured by the U.S. Census Bureau.
To see the rest of the 10 most dangerous cities, visit 24/7 Wall St. online.end quote from:
http://homes.yahoo.com/news/the-most-dangerous-cities-in-america--2013-201732579.html
I would like to tell you a true story about a boy from Oakland that I counseled in San Jose, California. The boys I counseled had been convicted of at least 7 felonies without using a gun. However, a knife or blunt instrument or even ones fist could have been a part of these 7 felonies. But, because a gun wasn't used in the commission of their crimes they had not been sent to the California Youth Authority which is the 12 to 17 age version of prison mostly for violent offenders.
The then 15 year old boy from Oakland who was African American felt threatened because an Aryan Nation 17 year old white boy was being transferred into this halfway house facility where I was a counselor. So, when this happened the Aryan nation white boy made it known to the black boy that he intended to kill him. The black boy made a phone call to get his cousin to come kill the Aryan Nation boy. So as counselors we had to some way avoid someone getting murdered in this situation. For us, as counselors the easiest way to handle this was to move the new Aryan Nation white boy to another sister facility to avoid him getting shot by the Oakland boy's cousin. This solved problem. So, when the cousin arrived to shoot the white boy we had already moved him to another facility.
I later asked the African American boy from Oakland if he would be safer in this facility or at home in Oakland? He told me he was glad to be here in the facility because he would be killed if we sent him back to Oakland.
I'm trying to demonstrate here just how dangerous places like Oakland, California and places like Birmingham and Saint Louis actually are. I also have experience with Saint Louis with someone trying to run my rental car off the road to kill or mug us while I as there trying to go to a funeral for my father in law who wanted to be buried there next to his father and mother. So, if you are from another country or even from this country just realize when they say some places are dangerous, if you go there really be on your toes watching out for potential problems.
No comments:
Post a Comment