Tuesday, August 18, 2015

Asia's 'infrastructure gap' threatens to hamper growth



Asia's 'infrastructure gap' threatens to hamper growth


Associated Press

In this Tuesday, Aug. 11, 2015 photo, a train of the Manila Metro Rail Transit System travels in between Epifanio de los Santos Avenue (EDSA) during rush hour traffic in the financial district of Makati, south of Manila, Philippines. Manila and other cities are choked with construction sites for office and apartment towers. But spending on roads, railways and other unglamorous but essential infrastructure collapsed after the 1997 financial crisis and has yet to recover. (AP Photo/Aaron Favila)
.
View gallery

MANILA, Philippines (AP) — Looking out at bumper-to-bumper Monday morning traffic crawling along the Philippine capital's main avenue, taxi driver Ranilo Banez shook his head in frustration.
Congestion has gotten so bad as the economy grew, he said, that a 10-kilometer (six-mile) trip that once took 30 minutes can stretch to two hours.
"We lose so much," said Banez, 64. "We waste a lot of gasoline and time."
The Philippines is far from alone. The outpouring of support for a Chinese-led bank to finance infrastructure highlights a gap in Asia's success story: From power-starved India to Thailand's overburdened railways, developing economies face a shortage of basic facilities so severe that it threatens to hold back growth and living standards.
Manila and other cities are choked with construction sites for office and apartment towers. But spending on roads, railways and other unglamorous but essential infrastructure collapsed after the 1997 financial crisis and has yet to recover.
"The catch-up they need to do is still considerable," said Ramesh Subramaniam, deputy director general of the ADB's Southeast Asia department.
If spending fails to pick up, "then this could possibly have an impact on future growth," he said. "Certainly it is going to reduce the competitiveness of the countries in the region."
That gap has given Beijing a chance to assert its ambition to be a regional leader and fueled a diplomatic alms race.
On top of its planned infrastructure bank, which 57 countries want to join, the government of President Xi Jinping has launched initiatives to improve road, rail and sea links.
Japan joined Washington in staying away from the Chinese bank. Instead, Tokyo responded in June by announcing its own credit package of $110 billion for the region.
The Asian Development Bank has estimated developing Asian economies need to invest $8 trillion in the decade through 2020 or some 80 times the planned $100 billion capital of Beijing's bank.
India is set to pass China this year as the world's fastest-growing big economy. To keep that up, its government says, the nation of 1.2 billion people needs to spend $1 trillion on infrastructure in the five years through 2017.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi called in May for India to speed up building "all projects that will ensure a modern infrastructure backbone."
India's most ambitious initiative is the $100 billion Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor Project. It calls for creating seven industrial cities, high-speed railways, six airports and three sea ports.
Nationwide, the government says India needs 450 new coal-fired power plants. It also plans a $10.2 billion high-speed train to link Mumbai, the financial capital, with Ahmedabad, an industrial city to the north.
In Vietnam, the ruling Communist Party in June approved a proposal for a $15.8 billion second airport for its business capital, Ho Chi Minh City.
To meet power demand that rises by 10 percent a year, state media say Vietnam needs to spend $50 billion in the decade through 2020 and another $75 billion over the next decade. They put Vietnam's spending needs for highways at $22.5 billion in 2015-20.
Thailand has a 3 trillion baht ($92 billion) building plan for 2015-22 that includes high-speed train routes that eventually will stretch from China in the north through Malaysia in the south to Singapore. It calls for expanding seaports and Bangkok's commuter trains.
In the Philippines, President Benigno Aquino III in May approved $1.4 billion in spending for commuter rail in Manila and other projects. That brought the total for infrastructure investment to $31.8 billion since Aquino took office in 2010.
Bjorn Pardo, founder and CEO of Xend, a delivery company in the Philippines with 250 employees, said it copes with congestion by using custom-outfitted motorcycles instead of trucks.
"The traffic situation will not get significantly better anytime soon," said Pardo in an email.
The Philippines ranks 95th out of 144 countries on a World Economic Forum survey of infrastructure quality. Its 2011-16 development plan promises to reduce the number of homes without access to power and running water and build ports, railways, power plants and cargo terminals.
"Our priority will be energy," said Benjamin Diokno, an economist at the University of the Philippines and former Cabinet secretary. "The urban rail system is also pressing. The railway system from north to south is pressing. Everything is pressing."
The Asian Development Bank says if the required facilities are built, the region's people could get an extra $4.5 trillion in income in the decade through 2020 and another $8.5 trillion after that.
Many have yet to work out how to pay for those projects.
Before the 1997 crisis, public works spending in many developing Asian economies was equal to 6 to 8 percent of annual economic output.
Post-crisis, that tumbled to as little as 2 percent. It dipped below 1 percent in the Philippines in 2010. Today, it is below 3 percent in Indonesia, Pakistan and other economies — less than half the level the ADB says is needed to support growth at current levels.
In the Indonesian capital, Jakarta, courier Yusuf Abdillah complained he loses two hours a day in traffic jams that can stretch up to eight kilometers (five miles).
"I'm fed up," said Abdillah, 28. "The government is being irresponsible."
Many governments want to draw in money from pension funds, insurance companies and other private investors.
The Philippines hopes encouraging private investment will help boost infrastructure spending from 3.4 percent of gross domestic product this year to 5 percent next year, according to Economic Planning Secretary Arsenio Balisacan.
But many projects have yet to be structured as profit-oriented ventures to repay investors. And investors are wary of political interference and potential delays over environmental and other concerns.
China has pledged to supply most of the initial $50 billion in capital for its Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.
In June, governments including Britain, New Zealand, France, Australia and South Korea signed an agreement on the bank's basic principles.
Still, the ADB's Subramaniam said the region's total spending is likely to be less than half the amount required.
"The continuing unmet needs clearly indicate we need more resources and different ways of structuring projects," he said.
___
McDonald reported from Beijing. AP Writers Nirmala George in New Delhi, Tran Van Minh in Hanoi, Vietnam, Thanyarat Doksone in Bangkok and Niniek Karmini in Jakarta, Indonesia contributed.
___
This story has been corrected to show that Ramesh Subramaniam is deputy director general, not director general, of the ADB's Southeast Asia department.

View Comments (108)
end quote from:
http://news.yahoo.com/asias-infrastructure-gap-threatens-hamper-growth-061238801.html
I cannot speak for now but, for example, out in the country in Nepal and India in 1985 often there would be nothing resembling a gas station in the U.S. or Europe at that time. Instead there would be a place with 50 gallon drums filled with gasoline or diesel with hand pumps on top of them. So, I guess if they didn't have measuring devices built into the hand pump you would have to buy 5 to 10 gallons at a time put into plastic containers and then put into your vehicle large or small. Also, roads were only one lane outside of cities almost always. So, the biggest vehicle from the opposite direction pushed everyone else coming towards them off the pavement onto the dirt at the side of the road. Sometimes motorcycles were driven off into the forest to miss trucks and buses too. So, I was driving some from Kathmandu to the Indian border but realized it wasn't what I was used to. Especially when our Nepali driver told me about a busload of Tibetan Monks and Lamas that went off a cliff nearby in a bus and everyone died near the river on the way between Kathmandu, Nepal and the Indian border. 

So, infrastructure has always been a problem in Asia. However, one good thing is that Cell phones only need microwave towers every so often and not thousands of miles of copper or aluminum wires on tops of poles. Also, solar arrays used locally don't need thousands of miles of copper and aluminum wires strung on poles or metal towers either. So, as the nature of infrastructure changes so do areas needs change. But, roads everywhere have always been very expensive to build and to maintain. 

For example, the U.S. is having a really terrible problem with roads and bridges right now, because they just cost too much to replace effectively. The costs have risen from the 1930s by about a factor between 10 and 100 which makes it relatively impossible to maintain infrastructure like roads and bridges nationwide unless you hired cheap labor from China or India or Viet Nam to do this and even then the Unions who usually do this would scream. So, it is a no win situation financially for the U.S. to maintain it's infrastructure too.

Eventually though, the bridges and roads will become just so unsafe that everyone will have to own an off road 4 wheel drive or fly a helicopter or take the train or subway to work. This is the reality we face here in the U.S.  And in Asia this problem is much worse. After all the train and subway accidents lately I wouldn't be very enthusiastic about taking trains and subways by the way if this were me.

In December of 1985 on our drive from Kathmandu, Nepal to India we came across a highway building crew but it was unlike anything I have seen before or since it included men sitting by the side of the road chipping rocks with hammers without eye protection, Rolling pins to flatten asphalt onto the road and Elephants and Camels to pull road building equipment to finish the roads better. So, this was pretty amazing then in 1985 and likely things are much different there now. However, if this was true between Nepal and INdia in the mountains then this also could be true then in other areas (or now) in the more remote parts of Asia. So, you get a better idea of what has been going on there for some time now since 1985.

Another thing my friend saw by I did not see personally is on a 20,000 foot pass between Nepal and Tibet on the way to Lhasa, Tibet my friend saw a whole bus load of dead people. They were freeze dried there and no one was coming for them because it was too dangerous to help them or recover their bodies then. I'm sure eventually when the weather got better someone did something but likely that would be months later. All these things were happening in 1985 and 1986 in the Himalayas then.

This was why I decided not to take my family by bus to Lhasa then. You were not allowed to fly into Lhasa then. However, as a caveat I had a friend in her 70s from church who landed there and died within 15 minutes from the 12,000 feet altitude there. So, if you are going try to spend some time in a place like Santa Fe, Flagstaff or Colorado Springs (all over 7000 feet in elevation) for a week to a month before you go so you don't just die when you get off the plane in Lhasa if that's possible.

Or go to the top of a 12,000 feet place like a mountain peak and see how you do at that altitude before you fly into Lhasa for a week.

for example, the last time I was in Colorado (within the last 5 years with my son) we both got a bad headache in Santa Fe, New Mexico because it is over 7000 feet in altitude there. We finally left and drove to Winslow where there is this really neat artsy train Station hotel there. You can even take the train to Winslow and stay there while traveling by train. But, be sure to get a reservation first. We stayed at Winslow because it is under 5000 feet elevation and our headaches went away. My son had lived at 5000 feet in Colorado but for some reason both of us got headache there this time in Santa Fe.

 
 

No comments: