One likely scenario for human survival

People who move away from destruction survive. Those who don't don't survive.

This likely will be how it goes. People over 30 to 40 might be more likely to die in extreme weather events worldwide. People younger than 30 might be more likely to survive especially if they are 15 to 30 years old and mobile in mind and body.

So, this likely will be what we will watch the rest of this century and beyond. Those who can move so they aren't washed away or blown away, or flooded away or drought ed away or starved to death will be the ones who survive into the next century and beyond. (in regard to extreme earthquake and weather events worldwide).

So, I'm thinking nations are going to need to prepare for this outcome worldwide as the weather gets nastier and nastier.

As an intuitive looking into the future, water and winds over 100 mph are the most destructive. Even though droughts are more destructive to any area in regard to all the plant and animal and human life there.

So, in the short run surviving water and winds or blizzard might be the thing. However, in the long run droughts tend to be much more destructive to any area.

Whole civilizations have ended over droughts in their areas in history when they lasted too long.

Note: If 4,400 people are dying of air pollution in China every day is this a weather event? Is this a people caused event? Can people get away from the pollution if they choose?

The answer has to be "Yes" for those who want to stay alive and not die from respiratory problems.

Another point: "People during the late 1800s were dying from the smog in London. In the 1950s in summers the high sulphur leaded fuels burned in California before catalytic converters on cars and trucks cause me to 'Cry' as a child in Glendale if I went outside to play. (The sulphur in the smoke in the air caused a person to cry and if they started they couldn't stop their eyes from watering while outside during the summers. This was made worse if I went to a pool with clorine in the pool. Then every breath felt like I was being stabbed with a knife as I tried to ride my bike home from Verdugo Olympic sized Swimming pool.

So, what I'm saying here is air pollution used to be really bad in London where people were dying and people while I was growing up died from asthma in Los Angeles all the time in the 1950s if they didn't leave then too.

However, now there are catalytic converters required on all gasoline reciprocating engines in cars and trucks in California. The air looks clear now and not where you only could see a city block or less in the 1950s like when I grew up during the summer time.

So, things in China are likely to change when enough people are dying every single day. What would that amount be?

Possibly 10,000 a day or over 3 million people a year dying. If not then likely the amount dying will simply increase until something else happens.