Desperate for planes, military turns to the 'boneyard'
Story highlights
- Military officials are concerned about safety and accidents
- The boneyard is a base in Arizona where old warplanes go to die
(CNN)It's something akin to raising the dead.
A
troubling shortage of flyable combat aircraft -- one military official
recently called the air fleet the "smallest, oldest and least ready" in
history -- is forcing the military to go to its "boneyard."
The
Marine Corps announced last month it was taking the extreme step of
resurrecting 23 F/A-18 Hornets to meet fleet requirements until the new
-- and much-delayed -- F-35 fighter is eventually delivered.
"We
are very focused on our current readiness, and at the moment, we don't
have enough Hornets for combat, flight instruction and day-to-day
training," Sarah Burns, a spokesman for the U.S. Marine Corps, told CNN.
She
explained that the out-of-service, aging aircraft are housed at the
309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Center -- a desert base in
Arizona known as "the boneyard" -- with the "intent to store, maintain,
and upgrade them for today's use."
The
military regularly sends "mothball" or extra aircraft to the "boneyard"
for long-term storage, rather than destroying the planes. However, Lt.
Gen. Jon M. Davis, deputy commandant for aviation for the U.S. Marine
Corps, noted that while bringing back the planes does provide additional
inventory, they are still "old birds" and not as reliable as they once
were.
And if planes aren't in the boneyard already, others are getting close.
The
delayed arrival of new aircraft, like the fifth-generation F-35, also
has forced the military to rely heavily on planes nearing the end of
their lifespan.
According
to Maj. Gen. Scott West, the director of current operations for the Air
Force, airmen are flying some aircraft and bombers, like the B-52
Stratofortress, that are more than 50 years old.
Military brass warn Congress there's a problem
As
it presses aircraft back into service, the military is having to lean
heavily on a smaller and aging air fleet -- a trend that has leaders
across all four armed service branches concerned about combat
performance and pilot safety.
Appearing
before a House Armed Services subcommittee last week, leaders from the
Air Force, Navy, Army and Marines warned lawmakers that fiscal
constraints, coupled with the critical focus on overseas operations,
have seriously degraded training and readiness efforts.
"Twenty-five
years of continuous combat operations ... coupled with budget
instability and lower-than-planned funding levels, have contributed to
one of the smallest, oldest and least ready forces across the
full-spectrum of operations in our history," said Maj. Gen. Scott West,
director of current operations, Headquarters for the U.S. Air Force.
While
each armed service branch has scrambled to find ways to fulfill its
combat responsibilities in the short-term, military leaders said delays
in the production of next-generation aircraft and shrinking budgets have
put a strain on the condition of the current fleet, as well as the
servicemen and women who fly and maintain them.
"Fiscal
constraints continue to force difficult trades in capacity and
readiness for long-term capability improvements," said Rear Adm. Michael
Manazir, the deputy chief of naval operations for warfare systems.
The
military commanders cautioned that they simply do not have enough
aircraft ready for flight to keep up with the current pace of deployment
and to safely train aircrews here at home.
"Today,
there are not enough flyable aircraft -- our 'ready bench' -- if our
nation were subjected to a crisis," Davis said. "Today, I could fly 43%
(443 of the 1,040) of the aircraft I should have on my flight lines."
A
lack of spare parts and maintenance personnel trained to repair damaged
aircraft are two of the main factors contributing to the lack of
operational aircraft, according to military brass.
Describing
military aviation as a "fragile ecosystem," Davis emphasized the
importance of keeping all requisite aspects of that system nourished to
keep the entire network healthy.
"We
are balancing the need to have our current fleet as ready and modern as
possible, to train our pilots and maintainers, and to out match any
current foe on the battlefield," he said. "If any get out of balance for
long, the whole system can begin to fray and collapse."
The
need to improve readiness and training has been further amplified by
the shrinking technology advantage that the U.S. holds over potential
adversaries like China and Russia, according to Manazir.
"Provocations
with state and non-state actors continue to cause instability in almost
every region of the world," he told the subcommittee. "We continue to
face challenges associated with balancing readiness for today and
modernization for tomorrow's fight. More of our force is being demanded,
deployed longer than planned. Intended replacements are not keeping
pace with attrition."
With that in
mind, the Pentagon has fought to extend the life of several aircraft,
including the A-10 Thunderbolt, despite calls from Congress to eliminate
the program in favor of allocating funding to other initiatives.
But
the lack of a clear replacement for the A-10, which specializes in
performing close air support missions, has forced Congress to continue
the use of the old warbird that first flew in 1975.
Fears about pilot safety
All
four military leaders also repeatedly emphasized that the current lack
of flyable aircraft could pose a significant risk to pilot safety.
Despite
no significant rise in serious mishaps or accidents resulting from any
gaps in maintenance and lack of training, the four services noted that
the potential for such looms in the near future.
With
fewer planes available, Davis said Marine aviators are receiving
significantly less flight time. In the past, Marine pilots would receive
1,000 to 1,500 hours but today's aviators only have between 500 and 600
hours.
"I worry about my young
aviators that aren't getting the number of hours they need to," Davis
said. "As a young guy, I had a couple of close calls. I do not know how I
would do having the amount of flight time that my youngsters get."
There
has been an uptick in recent minor aircraft incidents resulting in
billions of dollars in damage and, in some cases, loss of life, the
military brass told Congress.
Many
of the incidents are still under investigation to determine whether
they were caused by human error or an aircraft malfunction, but both
lawmakers and military officials agreed that the limited training of
pilots raises concern about the potential for future incidents.
"While
it may not show itself directly today in the rate of mishaps, I do
believe it exhibits itself in additional risk," said Rep. Robert
Wittman, R-Va., the subcommittee chairman.
"There's
a common theme here: We're pushing harder. We have fewer resources. We
have fewer of the skilled people in the necessary positions to do all
the things that we need to do to make sure that we are not just
rebuilding that readiness but maintaining the current level of
readiness," he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment