Note: I'm not trying to be offensive in this article I'm just trying to be logical, reasonable and intuitive.
If more Superstorms are coming to the U.S. we might be better off with a President like Obama or Clinton (either one) than a Romney or a Bush because Obama and the Clintons advocate wind power and solar power, (which reduces greenhouse gases which likely help cause superstorms in the first place), and because with Obama or either of the Clintons it is more likely that FEMA and the Government might get involved in building the $10 Billion breakwater to stop more storms from hitting NYC and Long Island and other breakwaters to protect the Northeast and other areas from Coastal erosion like is done in the Netherlands and Japan around Tokyo. The other reason we might be better off with a President like Obama or the Clintons is that less people would tend to die as more Superstorms hit because of Government projects like Breakwaters and because we would still have a FEMA which we would not under Romney.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- A Tragic Loss | Tesla Motors
- These Are The Possible Future Leaders Of Britain
- It looks like I wrote this in 2002 which is the year after 9-11
- Transhumanism from Wikipedia
- Cancer rates 1900 to 2000 and beyond
- Ray Kurzweil created the idea of the Singularity in regard to Artificial intelligence. He believes it will come by 2050
- How to Survive a Potential Recession
- Climate change, new construction mean more ruinous fires
- 'First to sue': Opposing Trump's desire to end birthright citizenship is personal for this AG
- doctor visits due to flu reach highest level in 30 years
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment