Note: I'm not trying to be offensive in this article I'm just trying to be logical, reasonable and intuitive.
If more Superstorms are coming to the U.S. we might be better off with a President like Obama or Clinton (either one) than a Romney or a Bush because Obama and the Clintons advocate wind power and solar power, (which reduces greenhouse gases which likely help cause superstorms in the first place), and because with Obama or either of the Clintons it is more likely that FEMA and the Government might get involved in building the $10 Billion breakwater to stop more storms from hitting NYC and Long Island and other breakwaters to protect the Northeast and other areas from Coastal erosion like is done in the Netherlands and Japan around Tokyo. The other reason we might be better off with a President like Obama or the Clintons is that less people would tend to die as more Superstorms hit because of Government projects like Breakwaters and because we would still have a FEMA which we would not under Romney.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- 158,008 visits to intuitivefred888
- This is what the code looks like displayed on a page
- Went up into the snow today on Mt. Shasta
- Fulll Article: Iran war's shock waves threaten England's farms 6,000 miles away
- The reliant robin 3 wheeled CAR?
- California bear-suit luxury car scam ends in insurance fraud sentences for 3
- Why scientists are nervous about fungi: Full Article
- The problem with Social Media might be different than you think?
- Full Article: Desperate for fuel, US allies in Asia are turning to its adversaries instead
- ABC News: Historians sue over Trump's attempt to ignore Presidential Records Act
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment