Note: I'm not trying to be offensive in this article I'm just trying to be logical, reasonable and intuitive.
If more Superstorms are coming to the U.S. we might be better off with a President like Obama or Clinton (either one) than a Romney or a Bush because Obama and the Clintons advocate wind power and solar power, (which reduces greenhouse gases which likely help cause superstorms in the first place), and because with Obama or either of the Clintons it is more likely that FEMA and the Government might get involved in building the $10 Billion breakwater to stop more storms from hitting NYC and Long Island and other breakwaters to protect the Northeast and other areas from Coastal erosion like is done in the Netherlands and Japan around Tokyo. The other reason we might be better off with a President like Obama or the Clintons is that less people would tend to die as more Superstorms hit because of Government projects like Breakwaters and because we would still have a FEMA which we would not under Romney.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Here's how much ACA premiums would have risen this year without tax subsidies:
- Trump to make announcement with Hegseth on shipbuilding from Mar-a-Lago
- How the global food system is impacting obesity and climate change: Study
- gold has surged 70% since the Start of the Year
- quote from Wikipedia: Mark Carney
- As storms inundated Washington state, federal grants for flood mitigation work sat on hold
- Deputy AG says removing photos from Epstein files has 'nothing to do' with Trump(Sure thing) (ha ha)
- reprint of: My Path to Enlightenment from 2011
- is the storm hitting California a pineapple express?
- DOJ sues Illinois' governor over laws protecting immigrants at courthouses and hospitals
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment