Note: I'm not trying to be offensive in this article I'm just trying to be logical, reasonable and intuitive.
If more Superstorms are coming to the U.S. we might be better off with a President like Obama or Clinton (either one) than a Romney or a Bush because Obama and the Clintons advocate wind power and solar power, (which reduces greenhouse gases which likely help cause superstorms in the first place), and because with Obama or either of the Clintons it is more likely that FEMA and the Government might get involved in building the $10 Billion breakwater to stop more storms from hitting NYC and Long Island and other breakwaters to protect the Northeast and other areas from Coastal erosion like is done in the Netherlands and Japan around Tokyo. The other reason we might be better off with a President like Obama or the Clintons is that less people would tend to die as more Superstorms hit because of Government projects like Breakwaters and because we would still have a FEMA which we would not under Romney.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Here Are the New Members of Donald Trump’s Administration So Far
- Trump and Musk unleash a new kind of chaos on Washington
- She Dances for the Buddha
- Crowdsourcing - Wikipedia
- Greenland's leader says "we are not for sale" after Trump suggests U.S. takeover
- The AI Translated this about Drone Sightings in Europe from German to English for me
- The state of the Arctic: High temperatures, melting ice, fires and unprecedented emissions
- Thousands of Jews have left Israel since the October 7 attacks
- Philosophic Inquiry is nothing more than asking questions and looking for real (Not imagined) answers
- "There is nothing so good that no bad may come of it and nothing so bad that no good may come of it": Descartes
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment