Judge: Law won't protect unmarried victims in rape
– 14 hrs ago
LOS ANGELES (AP) — A California appeals court overturned the rape conviction of a man who authorities say pretended to be a sleeping woman's boyfriend before initiating intercourse, ruling that an arcane law from 1872 doesn't protect unmarried women in such cases.
A panel of judges reversed the trial court's conviction of Julio Morales and remanded it for retrial, in a decision posted Wednesday from the Los Angeles-based court.
Morales had been sentenced to three years in state prison. He was
accused of entering a woman's bedroom late one night after her boyfriend
had gone home and initiating sexual intercourse while she was asleep,
after a night of drinking.The victim said her boyfriend was in the room when she fell asleep, and they'd decided against having sex that night because he didn't have a condom and he had to be somewhere early the next day.
Morales pretended to be her
boyfriend in the darkened room, and it wasn't until a ray of light from
outside the room flashed across his face that she realized he wasn't her
boyfriend, according to prosecutors.
"Has the man committed rape?
Because of historical anomalies in the law and the statutory definition
of rape, the answer is no, even though, if the woman had been married
and the man had impersonated her husband, the answer would be yes," Judge Thomas L. Willhite Jr. wrote in the court's decision.
The appeals court added that prosecutors argued two theories, and it
was unclear if the jury convicted Morales because the defendant tricked
the victim or because sex with a sleeping person is defined as rape by
law.
The court said the case should be retried to ensure the jury's conviction is supported by the latter argument.
The decision also urges the
Legislature to examine the law, which was first written in response to
cases in England that concluded fraudulent impersonation to have sex
wasn't rape because the victim would consent, even if they were being
tricked into thinking the perpetrator was their husband.
Willhite noted that the law has been applied inconsistently over the years in California.
In 2010, a similar law in Idaho
prevented an unmarried woman from pressing rape charges after being
tricked into sex with a stranger by her then-boyfriend.
The judge called what happened
"despicable" but said the state's law left the court with no choice.
Idaho's law was amended to cover all women in 2011.
Morales' attorney Edward Schulman declined comment when reached by phone Thursday.
Prior to the conviction, Schulman
had argued Morales believed the sex was consensual because the victim
responded to his kisses and caresses, according to the decision.
end quote from:
-
California judges overturn a rape conviction, saying an 1872 law doesn't protect single women.Well. This is certainly a strange turn of events. What this likely means that that the State Assembly will have to pass another law that applies to single women and possibly (Single men?)
No comments:
Post a Comment