Worth Repeating

I wrote recently something that I think is worth repeating at least once and here basically is what I said before:

Is it worth America's time and money to strike Syria right now under these circumstances?
The answer likely is "No!" for a whole bunch of reasons.

But, if I phrase it differently like saying: "Would the world be better off if the U.S. struck Syria?"
The answer then is definitely "Yes!"

The reason for this is the thousands and millions of people who would not die or be maimed from Chemical and nuclear weapons because of this attack in the present and future of Earth.

So, if Obama attacked Syria it would definitely save millions of future lives from Chemical and Nuclear weapons. But, it is dangerous for the U.S. to do because of how unstable Iran and Syria and the Middle east are now.

The argument could also be made that given the craziness in the Middle East now, we might need these cruise missiles to defend our own country from who know who? , if things keep spinning out of control in more and more nations there.

However, my thought is that the misery if this gets worse will mostly be limited to Northern Africa, the Middle East and Southern Europe in a World War II type scenario mostly limited to the Middle East. However, millions (10s of millions of homeless people will likely flood the middle east and Southern Europe if this whole thing gets much worse as it appears to be doing now.

IF the oil from Iran, Saudi Arabia and Libya stops all at once you may see the Armies and Navies of literally all nations on earth that want to economically survive there fighting in one way or another.

IT could be said this way as well. "Millions more people will likely die n the next 10 to 50 years if Obama does not attack Syria now."

Though this sounds really paradoxical, this likely is the truth. 

So, through this convoluted logic if you want Obama not to attack you are advocating the depopulation of Earth through Chemical and Nuclear means in the near and far future.

As an intuitive and as someone who uses logic too this is both an intuitive and logical outcome of Obama not attacking Syria now within a month or two.

However, it is possible that it is too late for Obama to attack Syria. But maybe a political solution where Assad gives up his weapons and never uses them again might create a similar outcome. maybe.

Here is the really strange thing. Obama doing the right thing and attacking Syria would have been the single most important thing he ever did for the whole world. And yet, he likely wouldn't have been praised for it even though it likely would have saved millions of lives in the future. go figure.