WASHINGTON ― Donald Trump
will bring Michael Flynn ― a former head of the Defense Intelligence
Agency who was paid by a Russian state-funded television network to
speak at its 10th-anniversary gala ― to his first national security
briefing on Wednesday.
Flynn, a retired lieutenant general and high-profile adviser to Trump, has attracted attention since
he was pushed out of government in 2014 for criticisms of what he says
is the Obama administration’s failure to confront “radical Islam,” his
role as an analyst on the Russian network RT, and his embrace of Trump. ABC News reported
on Tuesday that Flynn, along with New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, would
accompany Trump to his first top-secret briefing, heightening critics’
fears that the Trump camp would gain access to secrets it could
potentially leak to contacts in the Kremlin. But former intelligence
officials familiar with the the briefings process said it’s unlikely
that the presidential nominees or their advisers will be looped in on
critical secrets until after the election in November. It’s not unusual for presidential
nominees to bring national security aides to classified briefings. The
candidates are automatically eligible for briefings after receiving
their party’s nomination, but aides must first be vetted and granted an
expedited security clearance, David Priess, author of The President’s Book of Secrets,
said in a phone interview. Priess, a former CIA analyst and briefer,
said he was not aware of any nominee’s adviser ever being barred from
attending a briefing. A spokesman from the Office of the
Director of National Intelligence, which oversees the classified
meetings, declined to elaborate on the vetting process for the aides who
accompany nominees. If the intelligence community isn’t
alarmed by Flynn’s post-government connections with Russia and its
propaganda outlet, it could be an indication of the limited information
that will be provided in Wednesday’s briefing.
Intelligence
officials brief presidential nominees because one will end up serving
in the White House. But one won’t, so officials don’t share sources,
intelligence-gathering methods, or details of ongoing covert operations,
Priess said. “It’s intended to be an overview of the hotspots around the globe,” he said. “It’s not intended to be absolutely comprehensive.” Michael Morell, former acting director of the CIA, echoed this assessment in an interview with The Cipher Brief. When classified briefings for
presidential candidates began in 1952 under then-President Harry Truman,
the goal was to prepare potential commander in chiefs for the array of
threats facing the U.S. The reason for the briefings has since evolved,
according to Priess, into an effort to prevent candidates from
inadvertently saying something that may reduce their options in the
future or undermine current national security policy. Because the briefings are rooted in
tradition rather than law, the sitting president has final say on who
will be briefed and what information they receive. Typically, the
president delegates full control of the briefings to the intelligence
community ― which makes a deliberate effort to ensure that the nominees
receive the same information. Morell, who has endorsed
former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s candidacy, said the
briefings could differ simply because of Clinton’s experience on
national security issues. “I would expect the briefing for
Secretary Hillary Clinton to delve into issues more deeply and to be
more of a dialogue than the briefing for Donald Trump, which I would
expect to be more of a tutorial, more of a first cut at the issues, with
the need to provide the history and background on issues,” Morell said
in the interview with The Cipher Brief. If Clinton gains access to new
information as a result of a back-and-forth with intelligence officials,
said Priess, the briefers would likely feel obliged to share that
information with Trump to avoid “even the perception of bias.” The intelligence community’s
discretion to withhold especially sensitive information from nominees
and their advisers ends Nov. 8, when the next commander in chief is
chosen. Trump appears increasingly aware of the poor optics of his past praise of Russian President Vladimir Putin and his decision to stock his small foreign policy team with outspokenly pro-Russia advisers. On Monday, the Trump team assembled a list of news clips into a press release
accusing Clinton of having close ties to Putin that deserve scrutiny.
The timing of that accusation makes Trump’s decision to bring Flynn to
his first briefing a dubious political move. The explanation for that decision was
offered through anonymous sources to Fox News reporter John Roberts on
Tuesday, who said Flynn was coming to “interpret the reports” because
“the Trump campaign is not confident of the quality of the intelligence
they will receive.”
No comments:
Post a Comment