What they are in some ways is like Automatic Driving Features on a car. They don't necessarily drive the car completely but they are a helpful thing for some people who have the balls to use them like myself and my oldest daughter.
However, my original point of saying that AI CEOs are a way to limit liability to humans is also true. For example, if you car drives itself and you are not present in that car are you liable for what happens to people from your automatically driven car without you present in the car?
This might still be ambiguous liability wise most if not all places worldwide. How do you create a legal liability without being present for that legal liability?
So, my point before is that the main reason for using AI CEOs would be to limit human liability for the actions of those AI CEOs and this will likely be problematic legally for many countries for years to come including the U.S. and Europe.
So, in other words the real Human CEO might just be using the AI CEO as a front for whatever that human (hidden CEO) wants to do without any liability for those actions at all worldwide.
It's sort of like how customer service Bots talking to you on the phone are protecting the real owners of that company from having to deal with you at all.
And how we all deal with all these things in the short and long run is what our future is going to be. It's up to all of us what we will put up with in other words.
So, if you don't like something and want it to be better say something.
No comments:
Post a Comment