Showing posts with label But. Show all posts
Showing posts with label But. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 22, 2020

But, if I multiply by 3 the 145,688

you have a 1 in around 750 chance of dying of coronavirus. Over time the bigger numbers are going to drop as more people die of this in the U.S.

(multiplying by 3 gives you a more realistic number of people both tested and not tested dying of coronavirus in the U.S. by the way if you were wondering.

I expect it likely to get down to around a 1 in 50 chance by this time next year or a 2% chance of dying of coronavirus of all Americans by then.

But, when vaccines start to be used it could get better or much worse because they rushed all this so much the cure could be worse than the disease if they aren't careful worldwide.

Monday, January 22, 2018

Helping the Dreamers is the Moral thing to do, But

The reality of the situation is far more complicated than that. When you have a president whose father was KKK and brainwashed Trump to be the same, when you have Steven Miller who is even more extreme than Trump (in regard to Immigration). When the presidency and the House and the Senate are ALL Republican controlled, unless you are very pragmatic all this just blows up in everyone's face.

I have been watching how government functions (or maybe better said "It never worked very well at best") for 70 years now almost (if you consider that is how old I will be this year. But, in 1952 my Grandfather bought a big black and white TV set and I watched my first Republican Convention and watched General Eisenhower become president from there. Since I hadn't really been allowed to watch TV before this and I was about 4 at the time this made a really big impression on me at the time and after.

But, still as bad as it can get (our government) it  looks much better than what most other nations of the world have come up with (or haven't come up with more to the point).

So, after watching the craziness of our government at all levels for 70 years I understand usually what is going to happen next.

If we are really lucky the moral thing to do will be what actually happens. If we are really unlucky the Dreamers will all be deported by the Trump government before the 2018 elections (or soon after).

These are crazy times folks and there are variables up the ying yang at this point that aren't usually in place.

So, can anyone guarantee the "Dreamers can stay?" NO! not really. But, it is the hope that enough people will make enough noise on their behalf (both Republicans and Democrats) to force the Republican leadership to let them stay even if the Democrats have to build a wall on the southern border to do it!





Friday, April 7, 2017

Peter Bergen: Trump's attack on Syria -- a decisive action, a good speech,but

Anytime
  1. begin quote from:

    Trump's attack on Syria -- a decisive action, a good speech,but...

    www.cnn.com/2017/04/07/opinions/us-raid-on-syria-key-questio...
    17 hours ago ... President Donald Trump gave one of the best speeches he has ever delivered when he announced U.S. cruise missile attacks in Syria but ... 

    Trump's attack on Syria -- a decisive action, a good speech, but now what?

    Trump: Assad choked out the helpless

    Trump: Assad choked out the helpless 02:48

    Story highlights

    • Trump gave one of his best speeches but many key questions surround the US missile strikes in Syria, writes Peter Bergen
    • Were the strikes only a warning shot for Syrian dictator al Assad, or will they be part of larger campaign against him?
    Peter Bergen is CNN's national security analyst, a vice president at New America and a professor of practice at Arizona State University. He is the author of "United States of Jihad: Investigating America's Homegrown Terrorists."
    (CNN)President Donald Trump gave one of the best speeches he has ever delivered when he announced late Thursday that he had ordered US cruise missile attacks in Syria -- and that they were directed at the base that sent off the airstrikes on Tuesday that killed dozens with nerve gas, including many women and children.
    From his estate in Palm Beach, Trump, visibly moved, described the "beautiful babies" whose lives has been choked out by the gas attacks. In acting against the Syrians over the use of chemical weapons, Trump chose a course that his predecessor, Barack Obama, avoided, even after drawing a "red line" on the issue.
    The move was the highest profile use of American military force since Trump took office and it raises several urgent questions for the administration:
    1. Were the cruise missile strikes only a warning shot for the Syrian dictator Bashar al Assad, or will they be part of larger campaign against him?
    The United States has previously launched cruise missile strikes to "send a message" in which the message wasn't exactly received -- for instance, the cruise missile strikes against an al Qaeda base in Afghanistan that followed the group's attacks on two US embassies in Africa in 1998 that killed more than 200 people. Three years later al Qaeda carried out the 9/11 attacks. The message of the cruise missile strikes in that case clearly did not deter the enemy.
    Officials in the George W. Bush administration later criticized the cruise missile strikes that were ordered by President Bill Clinton in Afghanistan in 1998 as only "pounding sand." Will historians take a similar view of Thursday's strikes?
    2. The war in Syria has displaced 14 million Syrians and half a million have been killed since Assad unleashed a brutal war on his own population six years ago. Does the Trump administration have a larger plan to protect Syrian civilians going forward?
    Already the Trump administration -- despite legal challenges -- has attempted to ban Syrian refugees who are largely women and children from entering the United States. These Syrian refugees are not terrorists. They are fleeing the brutal terrorism of the Assad regime and the brutal terrorism of ISIS. They are the victims of terrorism, not its perpetrators.
    On the campaign trail, candidate Trump occasionally raised the idea of creating "safe zones" for Syrian civilians.
    Is the next step for the Trump administration the creation of such zones? After all, one set of cruise missile strikes will hardly protect the millions of Syrian civilians who are currently at the mercy of the Assad regime.
    Follow CNN Opinion
    Join us on Twitter and Facebook
    3. The Russia connection: Assad owes his continuation in power to the intervention of Russia in 2015 to prop up his regime. Given Trump's warm feelings toward Russian President Vladimir Putin and against the backdrop of investigations into relationships between Trump campaign officials and the Russians, do the cruise missile strikes on Thursday mark a clear repudiation by the Trump administration of Putin? And how will the Russian leader react?
    4. How does it end: Machiavelli wisely noted, "Wars begin when you will but they don't end when you please." Already Trump officials are saying that the cruise missile strikes are only a limited response to the sarin gas attack and they are not part of some larger campaign against Assad, but these are exactly the same kinds of statements we have often heard when the United States first gets involved in a conflict overseas.
    5. What is the legal basis for the attack? The Trump administration launched the cruise missile strikes in Syria, an act of war, without a UN resolution or Congressional authorization. Will the Trump administration attempt to get some buy-in from the US Congress for any further military action in Syria? After all, it is Congress that is supposed to authorize US military actions, not the Commander in Chief who is tasked with carrying them out.

Thursday, March 31, 2016

I don't think Trump is qualified to be president, But

I think his non-PC attitude and talking about whatever he is going to say is helpful to all of us in asking the questions we couldn't ask in a lying Politically Correct world that we presently live in.

For example, South Korea and Japan SHOULD have nuclear weapons. It would be in the U.S. strategic advantage (at least for the present) if South Korea and Japan could defend themselves with nuclear weapons against North Korea and China. China might even stop building islands all the way out into the Pacific Ocean if this actually happened.

However, even though as a country I would like to see it have nuclear weapons against Iran, I don't think Saudi Arabia should have nuclear weapons because it's government is too extremist in a religious way for that to be safe (at least at present).

But, you see what I'm getting at?

Trump is actually asking important questions that are all being swept under the rug by all the other candidates including Sanders.

So, precisely because India and Pakistan and China already have nuclear weapons as well as North Korea it would be in those countries (Japan and South Korea) to their advantage to have nuclear weapons too. It would be a strategic advantage to the United States if this happened to balance the power in regard to China and North Korea presently getting out of balance and control in the world.

So it is about balance of power more than any other single thing.

Some of the more important questions are: "Hey are you people in a fairy tale or not? We no longer live in a post World War II world! Everything has changed! Wake UP!"

These are important and true questions that both the U.S. and Europe and the rest of the world need to ask. IF someone doesn't publicly answer these questions the western world will eventually collapse.

This is the whole point here and not political correctness.

We are so worried what everyone is going to think that we cannot save our own lives on into the future.

NO Wonder Putin is laughing at us!

Political correctness is a fatal illness for both the U.S. and Europe at this time.

Get Real everyone!

IF we don't get real pretty soon the western world's days are numbered!

This is reality!

Monday, March 7, 2016

A Dozen Lizard Fossils Trapped In Amber To Offer Clues About The Cretaceous Period – 99 Million Years, But

begin quote from:

A Dozen Lizard Fossils Trapped In Amber To Offer Clues About The Cretaceous Period – 99 Million Years, But ...

The Inquisitr - ‎18 hours ago‎
The discovery of a dozen of these lizards, which stepped or fell into sticky tree resin and couldn't tear themselves loose in the forests where the dinosaurs roamed, was made in Myanmar quite some time ago, reported The Christian Science Monitor. Over ...

Monday, October 26, 2015

You can see the Future, you can even change the future, But

The problem is you likely need to start praying for guidance when you see the future because when you see the future often you can change it some by helping yourself or others survive whatever is coming that you see. However, you can't stop earthquakes or hurricanes or storms or droughts really. But, you can make sure you aren't there when they happen if you see them coming. And sometimes you can save others either by telling them what is coming (this won't always work) or you can redirect people you know to be somewhere else when something bad is coming (this works most of the time but not always.

However, there are always consequences for changing the future even though you save lives. So, it is important to be praying and communing directly with God so God agrees with what you are doing. Otherwise, you likely are going to have some problems. This is a really tricky business. Because after all, we are still mortals (at least in these bodies here on earth) even though it is quite likely that our souls are immortal (never born and never will die). Timeless!

By God's Grace.