It is designed to take print or pictures and designs and convert them into HTML directly which works great sometimes and not so well other times depending upon what I'm converting and who wrote the original code. When it's just print that I write that it automatically converts it to HTML (or a similar compatible computer language) it is usually okay. But, when I quote something some times it's okay and sometimes not.
But, the advantage for me the blogger is it takes around 10% or less time to use an autoencoder than it does to compose your own HTML yourself from scratch. But, I suppose if you had many different subroutines already created and stored some HTML (or compatible programmers) might prefer to plug in their subroutines and do it themselves that way.
However, I think what I do takes the least time and is the most bang for the buck so to speak time wise for me.
So, for me, Autoencoders are one of the best things invented for the internet so far since they went with Servers back in the 1980s and 1990s.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Rosamund Pike: Star of New Amazon Prime Series "Wheel of Time"
- Belize Barrier Reef coral reef system
- SNAP rulings ease shutdown pressure as Thune rebuffs Trump call to end filibuster
- Pacific Ocean from Encyclopedia Britannica
- Flame (the Giant Pacific Octopus) whose species began here on earth before they were taken to another planet by humans in our near future
- Learning to live with Furosemide in relation to Edema
- I put "Blue Sphere" into the search engine for my site and this is what came up.
- Nine dead, dozens injured in crowd surge at Hindu temple in southern India
- Siege of Yorktown 1781
- Transgender members of the Air Force sue government over losing retirement pay
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment