It is designed to take print or pictures and designs and convert them into HTML directly which works great sometimes and not so well other times depending upon what I'm converting and who wrote the original code. When it's just print that I write that it automatically converts it to HTML (or a similar compatible computer language) it is usually okay. But, when I quote something some times it's okay and sometimes not.
But, the advantage for me the blogger is it takes around 10% or less time to use an autoencoder than it does to compose your own HTML yourself from scratch. But, I suppose if you had many different subroutines already created and stored some HTML (or compatible programmers) might prefer to plug in their subroutines and do it themselves that way.
However, I think what I do takes the least time and is the most bang for the buck so to speak time wise for me.
So, for me, Autoencoders are one of the best things invented for the internet so far since they went with Servers back in the 1980s and 1990s.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Here Are the New Members of Donald Trump’s Administration So Far
- Trump and Musk unleash a new kind of chaos on Washington
- Crowdsourcing - Wikipedia
- The state of the Arctic: High temperatures, melting ice, fires and unprecedented emissions
- The AI Translated this about Drone Sightings in Europe from German to English for me
- reprint of: Friday, March 18, 2016 More regarding "As Drones Evolve"
- More regarding "As Drones Evolve"
- "There is nothing so good that no bad may come of it and nothing so bad that no good may come of it": Descartes
- The Future of Climate Action Is Trade Policy
- I tried to get a copy from France from French Wikipedia but it just took me back to English Wikipedia:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment