It is designed to take print or pictures and designs and convert them into HTML directly which works great sometimes and not so well other times depending upon what I'm converting and who wrote the original code. When it's just print that I write that it automatically converts it to HTML (or a similar compatible computer language) it is usually okay. But, when I quote something some times it's okay and sometimes not.
But, the advantage for me the blogger is it takes around 10% or less time to use an autoencoder than it does to compose your own HTML yourself from scratch. But, I suppose if you had many different subroutines already created and stored some HTML (or compatible programmers) might prefer to plug in their subroutines and do it themselves that way.
However, I think what I do takes the least time and is the most bang for the buck so to speak time wise for me.
So, for me, Autoencoders are one of the best things invented for the internet so far since they went with Servers back in the 1980s and 1990s.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Trump to make announcement with Hegseth on shipbuilding from Mar-a-Lago
- Here's how much ACA premiums would have risen this year without tax subsidies:
- As storms inundated Washington state, federal grants for flood mitigation work sat on hold
- quote from Wikipedia: Mark Carney
- How the global food system is impacting obesity and climate change: Study
- What are the real Truths of Life?
- Deputy AG says removing photos from Epstein files has 'nothing to do' with Trump(Sure thing) (ha ha)
- English actors Tom Hiddleston and Zawe Ashton welcome their second child
- gold has surged 70% since the Start of the Year
- I thought this was worth rereading: article from December 23rd regarding Gold surge of 70% this year
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment