Compare that to the United States -- now the world's hardest-hit nation, at least in raw numbers -- which has reported at least 26,000 deaths. Even when you take population size into account, a level of success like Taiwan's could have meant just 83 deaths in the US.
Although Taiwan has high-quality universal health care, its success lies in its preparedness, speed, central command and rigorous contact tracing.
The way each country tests varies, but their death rates among the population contrast just as dramatically. Fewer than one in every 100,000 people in South Korea's population have died from the virus, while in the UK it's around 18. It's almost eight in every 100,000 in the US, JHU data shows.
Lesson #9: You can drive-through test
South Korea's success has been largely down to its testing, according to Dr. Eom Joong Sik from the Gil Medical Center near Seoul. Eom is treating coronavirus patients in hospital and sits on a committee that advises the government in its response.
"Early diagnosis, early quarantine and early treatment are key," he told CNN.
end 2 partial quotes from:
As you can see above in the last graph the U.S. hasn't fared as bad as the UK and Italy but hasn't done as good as Germany, Iceland and South Korea and Taiwan.
The U.S. so far has lost 7.9 people for every 100,000 of our population so far. I'm also thinking that Italy's problem had mostly to do with multiple generations living in the same home because that is more traditional there. But, this time this cultural truth was fatal for Many Italians.
Whereas I think most deaths in the U.S. so far at least were in New York City likely caused from Europe they say, and from Subways, buses, and elevators I'm thinking.
I'm thinking that if Bush 1 or 2 or Bill Clinton or Obama were president that our death rate per 100,000 would be around the same as Germany's.
However, it doesn't make sense to judge all this now because we still have a few more years of people dying of coronavirus and the world has at the very least 5 years of deaths (at least until a good vaccine is developed.
If this was created in a Chinese Lab it is possible that it is designed to mutate over time to greatly reduce earth's population. There are only two countries that might benefit from this and they are China and India. The rest of the countries likely would just get pretty depopulated over the next 5 to 20 years time.
The more educated and rich and scientific the country is the more of their populations that they could save.
The less educated a country's population was and the more superstitious that they were the more would tend to die if they didn't believe in science.
IF someone designed this thing and then ran it through computer models it could have been specifically designed to massively reduce world populations of people over time.
Whereas I think most deaths in the U.S. so far at least were in New York City likely caused from Europe they say, and from Subways, buses, and elevators I'm thinking.
I'm thinking that if Bush 1 or 2 or Bill Clinton or Obama were president that our death rate per 100,000 would be around the same as Germany's.
However, it doesn't make sense to judge all this now because we still have a few more years of people dying of coronavirus and the world has at the very least 5 years of deaths (at least until a good vaccine is developed.
If this was created in a Chinese Lab it is possible that it is designed to mutate over time to greatly reduce earth's population. There are only two countries that might benefit from this and they are China and India. The rest of the countries likely would just get pretty depopulated over the next 5 to 20 years time.
The more educated and rich and scientific the country is the more of their populations that they could save.
The less educated a country's population was and the more superstitious that they were the more would tend to die if they didn't believe in science.
IF someone designed this thing and then ran it through computer models it could have been specifically designed to massively reduce world populations of people over time.
No comments:
Post a Comment