The primary problem is precedent. Once one nation uses something nuclear then other nations are bound to do the same. For example, the U.S. and Russia and other nations use nuclear material on anti-tank rounds in order for them to melt through to the living compartment on tanks. So, whenever these "Nuclear tipped or coated rounds" come into the battle in a sense you have introduced (nuclear weapons) onto a battlefield. It is the same kind of thing with chemical weapons. Once one side uses chemical weapons other sides think it's okay too.
So, the real problem with one or more neutron bombs going off in Yemen is that likely there will be more unless there is a real outcry from the world now.
ON the other hand neutron bombs are pretty expensive and hard to make and somewhat rare. So maybe this will limit their use somewhat too.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Here's how much ACA premiums would have risen this year without tax subsidies:
- Trump to make announcement with Hegseth on shipbuilding from Mar-a-Lago
- gold has surged 70% since the Start of the Year
- How the global food system is impacting obesity and climate change: Study
- Deputy AG says removing photos from Epstein files has 'nothing to do' with Trump(Sure thing) (ha ha)
- As storms inundated Washington state, federal grants for flood mitigation work sat on hold
- reprint of: My Path to Enlightenment from 2011
- Remembering the treasured films of Rob Reiner
- quote from Wikipedia: Mark Carney
- What is the main weakness of a Subaru 2017 PZEV engine: The Oil Seals and Gaskets. Why? (Part 2)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment