The primary problem is precedent. Once one nation uses something nuclear then other nations are bound to do the same. For example, the U.S. and Russia and other nations use nuclear material on anti-tank rounds in order for them to melt through to the living compartment on tanks. So, whenever these "Nuclear tipped or coated rounds" come into the battle in a sense you have introduced (nuclear weapons) onto a battlefield. It is the same kind of thing with chemical weapons. Once one side uses chemical weapons other sides think it's okay too.
So, the real problem with one or more neutron bombs going off in Yemen is that likely there will be more unless there is a real outcry from the world now.
ON the other hand neutron bombs are pretty expensive and hard to make and somewhat rare. So maybe this will limit their use somewhat too.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Here Are the New Members of Donald Trump’s Administration So Far
- Trump and Musk unleash a new kind of chaos on Washington
- Greenland's leader says "we are not for sale" after Trump suggests U.S. takeover
- Crowdsourcing - Wikipedia
- Thousands of Jews have left Israel since the October 7 attacks
- The AI Translated this about Drone Sightings in Europe from German to English for me
- The state of the Arctic: High temperatures, melting ice, fires and unprecedented emissions
- Philosophic Inquiry is nothing more than asking questions and looking for real (Not imagined) answers
- "There is nothing so good that no bad may come of it and nothing so bad that no good may come of it": Descartes
- reprint of: Friday, March 18, 2016 More regarding "As Drones Evolve"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment