The primary problem is precedent. Once one nation uses something nuclear then other nations are bound to do the same. For example, the U.S. and Russia and other nations use nuclear material on anti-tank rounds in order for them to melt through to the living compartment on tanks. So, whenever these "Nuclear tipped or coated rounds" come into the battle in a sense you have introduced (nuclear weapons) onto a battlefield. It is the same kind of thing with chemical weapons. Once one side uses chemical weapons other sides think it's okay too.
So, the real problem with one or more neutron bombs going off in Yemen is that likely there will be more unless there is a real outcry from the world now.
ON the other hand neutron bombs are pretty expensive and hard to make and somewhat rare. So maybe this will limit their use somewhat too.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- 158,008 visits to intuitivefred888
- This is what the code looks like displayed on a page
- Went up into the snow today on Mt. Shasta
- Fulll Article: Iran war's shock waves threaten England's farms 6,000 miles away
- The reliant robin 3 wheeled CAR?
- California bear-suit luxury car scam ends in insurance fraud sentences for 3
- Why scientists are nervous about fungi: Full Article
- Full Article: Desperate for fuel, US allies in Asia are turning to its adversaries instead
- ABC News: Historians sue over Trump's attempt to ignore Presidential Records Act
- The problem with Social Media might be different than you think?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment