The primary problem is precedent. Once one nation uses something nuclear then other nations are bound to do the same. For example, the U.S. and Russia and other nations use nuclear material on anti-tank rounds in order for them to melt through to the living compartment on tanks. So, whenever these "Nuclear tipped or coated rounds" come into the battle in a sense you have introduced (nuclear weapons) onto a battlefield. It is the same kind of thing with chemical weapons. Once one side uses chemical weapons other sides think it's okay too.
So, the real problem with one or more neutron bombs going off in Yemen is that likely there will be more unless there is a real outcry from the world now.
ON the other hand neutron bombs are pretty expensive and hard to make and somewhat rare. So maybe this will limit their use somewhat too.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Dow futures jump 600 points after Trump says he doesn’t plan to get rid of Fed chief: Live updates
- How does one learn to be in the right place at the right time all or most of the time?
- How does the Human Race not go extinct this century?
- We’re suddenly talking about the Great Depression when discussing Trump’s stock market
- What are the 4 types of Anthropology? begin quote from Google AI:
- March 12th 2025 in and on Mt. Shasta
- When I studied Cultural Anthropology at UCSC I was most interested in understanding cultures especially Tibetan Culture.
- ‘He broke barriers’: One of the last survivors of elite group of paratroopers died. He was 108
- Mt. Shasta tourism was the highest ever for winter skiing and such BEFORE Trump was inaugurated
- The Fed Chief Powell HAS to be non-political or the whole economic System will collapse in the U.S. and possibly the world too
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment