The primary problem is precedent. Once one nation uses something nuclear then other nations are bound to do the same. For example, the U.S. and Russia and other nations use nuclear material on anti-tank rounds in order for them to melt through to the living compartment on tanks. So, whenever these "Nuclear tipped or coated rounds" come into the battle in a sense you have introduced (nuclear weapons) onto a battlefield. It is the same kind of thing with chemical weapons. Once one side uses chemical weapons other sides think it's okay too.
So, the real problem with one or more neutron bombs going off in Yemen is that likely there will be more unless there is a real outcry from the world now.
ON the other hand neutron bombs are pretty expensive and hard to make and somewhat rare. So maybe this will limit their use somewhat too.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Full Article: Tracking the resignations, firings and investigations (regarding the Epstein Files) Worldwide!
- Epstein files fallout: Tracking the resignations, firings and investigations Worldwide
- Local residents cannot sleep because of noise from Musk's Gas turbines in Mississippi generating power for GROK in Mississippi
- UT Southwestern detects first reported B.1.617.2 (Indian) variant in North Texas
- Backlash to Trump emboldens Democrats on DHS and ICE as partial shutdown looms
- 780,000 plus visits to intuitivefred888
- Judge appears likely to rule in Sen. Mark Kelly's favor in suit over 'illegal orders' video
- Almost all United Air LInes employees complied with the vaccine mandate
- Morsi declares emergency in three cities
- ICE can't make warrantless arrests in Oregon unless there's risk of escape, judge rules
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment