The primary problem is precedent. Once one nation uses something nuclear then other nations are bound to do the same. For example, the U.S. and Russia and other nations use nuclear material on anti-tank rounds in order for them to melt through to the living compartment on tanks. So, whenever these "Nuclear tipped or coated rounds" come into the battle in a sense you have introduced (nuclear weapons) onto a battlefield. It is the same kind of thing with chemical weapons. Once one side uses chemical weapons other sides think it's okay too.
So, the real problem with one or more neutron bombs going off in Yemen is that likely there will be more unless there is a real outcry from the world now.
ON the other hand neutron bombs are pretty expensive and hard to make and somewhat rare. So maybe this will limit their use somewhat too.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Blank Link Code for HTML Language
- Ukrainian drones hit St Petersburg as Putin's flagship economic forum opens: full article
- The Womb of God
- The Screen door with Gray duct tape?
- Part of Medical PTSD can be that you do not believe then that you are going to survive what you are going through
- Former Trump adviser John Bolton to plead guilty to retaining national security info
- Senate begins vote on Republican bill to fund ICE as GOP is split on Trump’s $1.8B fund
- Most read articles as of Thursday June 4th 2026
- Moderation in all things
- Republican-led House votes to rebuke Trump over war with Iran: Full Article
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment