War elephant
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A
war elephant was an
elephant trained and guided by
humans for combat.
Description
The war elephant's main use was to
charge the enemy, breaking their ranks and instilling terror.
Elephantry are military units with elephant-mounted troops.
[1] They were first employed in
India, the practice spreading out across south-east Asia and westwards into the Mediterranean. Their most famous use in
the West was by the Greek King
Pyrrhus of Epirus and in significant numbers by the armies of
Carthage, including briefly by
Hannibal.
In the Mediterranean, improved tactics reduced the value of the
elephant in battle, while their availability in the wild also decreased.
In the east, where supplies of animals were greater and the terrain
ideal, it was the advent of the
cannon
that finally concluded the use of the combat elephant at the end of the
19th century, thereafter restricting their use to engineering and
labour roles.
Taming
A 17th century depiction of the mythological
war of Lanka in the ancient Indian epic
Ramayana, showing war elephants.
The first elephant species to be tamed was the
Asian Elephant, for use in agriculture. Elephant taming - not full
domestication,
as they are still captured in the wild, rather than being bred in
captivity - may have begun in any of three different places. The oldest
evidence comes from the
Indus Valley Civilization, around roughly 4500 BC.
[2] Archaeological evidence for the presence of wild elephants in the
Yellow River valley during the
Shang Dynasty (1600–1100 BC) of
China may suggest that they also used elephants in warfare.
[3]
The wild elephant populations of Mesopotamia and China declined quickly
because of deforestation and human overpopulation: by c. 850 BC the
Mesopotamian elephants were extinct, and by c. 500 BC the Chinese
elephants were seriously reduced in numbers and limited to areas well
south of the Yellow River.
Capturing elephants from the wild remained a difficult task, but a
necessary one given the difficulties of breeding in captivity and the
long time required for an elephant to reach sufficient maturity to
engage in battle. It is commonly thought that all war elephants were
male because of males' greater aggression, but it is rather because a
female elephant in battle will run from a male; therefore only males
could be used in war, whereas female elephants were more commonly used
for
logistics.
[4]
Antiquity
India, Persia, and Alexander the Great
There is uncertainty as to when elephant warfare first began. The earliest Indian
Vedic hymns, the
Rigveda, dating from the late 2nd and early 1st millennia BC, make reference to the use of elephants for transport - especially
Indra and his divine white elephant,
Airavata - but make no reference to the use of elephants in war, focusing instead on Indra's role in leading horse cavalry.
[5] The later stories of the
Mahabharata and the
Ramayana, dating from around the 4th century BC,
[6] do however mention elephant warfare, suggesting its introduction during the intervening period.
[7]
The ancient Indian kings certainly valued the elephant in war, some
stating that an army without elephants is as despicable as a forest
without a lion, a kingdom without a king or as valour unaided by
weapons.'
[8]
From India, military thinking on the use of war elephants spread westwards to the
Persian Empire, where they were used in several campaigns and in turn came to influence the campaigns of
Alexander the Great. The first confrontation between Europeans and the
Persian war elephants occurred at the Alexander's
Battle of Gaugamela (331 BC), where the Persians deployed fifteen elephants.
[9] These elephants were placed at the centre of the Persian line and made such an impression on the
Macedonian troops
that Alexander felt the need to sacrifice to the God of Fear the night
before the battle - but according to some sources the elephants
ultimately failed to deploy in the final battle owing to their long
march the day before.
[10]
Alexander won resoundingly at Gaugamela, but was deeply impressed by
the enemy elephants and took these first fifteen into his own army,
adding to their number during his capture of the rest of Persia.
By the time Alexander reached the borders of India five years later,
he had a substantial number of elephants under his own command. When it
came to defeating
Porus, who ruled in the
Punjab region of modern-day
Pakistan, Alexander found himself facing a considerable force of between 85 and 100 war elephants
[11][12] at the
Battle of the Hydaspes River.
Preferring stealth and mobility to sheer force, Alexander manoeuvered
and engaged with just his infantry and cavalry, ultimately defeating
Porus' forces, including his elephant corps, albeit at some cost. Porus
for his part placed his elephants individually, at long intervals from
each other, a short distance in front of his main infantry line, in
order to scare off Macedonian cavalry attacks and aid his own infantry
in their struggle against the
phalanx.
Arrian described the subsequent fight:
...whenever the beasts could wheel around, they rushed forth against
the ranks of infantry and demolished the phalanx of the Macedonians,
dense as it was.
The Macedonians adopted the standard ancient tactic of fighting
elephants, loosening their ranks to allow the elephants to pass through
and assailing them with javelins as they tried to wheel around.
Eventually most of
mahouts were killed by javelins, and the panicked and wounded elephants turned on the Indians themselves.
[13]
Looking further east again, however, Alexander could see that the kings of the
Nanda Empire and
Gangaridai
could deploy between 3,000 and 6,000 war elephants. Such a force was
many times larger than the number employed by the Persians and Greeks,
which discouraged Alexander's small band of men and effectively halted
their advance into India.
[14] On his return, Alexander established a force of elephants to guard his palace at
Babylon, and created the post of
elephantarch to lead his elephant units.
[10]
The successful military use of elephants spread further. The successors to Alexander's empire, the
Diadochi, used hundreds of Indian elephants in their wars, with the
Seleucid empire being particularly notable for their use of the animals, still being largely brought from India. Indeed, the
Seleucid–Mauryan war of 305-303 BC ended with the Seleucids ceding vast eastern territories in exchange for 500 war elephants
[15] - a small part of the
Maurya forces, which included up to 9,000 elephants by some accounts.
[16] The Seleucids put their new elephants to good use at the
battle of Ipsus four years later, where they blocked the return of the victorious
Antigonid cavalry, allowing the latter's phalanx to be isolated and defeated. Later in its history, the
Seleucid Empire used elephants in its efforts to crush the
Maccabean Revolt in Judea. The elephants were terrifying to the lighter-armed
Jewish warriors, and the youngest of the
Hasmonean brothers,
Eleazar Maccabeus, famously defeated one of the creatures in the
Battle of Beth Zechariah, sticking a spear under the belly of an elephant he mistakenly believed to be carrying
Seleucid king
Antiochus V, killing the elephant at the cost of Eleazar's own life.
[17]
The first use of war elephants in Europe was made in 318 BC by
Polyperchon,
one of Alexander's generals, when he besieged Megalopolis
(Peloponnesus) during the wars of the Diadochi. He used 60 elephants
brought from Asia with their mahouts. A veteran of Alexander's army,
named Damis, helped the besieged Megalopolitians to defend themselves
against the elephants and eventually Polyperchon was defeated. Those
elephants were subsequently taken by Cassander and transported, partly
by sea, to other battle-fields in Greece. It is assumed that Cassander
constructed the first elephant-transport sea-vessels. Some of the
elephants died of starvation in 316 BC in the besieged city of Pydna
(Macedonia). Others of Polyparchon's elephants were used in various
parts of Greece by Cassander.
[18]
The Mediterranean
The
Ptolemies and the
Carthaginians began acquiring
African elephants for the same purpose, as did the
Numidians and the
Kushites. The animal used was the
North African forest elephant[19] which would become extinct from
over-exploitation.
[citation needed] These animals were smaller than the Asian elephants used by the
Seleucids on the east of the Mediterranean region, particularly those
from Syria,
[20]
which stood 2.5-3.5 meters (8–10 ft) at the shoulder. It is likely that
at least some Syrian elephants were traded abroad. The favorite, and
perhaps last surviving elephant of
Hannibal's 218 B.C.
crossing of the Alps was an impressive animal named
Surus ("the Syrian"), and may have been of Syrian stock,
[21] though the evidence remains ambiguous.
[22]
Since the late 1940s a strand of scholarship has argued that the African forest elephants used by Numidian, Ptolemaic and
Punic armies did not carry howdahs or turrets in combat, perhaps owing to the physical weakness of the species.
[23]
Some allusions to turrets in ancient literature are certainly
anachronistic or poetic invention, but other references are less easily
discounted. There is explicit contemporary testimony that the army of
Juba I of Numidia included turreted elephants in 46 BC.
[24] This is confirmed by the image of a turreted African elephant used on the coinage of
Juba II.
[25] This also appears to be the case with Ptolemaic armies:
Polybius reports that at the
battle of Raphia in 217 BC the elephants of
Ptolemy IV
carried turrets; these beasts were significantly smaller than the Asian
elephants fielded by the Seleucids and so presumably African forest
elephants.
[26] There is also evidence that Carthaginian war elephants were furnished with turrets and howdahs in certain military contexts.
[27]
Farther south, tribes would have had access to the
African savanna elephant.
[28]
Although much larger than either the African forest elephant or the
Asian elephant, these proved difficult to tame for war purposes and were
not used extensively.
[29] Some Asian elephants were traded westwards to the Mediterranean markets;
Pliny the Elder
stated that the Sri Lankan elephants, for example, were larger, fiercer
and better for war than local elephants. This superiority, as well as
the proximity of the supply to seaports, made Sri Lanka's elephants a
lucrative trading commodity.
[30]
Although the use of war elephants in the Mediterranean is most famously associated with the wars between
Carthage and
Rome, the introduction of war elephants was primarily the result of the Greek kingdom of
Epirus. King
Pyrrhus of Epirus brought twenty elephants to attack the Romans at the
battle of Heraclea in 280 BC, leaving some fifty additional animals, on loan from Pharaoh
Ptolemy II,
on the mainland. The Romans were unprepared for fighting elephants, and
the Epirot forces routed the Romans. The next year, the Epirots again
deployed a similar force of elephants, attacking the Romans at the
battle of Asculum.
This time the Romans came prepared with flammable weapons and
anti-elephant devices: these were ox-drawn wagons, equipped with long
spikes to wound the elephants, pots of fire to scare them, and
accompanying screening troops who would hurl javelins at the elephants
to drive them away. A final charge of Epirot elephants won the day
again, but this time Pyrrhus had suffered very heavy casualties - a
Pyrrhic victory.
Perhaps inspired by these victories, Carthage developed its own use
of war elephants and deployed them extensively during the First and
Second
Punic Wars.
The performance of the Carthaginian elephant corps was rather mixed,
illustrating the need of proper tactics to take advantage of the
elephant's strength and cover its weaknesses. At
Adyss in 255 BC, the Carthaginian elephants were ineffective due to the terrain, while at the
battle of Panormus in 251 BC the Romans'
velites were able to terrify the Carthaginian elephants being used unsupported, which fled from the field. At the
battle of Tunis
however the charge of the Carthaginian elephants helped to disorder the
legions, allowing the Carthaginian phalanx to stand fast and defeat the
Romans. During the
Second Punic War,
Hannibal famously led an army of war elephants across the
Alps—although unfortunately many of them perished in the harsh conditions. The surviving elephants were successfully used in the
battle of Trebia,
where they panicked the Roman cavalry and Gallic allies. The Romans
eventually developed effective anti-elephant tactics, leading to
Hannibal's defeat at his final
battle of Zama in 202 BC; his elephant charge, unlike the one at the battle of Tunis, was ineffective because the disciplined Roman
maniples simply made way for them to pass.
Rome brought back many elephants at the end of the
Punic Wars,
and used them in its campaigns for many years afterwards. The conquest
of Greece saw many battles in which the Romans deployed war elephants,
including the invasion of
Macedonia in 199 BC, the battle of
Cynoscephalae 197 BC,
[31] the battle of
Thermopylae,
[32] and the battle of
Magnesia in 190 BC, during which
Antiochus III's fifty-four elephants took on the Roman force of sixteen. In later years the Romans deployed twenty-two elephants at
Pydna in 168 BC.
[33]
The role of the elephant force at Cynoscephalae was particularly
decisive, as their quick charge shattered the unformed Macedonian left
wing, allowing the Romans to encircle and destroy the victorious
Macedonian right. A similar event also transpired at Pydna. The Romans'
successful use of war elephants against the Macedonians might be
considered ironic, given that it was Pyrrhus who first taught them the
military potential of these beasts.
They also featured throughout the Roman campaign against the
Celtiberians in Hispania and against the
Gauls. Famously, the Romans used a war elephant in the invasion of
Britain,
one ancient writer recording that "Caesar had one large elephant, which
was equipped with armor and carried archers and slingers in its tower.
When this unknown creature entered the river, the Britons and their
horses fled and the Roman army crossed over,"
[34] - although he may have confused this incident with the use of a similar war elephant in
Claudius' final
conquest of Britain.
At least one elephant skeleton with flint weapons that has been found
in England was initially misidentified as these elephants, but later
dating proved it to be a mammoth skeleton from the
stone age.
[35]
By the time of Claudius however, such animals were being used by the
Romans in single numbers only - the last significant use of war
elephants in the Mediterranean was against the Romans at the
battle of Thapsus, 46 BC, where
Julius Caesar armed his
fifth legion (
Alaudae)
with axes and commanded his legionaries to strike at the elephant's
legs. The legion withstood the charge, and the elephant became its
symbol. Thapsus was the last significant use of elephants in the West.
[36] The remainder of the elephants seemed to have been thrown into panic by Caesar's archers and slingers.
The
Parthian dynasty of Persia occasionally used war elephants in their battles against the
Roman Empire[citation needed] but elephants were of substantial importance in the army of the subsequent
Sassanid dynasty.
[37]
The Sassanids employed the animals in many of their campaigns against
their western enemies. One of the most memorable engagements was the
Battle of Vartanantz in 451 AD, at which the
Sassanid elephants terrified the
Armenians. Another example is the
Battle of al-Qādisiyyah of 636 AD, in which a unit of thirty-three elephants was used, albeit less successfully, against the invading
Arab forces. The Sassanid elephant corps held primacy amongst the Sassanid cavalry forces and was recruited from
India. The elephant corps was under a special chief, known as the
Zend−hapet, or "Commander of the Indians," either because the animals came from that country, or because they were managed by natives of
Hindustan.
[38]
The Sassanid elephant corps was never on the same scale as others
further east, however, and after the fall of the Sassanid empire the use
of war elephants died out in the region.
The Far East
In China, the use of war elephants was relatively rare compared to other locations.
[39][40] Their earliest recorded use took place as late as 554 AD when the
Western Wei deployed two armored war elephants from
Lingnan in battle, guided by
Malay slaves, and equipped with wooden towers, and swords fastened onto their trunks.
[39] The elephants were turned away by archers' arrows.
[39]
The
Han Dynasty of the 2nd century BC fought against
Nanyue and
Yue[disambiguation needed] kingdoms of South East Asia (ancient proto
Sino-
Vietnamese)
that did employ war elephants. Common tactics used to repel these
elephants included massed crossbow or artillery fire, and digging pits
or trenches filled with spikes.
By comparison, neighbouring states significantly embraced the use of war elephants.
Sri Lankan history records indicate elephants were used as mounts for kings leading their men in the battlefield,
[41] with individual mounts being recorded in history. The elephant
Kandula was King
Dutugamunu's mount and
Maha Pambata, 'Big Rock', the mount of King
Elara during their historic encounter on the battlefield in 200 BC, for example.
[42] In what is now modern day
Vietnam, in 602 AD the
Champan army employed war elephants against the invading
Sui Chinese army.
[43] The Sui troops led the elephants into a trap of falling into deep pits dug by them, also making extensive use of
crossbows.
[43]
Middle Ages
A Romanesque painting of a war elephant. Spain, 11th century.
In
Islamic history there is a significant event known as The
Year of the Elephant, approximately equating to 570
AD. At that time
Abraha, the
Christian ruler of
Yemen marched upon the
Kaaba,
intending to demolish it. He had a large army, which included one or
more elephants, (as many as eight, in some accounts). However, the
(single or lead) elephant, whose name was Mahmud, is said to have
stopped at the boundary around Mecca, and refused to enter - which was
taken by both the Meccans and their Yemenite foes as a serious omen.
According to Islamic tradition, it was in this year that
Muhammad was born.
[44]
In the
Middle Ages, elephants were seldom used in Europe.
Charlemagne took his one elephant,
Abul-Abbas, when he went to fight the Danes in 804, and the
Crusades gave
Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II the opportunity to capture an elephant in the
Holy Land, the same animal later being used in the capture of
Cremona
in 1214, but the use of these individual animals was more symbolic than
practical, especially when contrasting food and water consumption of
elephants in foreign lands and the harsh conditions of the crusades.
The
Khmer army waged war with elephants against the
Cham in the 12th century.
Farther east, elephants continued to be used in warfare. In India the
Chola dynasty and the
Western Chalukya Empire maintained a large number of war elephants in the 11th and 12th century.
[45] The war elephants of the
Chola dynasty carried on their backs fighting towers which were filled with soldiers who shoot arrows at long range.
[46] The
Mongols faced war-elephants in
Khorazm,
Burma,
Vietnam and
India throughout the 13th century.
[47] Despite
their unsuccessful campaigns in Vietnam and
India, the Mongols defeated the war elephants outside
Samarkand by using
catapults and
mangonels, and in Burma by showering
arrows from their famous
composite bow.
[48] Genghis and
Kublai both retained captured elephants as part of their entourage.
[49] Another central Asian invader,
Timur
faced similar challenges a century later. In 1398 Timur's army faced
more than one hundred Indian elephants in battle and almost lost because
of the fear they caused amongst his troops. Historical accounts say
that the Timurids ultimately won by employing an ingenious strategy:
Timur tied flaming straw to the back of his
camels
before the charge. The smoke made the camels run forward, scaring the
elephants, who crushed their own troops in their efforts to retreat.
Another account of the campaign reports that Timur used oversized
caltrops to halt the elephants' charge.
[50] Later, the Timurid leader used the captured animals against the
Ottoman Empire.
King Rajasinghe I laid siege to the
Portuguese fort at
Colombo,
Sri Lanka, in 1558 with an army containing 2200 elephants, used for
logistics and siege work.
[51]
The Sri Lankans had continued their proud traditions in capturing and
training elephants from ancient times. The officer in charge of the
royal stables, including the capture of elephants, was called the
Gajanayake Nilame,
[51] while the post of
Kuruve Lekham controlled the Kuruwe or elephant men
[51]
- the training of war elephants was the duty of the Kuruwe clan who
came under their own Muhandiram, a Sri Lankan administrative post.
In the
Southeast Asia, the powerful
Khmer Empire
had come to regional dominance by the 9th century AD, drawing heavily
on the use of war elephants. Uniquely, the Khmer military deployed
double cross-bows on the top of their elephants. With the collapse of Khmer power in the 15th century, the successor region powers of
Burma (now Myanmar) and Siam (now
Thailand)
also adopted the widespread use of war elephants. In many battles of
the period it was the practice for leaders to fight each other
personally on elephants. One famous battle occurred when the Burmese
army attacked Siam's
Kingdom of Ayutthaya. The war was concluded when the Burmese crown prince
Mingyi Swa was killed by Siamese King
Naresuan in
personal combat on elephant in 1593.
[52]
In Thailand, the king or general rode on the elephant's neck and
carried a long pole with a sabre at the end, plus a metal hook for
controlling the elephant. Sitting behind him on a
howdah, was a signaller, who signalled by waving of a pair of peacock feathers. Above the signaller was the
chatras,
consisting of progressively stacked circular canopies, the number
signifying the rank of the rider. Finally, behind the signaller on the
elephant's back, was the steerer, who steered via a long pole. The
steerer may have also carried a short musket and a sword.
[53]:40–41
Farther north, the Chinese continued to reject the use of war
elephants throughout the period, with the notable exception of the
Southern Han
during the 10th century AD - the "only nation on Chinese soil ever to
maintain a line of elephants as a regular part of its army".
[39]
This anomaly in Chinese warfare is explained by the geographical
proximity and close cultural links of the southern Han to Southeast
Asia.
[39] The military officer who commanded these elephants was given the title "Legate Digitant and Agitant of the Gigantic Elephants."
[54] Each elephant supported a wooden tower that could allegedly hold ten or more men.
[55] For a brief time, war elephants played a vital role in Southern Han victories such as the invasion of
Chu in 948 AD,
[55] but the Southern Han elephant corps were ultimately soundly defeated at Shao in 971 AD, decimated by
crossbow fire from troops of the
Song Dynasty.
[55]
As one academic has put it, "thereafter this exotic introduction into
Chinese culture passed out of history, and the tactical habits of the
North prevailed."
[55]
However, as late as the Ming dynasty in as far north as Beijing, there
were still records of elephants being used in Chinese warfare, namely in
1449 where a Vietnamese contingent of war elephants helped the Ming
Dynasty defend the city from the Mongols.
[56]
Modern era
The Elephant Battery in Peshawar.
With the advent of
gunpowder warfare in the late 15th century, the balance of advantage for war elephants on the battlefield began to change. While
muskets had limited impact on elephants, which could withstand numerous volleys,
[57] cannon
fire was a different matter entirely—an animal could easily be knocked
down by a single shot. With elephants still being used to carry
commanders on the battlefield, they became even more tempting targets
for enemy artillery.
Nonetheless, in south-east Asia the use of elephants on the
battlefield continued up until the end of the 19th century. One of the
major difficulties in the region was terrain, and elephants could cross
difficult terrain in many cases more easily than horse cavalry. Burmese
forces used war elephants to oppose British forces until the
First Anglo-Burmese War March–April 1825 battle of Danubyu, where they were stopped by
Congreve rocket fire. The
Siamese Army continued utilising war elephants armed with
jingals up until the
Franco-Siamese War of 1893, while the Vietnamese used them in battle as late as 1885, during the
Sino-French War.
Into the 20th century, non-battle-trained elephants were used for other military purposes as late as
World War II,
[58] particularly because the animals could perform tasks in regions that were problematic for modern vehicles. Sir
William Slim, commander of the
XIVth Army wrote about elephants in his introduction to
Elephant Bill: "They built hundreds of bridges for us, they helped to build and launch more ships for us than
Helen
ever did for Greece. Without them our retreat from Burma would have
been even more arduous and our advance to its liberation slower and more
difficult."
[59]
Elephants are now more valuable to many armies in
failing states for their
ivory than as transport, and many thousands of elephants have died during civil conflicts due to
poaching. They are classed as a
pack animal in a
U.S. Special Forces field manual issued as recently as 2004, but their use by US personnel is discouraged because elephants are an
endangered species.
[60] The last recorded use of elephants in war occurred in 1987 when
Iraq was alleged to have used them to transport heavy weaponry for use in
Kirkuk.
[citation needed]
Tactical use
There were many military purposes for which elephants could be used.
In battle, war elephants were usually deployed in the centre of the
line, where they could be useful to prevent a charge or to conduct one
of their own. Their sheer size and their terrifying appearance made them
valued heavy cavalry.
[61] Off the battlefield, they could carry heavy
material and provided a useful means of transport before mechanized vehicles rendered them mostly obsolete.
An elephant charge could reach about 30 km/h (20 mph), and unlike horse
cavalry, could not be easily stopped by an
infantry
line setting spears. Such a charge was based on pure force: elephants
crashing into an enemy line, trampling and swinging their tusks. Those
men who were not crushed were at least knocked aside or forced back.
Moreover, elephants could inspire terror in an enemy unused to fighting
them - even the very disciplined
Romans - and could cause the enemy to break and flee.
Horses unaccustomed to the smell of elephants also panicked easily. The elephants' thick hide gave them considerable protection,
[dubious – discuss]
while their height and mass protected their riders. Some elephants were
even equipped with their own armor to further protect them. Many
generals preferred to base themselves atop elephants so as to get a
better view of the battlefield.
The elephant Citranand attacking another, called Udiya, during the
Mughal campaign against the rebel forces of Khan Zaman and Bahadur Khan
in 1567.
In addition to charging, the elephants could provide a safe and
stable platform for archers to shoot arrows in the middle of the
battlefield, from which more targets could be seen and engaged. The
archery evolved into more advanced weapons, and several
Khmer and Indian kings used giant crossbow platforms (similar to the
ballista)
to shoot long armor-piercing shafts to kill other enemy war elephants
and cavalry. The late 16th century AD also saw the use of
culverin and
jingals on elephants, an adaptation to the
gunpowder age that ultimately drove elephants from the battlefield.
Elephants were further enhanced with their own weaponry and armour. In
India and
Sri Lanka,
heavy iron chains with steel balls at the end were tied to the trunks
of war elephants, which the animals were trained to swirl menacingly and
with great skill. Numerous cultures designed elephant
armour, aiming to protect the body and legs of the animal while leaving his trunk free to attack the enemy.
Tusk swords were sometimes employed. Larger animals could also carry a protective tower on their backs, called a
howdah.
Further east, large numbers of men were carried, with the senior
commander either utilising the howdah or leading from his seat on the
elephant's neck. The driver, called a
mahout, was responsible for controlling the animal. In many armies, the
mahout also carried a
chisel-blade and a hammer to cut through the spinal cord and kill the animal if the elephant went berserk.
[62]
War elephants had tactical weaknesses, however, that enemy forces
often learnt to exploit. Elephants had a tendency to panic themselves:
after sustaining painful wounds or when their driver was killed they
would run amok,
[61]
indiscriminately causing casualties as they sought escape. Their
panicked retreat could inflict heavy losses on either side. Experienced
Roman infantry often tried to sever their trunks, causing an instant
panic, and hopefully causing the elephant to flee back into its own
lines. Fast skirmishers armed with javelins were also used to drive them
away, as javelins and similar weapons could madden an elephant.
Elephants were often unarmoured and vulnerable to blows to their flanks,
so Roman infantry armed with some sort of flaming object or with a
stout line of pikes, such as
Triarii,
would often attempt to make the elephant turn to expose its flank to
the infantry, making the elephant susceptible to a pike thrust or a
Skirmisher's javelin. The cavalry sport of
tent pegging grew out of training regimes for horsemen to incapacitate or turn back war elephants.
[64] One famous historical method for disrupting elephant units was the
war pig. Ancient writers believed that "elephants are scared by the smallest squeal of a pig",
[65] and the vulnerability was exploited. At the
Megara siege during the
Diadochi wars,
for example, the Megarians reportedly poured oil on a herd of pigs, set
them alight, and drove them towards the enemy's massed war elephants.
The elephants bolted in terror from the flaming squealing pigs.
[66]
The value of war elephants in battle remains a contested issue. In the 19th century, it was
fashionable to contrast
the western, Roman focus on infantry and discipline with the eastern,
exotic use of war elephants that relied merely on fear to defeat their
enemy.
[67]
One writer commented that war elephants "have been found to be skittish
and easily alarmed by unfamiliar sounds and for this reason they were
found prone to break ranks and flee."
[68]
Nonetheless, the continued use of war elephants for several thousand
years attests to their enduring value to the historical battlefield
commander.
Cultural legacy
Entry to the
Gwalior Fort from the
Hathi Pol or "Elephant door", high arches of the door, allowed elephants to pass into the fort.
Elephants in use by
Indian cavalry.
The use of war elephants over the centuries has left a deep cultural
legacy in many countries. Many traditional war games incorporate war
elephants.
Chaturanga, the ancient Indian board game from which Modern chess has gradually developed - calls its
rook Gaja, meaning elephant in Sanskrit, it is still the case in
Chinese Chess. Also in Arabic - and derived from it, in
Spanish - the bishop piece is called
al-fil, Arabic for "elephant"; in
Russian, too, the bishop piece is an elephant (Слон). In
Bengali, the bishop is called 'hati', Bengali for "elephant". In the
Japanese game
shogi, there used to be a piece known as the "
Drunken Elephant"; it was, however, dropped by order of the
Emperor Go-Nara and no longer appears in the version played in contemporary Japan.
Elephant armour, originally designed for use in war, is today usually
only seen in museums. One particularly fine set of Indian elephant
armour is preserved at the Leeds
Royal Armouries Museum,
while Indian museums across the sub-continent display other fine
pieces. The architecture of India also shows the deep impact of elephant
warfare over the years. War elephants adorn many military gateways,
such as those at
Lohagarh Fort for example, while some spiked, anti-elephant gates still remain, for example at
Kumbhalgarh
fort. Across India, older gateways are invariably much higher than
their European equivalents, in order to allow elephants with
howdahs to pass through underneath.
War elephants also remain a popular artistic trope, either in the
Orientalist painting tradition of the 19th century, or in literature following
Tolkien, who popularised a fantastic rendition of war elephants in the form of
oliphaunts.
See also
Notes
No comments:
Post a Comment