- begin quote from:
-
New House rules to allow Democrats to defend Obamacare
(CNN)House Democrats are moving quickly to defend the Affordable Care Act once they retake control of the chamber Thursday.As part of its rules package for the 116th Congress, the party is granting itself authorization to intervene in the lawsuit that threatens to bring down the landmark health reform law. It directs the House's Office of General Counsel to represent lawmakers in any litigation involving the act and authorizes hiring of outside counsel.The House is expected to vote in the coming days on the rules package, which the majority party -- now the Democrats -- adopts at the start of a new Congress.Supporting the Affordable Care Act, including its popular provisions that protect those with pre-existing conditions, helped Democrats retake the House in the midterm elections in November. Since then, the party's leaders have repeatedly said they will swiftly work to uphold the law.A federal judge in Texas last month ruled that the Affordable Care Act, more commonly known as Obamacare, is unconstitutional because Congress eliminated the individual mandate penalty by reducing it to $0, starting this year. This rendered the mandate itself unconstitutional and the rest of the law therefore cannot stand. Earlier this week, District Judge Reed O'Connor issued an order saying that the act can remain in effect pending appeal.The Trump administration is not defending Obamacare, prompting a coalition of Democratic states to step in. California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who is leading the coalition, plans to appeal O'Connor's ruling.The move to intervene, however, is largely symbolic. Some Affordable Care Act supporters say that Democratic lawmakers would be better off passing legislation to address the lawsuit.Intervening, for its part, is unnecessary (because California and other blue states have already intervened), unlawful (because one house of Congress almost certainly lacks standing to sue), and wasteful (because lawyers).See Nicholas Bagley's other TweetsFor instance, Congress could nullify the basis of the judge's decision by raising the penalty amount or declaring the individual mandate severable from the rest of the law, University of Michigan law professor Nicholas Bagley and Richard Primus argued in The Atlantic last month.CORRECTION: This story has been corrected to identify when lawmakers return to the US House of Representatives. New members are sworn in on Thursday.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Here Are the New Members of Donald Trump’s Administration So Far
- Trump and Musk unleash a new kind of chaos on Washington
- Greenland's leader says "we are not for sale" after Trump suggests U.S. takeover
- Crowdsourcing - Wikipedia
- The state of the Arctic: High temperatures, melting ice, fires and unprecedented emissions
- Thousands of Jews have left Israel since the October 7 attacks
- The AI Translated this about Drone Sightings in Europe from German to English for me
- Philosophic Inquiry is nothing more than asking questions and looking for real (Not imagined) answers
- "There is nothing so good that no bad may come of it and nothing so bad that no good may come of it": Descartes
- reprint of: Friday, March 18, 2016 More regarding "As Drones Evolve"
Wednesday, January 2, 2019
New House rules to allow Democrats to defend Obamacare
- begin quote from:
-
New House rules to allow Democrats to defend Obamacare
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment