Showing posts with label DC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DC. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 27, 2026

Judge admonishes Trump administration over plans for Washington, DC, golf course

 begin quote from:

Judge admonishes Trump administration over plans for Washington, DC, golf course

Trump said he plans to close the course Nov. 15.

Judge admonishes Trump administration over plans for Washington, DC, golf course
Eric Lee/Reuters
October 27, 2026, 12:17 PM

A federal judge has ordered a top Department of Justice official back into court after President Donald Trump posted on his social media account affirming that East Potomac Golf Course will close Nov. 15 for renovations — directly contradicting repeated assertions from administration officials in a hearing last week. 

District Judge Ana Reyes has ordered Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward to clarify whether his prior statements to her that there were no plans to close the course remain accurate.

She further ordered Woodward's attendance at a hearing either Friday or Monday where she is expected to press the government for more updates on its compliance with her injunction barring further construction at East Potomac. 

In a sharply worded 70-page ruling, Reyes criticized the Trump administration over its plans for the historic golf course in Washington, D.C., and concluded the administration likely violated environmental laws in the process.

"Rarely, if ever, has the United States Department of Justice urged a federal court not to believe the sitting President," Reyes wrote. "Not to believe him that a cabinet secretary has 'developed' a federal land project. Not to believe him that the secretary's agency will destroy a historic golf course already on the land. Not to believe him that 'Restoration work' will begin 'IMMEDIATELY!' Not to believe him that the course 'will be closed' for over a year. Not to believe what the President has repeatedly told the American public. And yet, here we are."

The case began over golf and long walks, Reyes said, but has now morphed into an effort to reconcile sworn statements made by members of the administration with statements made by Trump.

The administration must give "ten business days' written advance notice before making any irreparable modification to any forms or features of East Potomac Park, pending the outcome of this litigation," Reyes said.

PHOTO: Felled trees at East Potomac Golf Links in Washington
Golfers drive a cart near felled trees after the US President Donald Trump's administration cut down more than 400 trees at historic East Potomac Golf Links, in Washington, DC, US, October 26, 2026.
Eric Lee/Reuters

Hours before the hearing was set to start, the president had posted on social media that construction on East Potomac Golf Course would begin immediately, despite the administration suggesting to the court that it would not.

"If, as DOJ insists, President Trump is wrong, Secretary Burgum can just say so," Reyes wrote. "He has not. That said, at this juncture Plaintiffs carry the burden of showing a final plan likely exists. They have done so. This is confirmed not just by the President's and Secretary's many posts, but also by the Government's actions, not the least of which is the removal of hundreds of healthy, non-invasive trees on no real notice."

The tree removal had been scheduled a week earlier, but Reyes concluded that those involved in the lawsuit had little notice to stop the cutting.

The administration also likely violated environmental laws — specifically the National Environmental Policy Act -- by "segmenting" the environmental impacts of the construction, she said.

Trump said his administration will appeal the ruling, insisting he will move forward with his plans to shut down the course on Nov. 15 to start the project. 

"We are closing the East Potomac Golf Course Site as scheduled on November 15th in order to renovate and rebuild for Competitive (with other such projects!), Safety, Modernization, and Aesthetic reasons," Trump wrote on his social media platform overnight. 

He said the judge's request for updates is "unconstitutional." 

"We believe this Project is totally 'as of right,' and that the judge does not have the Constitutional Right to 'ask for or receive notices,' which are time-consuming, unnecessary, expensive, and unconstitutional. We will immediately appeal this decision," Trump wrote. 

During a gaggle with reporters on Monday night after his Mississippi rally, Trump also said he has a "go-ahead" to work on the renovations and blasted the judge for being an "architectural critic of golf courses."

"It's not my golf course, it's a public course being built in Washington D.C. and it has a go-ahead," Trump said.

He added that the current public course is "extremely dangerous to play" because it is too close together and that he was asking the D.C. Circuit Court for "immediate remedy."

Related Topics

Monday, June 12, 2017

DC, Maryland sue Trump over foreign business dealings

begin quote from:

DC, Maryland sue Trump over foreign business dealings

Politico - ‎17 minutes ago‎
The attorneys general of Maryland and the District of Columbia filed a federal lawsuit against President Donald Trump on Monday, accusing him of violating provisions of the Constitution intended to protect against corruption and seeking to uncover the ...
Trump sued over foreign payments by attorneys general
Two attorneys general sue Trump: Checks and balances 'are failing us'
DC and Maryland sue President Trump, alleging breach of constitutional oath
Major Lawsuit' Against Trump Promised by DC, Maryland Officials
Md., DC suing Trump: Somebody had to do it
Trump faces lawsuit from Maryland, DC attorneys general
 

President Donald Trump is pictured. | Getty
The attorneys general of D.C. and Maryland are suing President Donald Trump and would likely seek Trump's tax returns. | Getty

D.C., Maryland sue Trump over foreign business dealings

The attorneys general of Maryland and the District of Columbia filed a federal lawsuit against President Donald Trump on Monday, accusing him of violating provisions of the Constitution intended to protect against corruption and seeking to uncover the tax returns that the president has thus far been unwilling to release.
The suit focuses on the president’s continued ownership of his family’s business empire, control of which Trump said has been handed over to his two adult sons. But far from the blind trust standard adopted by past presidents, Trump continues to receive some information about the Trump organization, including profit reports, from his sons.
The lawsuit, brought by D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine and Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh, both Democrats, was filed Monday morning in U.S. District Court in Greenbelt, Maryland.
The case focuses primarily on allegations that Trump's business dealings violate the Constitution's foreign emoluments clause, which limits payments to U.S. officials from foreign government sources.
“The suit alleges that President Trump is flagrantly violating the Constitution,” Racine said at a press conference in Washington on Monday afternoon. “Never in the history of this country have we had a president with these kinds of extensive business entanglements.”
Last February, Maryland's Legislature gave Frosh the authority to sue the federal government without the approval of Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican, or the General Assembly, currently controlled by Democrats.
The president’s tax returns, which Trump has refused to release despite a decades-long tradition of presidential candidates releasing them, will be sought through the discovery process if the case is allowed to proceed, Frosh said.
“We will be seeking the president’s financial information, including his tax returns,” the Maryland official said.
The lawsuit accuses Trump, via his businesses, of being “deeply enmeshed with a legion of foreign and domestic government actors.” His continued ownership of the Trump organizations constitutes “unprecedented constitutional violations,” the complaint says.
Even if the attorneys general were to get access to Trump's tax returns, it's unlikely the documents would be made public through this suit, since such records are typically subject to confidentiality restrictions imposed by the courts.
The suit invokes several anti-corruption provisions in the Constitution, including the foreign emoluments clause and another part banning presidents from supplementing their salaries with other payments from the U.S. government or state governments.
At a news conference in January before his inauguration, the president and his legal team announced that the Trump Organization would donate money earned at its hotels from foreign governments to the U.S. Treasury. But last March, the Trump Organization announced that it would not begin making those donations until 2018, an announcement that was followed in May by another one in which the organization declared that it will be “impractical” to single out foreign guests so as to siphon their payments to the Treasury.
The new suit was assigned to Judge Peter Messitte, an appointee of President Bill Clinton
Lawyers from Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a nonprofit watchdog group that goes by the acronym CREW, will act as outside counsel to the two attorneys general in their lawsuit against the president. In addition to its work with Racine and Frosh, CREW has brought its own lawsuit to bear against Trump over alleged Constitutional conflicts, a case that the Justice Department moved late last week that the courts should throw out.
Plans for the suit were first reported by the The Washington Post.