| Livemint | - |
Karzai spokesman Aimal Faizi said the Afghan leader laid out several conditions for his signature to the deal in the meeting, including a US pledge to immediately halt all military raids on, or searches of, Afghan homes.
US says may pull out all troops as Afghan leader holds up deal
US says Karzai has outlined new conditions and is not prepared to sign the bilateral security agreement promptly
Latest News
- 11:15 AM IST
Indian pharma market suffers from side effects - 11:08 AM IST
India considers more Iran oil imports, readies payments - 10:47 AM IST
Gold holds near 1-week high; physical demand drops off - 10:43 AM IST
Bharti Airtel looks to raise funds in Europe for spectrum auction - 10:25 AM IST
United Spirits shares fall on Diageo’s plan to sell Whyte & Mackay
Editor's picks
Sensex rises 388 points as oil prices fall after Iran deal
Diageo may sell Whyte & Mackay on competition concerns in UK
Red tape on grant delayed care for HIV patients, says Global Fund
Pfizer set to change India management structure in line with global model
26/11: Five years on, Pakistan fails to budge on attackers
Also Read
- Barack Obama takes on critics of Iran deal, praises diplomacy
- Afghan President Karzai rejects elders’ advice to back US deal quickly
- US, Japan slam China’s ‘destabilizing’ move on East China Sea airspace
- Afghan government sets conditions for signing US deal
- US gives Afghanistan year-end deadline for crucial security deal
Karzai spokesman Aimal Faizi said the Afghan leader laid out several conditions for his signature to the deal in the meeting, including a US pledge to immediately halt all military raids on, or searches of, Afghan homes. Photo: AFP
Kabul/Washington: Afghanistan’s President Hamid Karzai has refused to sign a security deal with the United States, the White House said, and Washington may have to resort to the “zero option” of withdrawing all American troops from the strife-torn country next year, as it did in Iraq.
Karzai told US national security advisor Susan Rice in Kabul on Monday that the United States must put an immediate end to military raids on Afghan homes and demonstrate its commitment to peace talks before he would sign a bilateral security pact, Karzai’s spokesman said.
The White House said Karzai had outlined new conditions in the meeting with Rice and “indicated he is not prepared to sign the (bilateral security agreement) promptly.”
“Without a prompt signature, the US would have no choice but to initiate planning for a post-2014 future in which there would be no US or NATO troop presence in Afghanistan,” a White House statement quoted Rice as saying.
On Sunday, an assembly of Afghan elders endorsed the security pact, but Karzai suggested he might not sign it until after national elections next spring.
The impasse strengthens questions about whether any US and NATO troops will remain after the end of next year in Afghanistan, which faces a still-potent insurgency waged by Taliban militants and is still training its own military.
US troops have been in Afghanistan since leading multinational forces in ousting the Taliban regime in late 2001.
Just over two years ago, US President Barack Obama pulled the plug on talks with Iraq about keeping a residual American force there after that war. In October 2011, when he announced that decision, there were more than 40,000 troops in the country. By the end of the year, they had all been withdrawn.
In Afghanistan, there are still 47,000 American forces. The United States has been in discussions with Afghan officials about keeping a small residual force of about 8,000 troops there after it winds down operations next year.
US officials, including secretary of state John Kerry and defense secretaryChuck Hagel, have said the bilateral security deal with Afghanistan must be signed by year-end to begin preparations for a post-2014 presence.
Rice, who made a three-day visit to Afghanistan to visit US troops, told Karzai it was “not viable” to defer signing the deal until after the election, the White House said.
The delay “would not provide the United States and NATO allies the clarity necessary to plan for a potential post-2014 military presence,” the White House said.
Conditions
Karzai spokesman Aimal Faizi said the Afghan leader laid out several conditions for his signature to the deal in the meeting, including a US pledge to immediately halt all military raids on, or searches of, Afghan homes.
The Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA) includes a provision allowing raids in exceptional circumstances — when an American life is directly under threat — but it would not take effect until 2015.
This issue is particularly sensitive among Afghans after a dozen years of war between Afghan and foreign forces and Taliban militants.
“It is vitally important that there is no more killing of Afghan civilians by US forces and Afghans want to see this practically,” Faizi said.
Karzai also called on Washington to send remaining Afghan detainees at the US military detention center in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, back to Afghanistan, saying that the Loya Jirga, the assembly of elders and leaders that convened last week to debate the deal, had endorsed the pact with this condition.
Faizi said Karzai also asked the US officials to guarantee that the United States would refrain from endorsing any candidate in national elections next year.
Karzai blamed the United States for meddling in the 2009 presidential election, while his opponents accuse the president of using the pact to ensure his influence in next year’s polls.
US officials have appeared exasperated by Karzai’s stance on the security agreement, which they say is needed to help them plan a future mission that will assist Afghan forces fight militants and that will allow for future aid crucial for the impoverished nation.
The Obama administration has not said when it would make a decision to abandon the talks and commit to pulling all of its troops out of Afghanistan at the end of 2014, as it did in Iraq.
Faizi said the Afghan president had asked his American visitors to return to the US president with his message.
“The ball is in your court now, and get back to us,” he said.
end quote from:
No comments:
Post a Comment