ISIL more dangerous now or would it be more dangerous to U.S. in other form?
answer:
I think it is less dangerous to the United States directly now. However, if it is forced back into just being a terrorist group without land to get money from, I think it then would be more dangerous to the United States Homeland and the homelands of everyone in the coalition in revenge for ending the Islamic State at some point in the future.
However, right now, it is so dangerous to every government in the Middle East's ongoing existence I don't think many people are worrying about this: YET! Also, it is so dangerous towards the extinction of every minority from Shia to Christian to Yazidi to whatever, people aren't thinking this way much yet. The main business is not to have all Shias and Christians and Yazidis in the Middle East go extinct permanently at this point because there might be a danger of this, especially in Iraq and Syria and possibly Lebanon.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Here Are the New Members of Donald Trump’s Administration So Far
- Trump and Musk unleash a new kind of chaos on Washington
- Crowdsourcing - Wikipedia
- The AI Translated this about Drone Sightings in Europe from German to English for me
- The state of the Arctic: High temperatures, melting ice, fires and unprecedented emissions
- reprint of: Friday, March 18, 2016 More regarding "As Drones Evolve"
- More regarding "As Drones Evolve"
- "There is nothing so good that no bad may come of it and nothing so bad that no good may come of it": Descartes
- The Future of Climate Action Is Trade Policy
- I tried to get a copy from France from French Wikipedia but it just took me back to English Wikipedia:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment