ISIL more dangerous now or would it be more dangerous to U.S. in other form?
answer:
I think it is less dangerous to the United States directly now. However, if it is forced back into just being a terrorist group without land to get money from, I think it then would be more dangerous to the United States Homeland and the homelands of everyone in the coalition in revenge for ending the Islamic State at some point in the future.
However, right now, it is so dangerous to every government in the Middle East's ongoing existence I don't think many people are worrying about this: YET! Also, it is so dangerous towards the extinction of every minority from Shia to Christian to Yazidi to whatever, people aren't thinking this way much yet. The main business is not to have all Shias and Christians and Yazidis in the Middle East go extinct permanently at this point because there might be a danger of this, especially in Iraq and Syria and possibly Lebanon.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Because of fighting in Ukraine and Israel Bombing Iran I thought I should share this EMP I wrote in 2011
- "There is nothing so good that no bad may come of it and nothing so bad that no good may come of it": Descartes
- Keri Russell pulls back the curtain on "The Diplomat" (season 2 filming now for Netflix)
- most read articles from KYIV Post
- Historicity of Jesus-Wikipedia
- reprint of: Drones very small to large
- US intelligence officials make last-ditch effort to sound the alarm over foreign election interference
- The ultra-lethal drones of the future | New York Post 2014 article
- Jack Ryan from Prime (4 seasons)
- When I began to write "A Journey through Time"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment