Fallout from sexual allegations
begin quote from:
Opinion: Are men clueless on harassment?
Are men really clueless about sexual harassment?
Story highlights
- Peggy Drexler: Setting aside flat-out predators, some men let gender role confusion override knowing right from wrong
- Drexler: That's no longer an excuse, and all of society needs to make this crystal clear to men and women
Peggy Drexler is the author of "Our Fathers, Ourselves: Daughters, Fathers, and the Changing American Family" and "Raising Boys Without Men." The opinions expressed in this commentary are hers.
(CNN)Six weeks after the first stories broke alleging
that Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein engaged in a decadeslong
pattern of sexual harassment (he denies it), the list of men accused of
similar acts keeps getting longer. Some offer denials, but others offer
more nuanced "explanations":
Charlie Rose,
for example, apologized but added, "I always felt that I was pursuing
shared feelings, even though I now realize I was mistaken." Sen. Al Franken apologized, too, but Michigan Rep. John Conyers only offered, through a spokesman: "The former staffer voluntarily decided to drop the case." Pixar's John Lasseter
apologized and said, in part, "No matter how benign my intent, everyone
has the right to set their own boundaries and have them respected."
Meanwhile, the Alabama Republican party has reiterated its support of Senate candidate Roy Moore (as has President Trump), who faces allegations of sexual abuse (he denies them), and the number of women accusing former President George H.W. Bush
of groping has reached a whopping eight. Responding to four of the
allegations last month, Bush's spokesman "explained" that elder Bush
"has patted women's rears in what he intended to be a good-natured
manner," and apologized. For the more recent allegations, he offered no
comment.
These
and the many other men against whom allegations have been made -- some
quite a bit more serious than patting "women's rears" -- are all
ambitious, smart, powerful men -- surely men whom one would think might
know better than to behave in this way. In some instances, famous men
are alleged to have forced their tongues into an unwilling woman's
mouth, walked around naked, or pulled out their penises to show around.
So why do they do it? And why are there so many? As was proved by the viral #metoo campaign,
which saw hundreds of thousands of women sharing their own stories of
sexual assault, the problem is rampant; sadly, less an exception than
the rule.
One
possible explanation points to a deeply ingrained, hard to shake and
society-wide sexism that teaches men that women are less dominant. Many
men -- and women, for that matter --still believe men do the asking out
and the chasing (often, too, the paying for dinner).
Setting
aside the flat-out predators who walk among us, this misunderstanding
of men's roles may lead some men, especially those in the throes of
sexual attraction, to let their desires override their intellect and
their knowledge of what is wrong and what is right.
It
would be nice to imagine that, in 2017, sexism is an outdated notion in
the mainstream: After all, this is the same culture that created not
just "The Bachelor" but also "The Bachelorette." Times have changed,
right? As Harvey Weinstein put it in his official statement,
"I came of age in the '60s and '70s, when all the rules about behavior
and workplaces were different. That was the culture then."
And
yet there's SO MUCH evidence it's the culture now, too. We've only got
to look at the defeat of a highly qualified, highly prepared, definitely
female presidential candidate by a less qualified male opponent
(himself, let's not forget, accused of sexual assault
by multiple women; he denies it) as proof that sexism lives on. That he
largely based his campaign on bluster and bullying -- and was elected by 52% of men and 41% of women -- only strengthens the point.
Another
explanation for the problem of sexual harassment, and one that
similarly has roots in sexism, is that we still have a hard time
defining (or agreeing on) what constitutes sexual harassment and
assault.
A small recent survey by
car-selling app Instamotor found that many men aren't clear on what
sexual harassment is. Two in every three men surveyed didn't think
repeated unwanted invitations to drinks, dinner, or dates was sexual
harassment. One in five didn't think sexual harassment should be a
fireable offense.
What's more, many such behaviors are learned: In one story that ran on NPR,
a "reformed catcaller" described growing up watching older men he
admired holler at women in his Brooklyn neighborhood. "All my life I
heard girls are cats and boys are dogs ...," he said. "Hollering at
women on the street was what guys were supposed to do, or so I thought."
Certainly, many of the
accusations we've all been hearing over the past weeks seem to extend
well beyond gray areas. But if there is confusion about those gray areas
-- that is, what defines harassment at all -- it's possible there could
be confusion about what is absolutely off-limits, and what is, perhaps,
part of some men's archaic or delusional idea of the male-female mating
dance.
No woman asks to be
assaulted or harassed -- or touched in a manner that makes her feel
uncomfortable. And yet, how else to explain the Bush family spokesman admitting the former president of the United States would often "pat women's rears" in a "good-natured manner" as "David Cop-a-feel"?
Which
means we need to do a better job making damn sure every single man --
and woman -- is clear about what constitutes inappropriate behavior.
That's
hopefully what the current conversation will do. In addition to holding
men accountable for their past actions, it will open up dialogue so
that misunderstanding is no longer an acceptable excuse. Because let it
be known: Whether you're a man or a woman, good-natured rear-patting of
someone you aren't 100% sure would welcome it is never as good-natured
as you might like to believe.
No comments:
Post a Comment