Like many things I have studied here this is pretty inevitable that another Carrington event like 1859 will happen again. It's only a matter of when. And 14 years after the July 2012 event that missed earth that would have at least caused 2 trillion dollars in damage to Satellites and everything electrical that it hit on earth we would still be digging out of this problem 14 years later now in 2026.
I think accepting the fact that this is true will help us survive this when it happens at some point in the future.
The problem is as we become more and more dependent on everything electrical (like we were NOT in 1859 when the Carrington event happened) we become more and more vulnerable.
So, a nuclear blast EMP now is much more unlikely (unless it is the accidental release of doomsday weapons) than a Solar Blast of Plasma that fries everything electrical that is facing the sun when it hits above about 10 feet underground.
If enough people understand this is coming at some point (probably within 100 to 200 years) then maybe people will prepare enough for this so it doesn't create total chaos here on earth when it happens.
For example, I'm not sure this is possible but a 24 hour solar plasma event of a magnitude of 2012 in July could end everything electrical all over the planet and take us back to the stone age in a realistic sense.
Why?
Because a 24 hour burst (theoretically) would end permanently anything electrical that existed on earth at that time.
At least if it was a 10 minute or several hour event that there would be somewhere on the planet that still had electrical things that worked.
However, if you theoretically had a planet spinning like it does and the event was 24 hours or more NOTHING (not one thing electrical) would work ever again.
So, rebuilding our infrastructure after this would be like going back to 1859 again and starting all over with steam engines and telegraph because though we would know how to build things we would have to start over with steam engines and Trains to rebuild it all. Because Cars wouldn't run. planes wouldn't fly, Ships diesel engines wouldn't run without rebuilding all this technology and people would starve and die or in developed nations freak out without any radio, Television, Internet or Cell phones or Smart phones.
So, the level of chaos would be more unimaginable than World War I or World War II as a direct result.
And this doesn't just affect an army or navy or Air Force or even Space Force.
This affects the technology of every living person on the planet.
Nothing would work that was above about 10 feet underground ever again electrical or electronic.
So, this is something that the world needs to think about before all our electrical marvels stop working one day.
So, this is 1000 times worse than any war imaginable might be here on planet earth in it's real time effects on people and all living creatures here on earth.
I think it might be useful to read this that I wrote about a 100 megaton nuclear weapon going off over the U.S. at 528,000 feet because the effect would be the same only it would be from the sun. Click on the EMP button if you want to read about that. It would be the same effect but it wouldn't be a war time event but rather an Act of God from the Sun through Solar Plasma like hit Earth in 1859
begin quote from:
Also, here is more regarding the 1859 Carrington Event too:
Carrington Event
Carrington Event
 Sunspots of 1 September 1859, as sketched by Richard Carrington. A and B mark the initial positions of an intensely bright event, which moved over the course of five minutes to C and D before disappearing. | |
| Coronal mass ejection | |
|---|---|
| Travel time | 17.6 hr (est.) |
| Geomagnetic storm | |
| Initial onset | 1 September 1859 |
| Dissipated | 2 September 1859 |
| Lowest Dst | −0.80 to −1.75 μT (estimate) |
| Impacts | Severe damage to telegraph stations |
Part of solar cycle 10 | |
The Carrington Event was the most intense geomagnetic storm in recorded history, peaking on 1–2 September 1859 during solar cycle 10. It created strong auroral displays that were reported globally and caused sparking and even fires in telegraph stations.[1] The geomagnetic storm was most likely the result of a coronal mass ejection (CME) from the Sun colliding with Earth's magnetosphere.[2]
The geomagnetic storm was associated with a very bright solar flare on 1 September 1859. It was observed and recorded independently by British astronomers Richard Carrington and Richard Hodgson—the first records of a solar flare. A geomagnetic storm of this magnitude occurring today has the potential to cause widespread electrical disruptions and blackouts as well as damage to the electrical power grid and satellites.[3][4][5]
History
Geomagnetic storm
On 1 and 2 September 1859, one of the largest geomagnetic storms (as recorded by ground-based magnetometers) occurred.[6] Estimates of the storm strength (Dst) range from −0.80 to −1.75 μT.[7]
The geomagnetic storm is thought to have been caused by a coronal mass ejection (CME) that traveled directly toward Earth, taking 17.6 hours to make the 150×106 km (93×106 mi) journey. Typical CMEs take several days to arrive at Earth, but it is believed that the relatively high speed of this CME was made possible by a prior CME, perhaps the cause of the large aurora event on 29 August that "cleared the way" of ambient solar wind plasma for the Carrington Event.[8]
Associated solar flare
Just before noon on 1 September 1859, the English astronomers Richard Carrington and Richard Hodgson independently recorded the earliest observations of a solar flare.[8] Carrington and Hodgson compiled independent reports which were published side by side in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and exhibited their drawings of the event at the November 1859 meeting of the Royal Astronomical Society.[9][10]
Because of a geomagnetic solar flare effect (a "magnetic crochet")[11] observed in the Kew Observatory magnetometer record by Scottish physicist Balfour Stewart and a geomagnetic storm observed the following day, Carrington suspected a solar–terrestrial connection.[12] However, he was not sure whether the two phenomena were related, writing that "one swallow does not make a summer".[9] Worldwide reports of the effects of the geomagnetic storm of 1859 were compiled and published by American mathematician Elias Loomis, which support the observations of Carrington and Stewart.[13]
Impact
Auroras
Auroras were seen around the world in the northern and southern hemispheres. The aurora borealis over the Rocky Mountains in the United States was so bright that the glow awakened gold miners, who were reported to have begun to prepare breakfast because they thought it was morning. It was also reported that people in the north-eastern United States could read a newspaper by the aurora's light.[8][14] The aurora was also visible from the poles to low latitude areas such as south-central Mexico,[15][16] Cuba, Hawaii, Queensland,[17] southern Japan and China,[18] New Zealand,[19] and even at lower latitudes very close to the equator, such as Colombia.[20]
On Saturday 3 September 1859, the Baltimore American and Commercial Advertiser reported that
Those who happened to be out late on Thursday night had an opportunity of witnessing another magnificent display of the auroral lights. The phenomenon was very similar to the display on Sunday night, though at times the light was, if possible, more brilliant, and the prismatic hues more varied and gorgeous. The light appeared to cover the whole firmament, apparently like a luminous cloud, through which the stars of the larger magnitude indistinctly shone. The light was greater than that of the moon at its full, but had an indescribable softness and delicacy that seemed to envelop everything upon which it rested. Between 12 and 1 o'clock, when the display was at its full brilliancy, the quiet streets of the city resting under this strange light, presented a beautiful as well as singular appearance.[21]
In 1909, an Australian gold miner named C. F. Herbert retold his observations in a letter to the Daily News in Perth,
I was gold-digging at Rokewood, about four miles [6 km] from Rokewood township (Victoria). Myself and two mates looking out of the tent saw a great reflection in the southern heavens at about 7 o'clock p.m., and in about half an hour, a scene of almost unspeakable beauty presented itself: Lights of every imaginable color were issuing from the southern heavens, one color fading away only to give place to another if possible more beautiful than the last, the streams mounting to the zenith, but always becoming a rich purple when reaching there, and always curling round, leaving a clear strip of sky, which may be described as four fingers held at arm's length. The northern side from the zenith was also illuminated with beautiful colors, always curling round at the zenith, but were considered to be merely a reproduction of the southern display, as all colors south and north always corresponded. It was a sight never to be forgotten, and was considered at the time to be the greatest aurora recorded [...]. The rationalist and pantheist saw nature in her most exquisite robes, recognising, the divine immanence, immutable law, cause, and effect. The superstitious and the fanatical had dire forebodings, and thought it a foreshadowing of Armageddon and final dissolution.[22]
Telegraphs
Because of the geomagnetically induced current from the electromagnetic field, telegraph systems all over Europe and North America failed, in some cases giving their operators electric shocks.[23] Telegraph pylons threw sparks.[24] Some operators were able to continue to send and receive messages despite having disconnected their power supplies.[25][26] The following conversation occurred between two operators of the American telegraph line between Boston, Massachusetts, and Portland, Maine, on the night of 2 September 1859 (as reported in the Boston Evening Traveler):
Boston operator (to Portland operator): "Please cut off your battery [power source] entirely for fifteen minutes."
Portland operator: "Will do so. It is now disconnected."
Boston: "Mine is disconnected, and we are working with the auroral current. How do you receive my writing?"
Portland: "Better than with our batteries on. – Current comes and goes gradually."
Boston: "My current is very strong at times, and we can work better without the batteries, as the aurora seems to neutralize and augment our batteries alternately, making current too strong at times for our relay magnets. Suppose we work without batteries while we are affected by this trouble."
Portland: "Very well. Shall I go ahead with business?"
Boston: "Yes. Go ahead."
The conversation was carried on for around two hours using no battery power and working solely with the current induced by the aurora, the first time on record that more than a word or two was transmitted in such manner.[27]
Similar events
Another strong solar storm occurred in February 1872.[28] Less severe storms also occurred in 1921 (this was comparable by some measures), 1938, 1941, 1958, 1959 and 1960, when widespread radio disruption was reported. The flares and CMEs of the August 1972 solar storms were similar to the Carrington event in size and magnitude; however, unlike the 1859 storms, they did not cause an extreme geomagnetic storm. The March 1989 geomagnetic storm knocked out power across large sections of Quebec, while the 2003 Halloween solar storms registered the most powerful solar explosions ever recorded. On 23 July 2012, a "Carrington-class" solar superstorm (solar flare, CME, solar electromagnetic pulse) was observed, but its trajectory narrowly missed Earth by a margin of roughly nine days.[5][29] During the May 2024 solar storms, an aurora borealis was sighted as far south as Puerto Rico.[30]
In June 2013, a joint venture from researchers at Lloyd's of London and Atmospheric and Environmental Research (AER) in the US used data from the Carrington Event to estimate the cost of a similar event in the present to the US alone at US$600 billion to $2.6 trillion (equivalent to $794 billion to $3.44 trillion in 2024[31]),[3] which, at the time, equated to roughly 3.6 to 15.5 percent of annual GDP. In addition to this effect on the general economy, there is also research that highlights the potential consequences of a large geomagnetic storm on agriculture. The effect here is indirect, meaning via the loss of access to agricultural inputs like fertilizer or pesticides, due to a disrupted industrial production. This has been estimated to potentially reduce yields by 38–48% globally, with yield losses of up to 75% in some areas like Central Europe.[32]
Other research has looked for signatures of large solar flares and CMEs in carbon-14 in tree rings and beryllium-10 (among other isotopes) in ice cores. The signature of a large solar storm has been found for the years 774–775 and 993–994.[33][34] Carbon-14 levels stored in 775 suggest an event about 20 times the normal variation of the Sun's activity, and 10 or more times the size of the Carrington Event.[35] An event in 7176 BCE may have exceeded even the 774–775 CE event based on this proxy data.[36]
Whether the physics of solar flares is similar to that of even larger superflares is still unclear. The Sun may differ in important ways such as size and speed of rotation from the types of stars that are known to produce superflares.[34]
Other evidence
Ice cores containing thin nitrate-rich layers have been analysed to reconstruct a history of past solar storms predating reliable observations. This was based on the hypothesis that solar energetic particles would ionize nitrogen, leading to the production of nitric oxide and other oxidised nitrogen compounds, which would not be too diluted in the atmosphere before being deposited along with snow.[37]
Beginning in 1986, some researchers claimed that data from Greenland ice cores showed evidence of individual solar particle events, including the Carrington Event.[38] More recent ice core work, however, casts significant doubt on this interpretation and shows that nitrate spikes are likely not a result of solar energetic particle events but can be due to terrestrial events such as forest fires, and correlate with other chemical signatures of known forest fire plumes. Nitrate events in cores from Greenland and Antarctica do not align, so the hypothesis that they reflect proton events is now in significant doubt.[37][39][40]
A 2024 study analysed digitized magnetogram readings from magnetic observatories at Kew and Greenwich. "Initial analysis suggests the rates of change of the field of over 700 nT/min exceeded the 1-in-100 years extreme value of 350–400 nT/min at this latitude based on digital-era records",[41] indicating a far greater change rate than modern digital measurements.[42]
See also
References
- Kimball, D. S. (April 1960). "A Study of the Aurora of 1859" (PDF). Geophysical Institute at the University of Alaska. Retrieved 28 November 2021.
- Tsurutani, B. T. (2003). "The extreme magnetic storm of 1–2 September 1859". Journal of Geophysical Research. 108 (A7) 2002JA009504: 1268. Bibcode:2003JGRA..108.1268T. doi:10.1029/2002JA009504. Retrieved 28 November 2021.
- Solar Storm Risk to the North American Electric Grid (PDF). Lloyd's of London and Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. 2013. Retrieved 17 February 2022.
- Baker, D. N.; et al. (2008). Severe Space Weather Events – Understanding Societal and Economic Impacts. Washington, D.C.: The National Academy Press. doi:10.17226/12507. ISBN 978-0-309-12769-1.
- Phillips, Dr. Tony (23 July 2014). "Near miss: The solar superstorm of July 2012". NASA. Retrieved 26 July 2014.
- Cliver, E. W.; Svalgaard, L. (2005). "The 1859 solar-terrestrial disturbance and the current limits on extreme space weather activity" (PDF). Solar Physics. 224 (1–2): 407–422. Bibcode:2004SoPh..224..407C. doi:10.1007/s11207-005-4980-z. S2CID 120093108. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 May 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
- "Near miss: The Solar superstorm of July 2012". NASA Science. 22 July 2014. Retrieved 14 September 2016.
- Odenwald, Sten F.; Green, James L. (28 July 2008). "Bracing the satellite infrastructure for a Solar superstorm". Scientific American. 299 (2): 80–87. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0808-80 (inactive 12 August 2026). PMID 18666683. Retrieved 16 February 2011.
- Carrington, R. C. (1859). "Description of a singular appearance seen in the Sun on September 1, 1859". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 20: 13–15. Bibcode:1859MNRAS..20...13C. doi:10.1093/mnras/20.1.13.
- Hodgson, R. (1859). "On a curious appearance seen in the Sun". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 20: 15–16. Bibcode:1859MNRAS..20...15H. doi:10.1093/mnras/20.1.15.
- Thompson, Richard (24 September 2015). "A solar flare effect". Space Weather Services. Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 2 September 2015.
- Clark, Stuart (2007). The Sun Kings: The Unexpected Tragedy of Richard Carrington and the Tale of How Modern Astronomy Began. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. pp. 23, 82, 91, 193. ISBN 978-0-691-12660-9.
- The 9 articles by E. Loomis published from November 1859 to July 1862 in the American Journal of Science regarding "The great auroral exhibition", 28 – 4 August September 1859:
- Loomis, Elias (November 1859). "The Great Auroral Exhibition of August 28th to September 4th, 1859". The American Journal of Science. 2nd series. 28: 385–408.
- Loomis, Elias (January 1860). "The Great Auroral Exhibition of August 28th to September 4th, 1859 – 2d Article". The American Journal of Science. 2nd series. 29: 92–97.
- Loomis, Elias (February 1860). "The Great Auroral Exhibition of August 28th to September 4th, 1859 – 3d Article". The American Journal of Science. 2nd series. 29: 249–266.
- Loomis, Elias (May 1860). "The Great Auroral Exhibition of Aug. 28th to Sept. 4th, 1859 – 4th Article". The American Journal of Science. 2nd series. 29: 386–399.
- Loomis, Elias (July 1860). "The Great Auroral Exhibition of Aug. 28th to Sept. 4th, 1859; and the Geographical Distribution of Auroras and Thunder storms – 5th Article". The American Journal of Science. 2nd series. 30: 79–100.
- Loomis, Elias (November 1860). "The Great Auroral Exhibition of Aug. 28th to Sept. 4th, 1859 – 6th Article". The American Journal of Science. 2nd series. 30: 339–361.
- Loomis, Elias (July 1861). "The Great Auroral Exhibition of Aug. 28th to Sept. 4th, 1859 – 7th Article". The American Journal of Science. 2nd series. 32 (94): 71–84. Bibcode:1861AmJS...32...71L. doi:10.2475/ajs.s2-32.94.71.
- Loomis, Elias (September 1861). "On the great Auroral Exhibition of Aug. 28th to Sept. 4th, 1859, and Auroras generally. – 8th Article". The American Journal of Science. 2nd series. 32 (96): 318–335. Bibcode:1861AmJS...32..318L. doi:10.2475/ajs.s2-32.96.318.
- Loomis, Elias (July 1862). "On Electrical currents circulating near the earth's surface and their connection with the phenomena of the Aurora Polaris. – 9th Article". The American Journal of Science. 2nd series. 34: 34–45.
- Lovett, R. A. (2 March 2011). "What if the biggest solar storm on record happened today?". National Geographic News. Archived from the original on 5 March 2011. Retrieved 5 September 2011.
- Hayakawa, H. (2018). "Low-latitude aurorae during the extreme space weather events in 1859". The Astrophysical Journal. 869 (1): 57. arXiv:1811.02786. Bibcode:2018ApJ...869...57H. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae47c. S2CID 119386459.
- González-Esparza, J. A.; Cuevas-Cardona, M. C. (2018). "Observations of Low Latitude Red Aurora in Mexico During the 1859 Carrington Geomagnetic Storm". Space Weather. 16 (6): 593. Bibcode:2018SpWea..16..593G. doi:10.1029/2017SW001789.
- Green, J. (2006). "Duration and extent of the great auroral storm of 1859". Advances in Space Research. 38 (2): 130–135. Bibcode:2006AdSpR..38..130G. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.08.054. PMC 5215858. PMID 28066122.
- Hayakawa, H. (2016). "East Asian observations of low-latitude aurora during the Carrington magnetic storm". Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan. 68 (6) psw097: 99. arXiv:1608.07702. Bibcode:2016PASJ...68...99H. doi:10.1093/pasj/psw097. S2CID 119268875.
- Green, Kate (29 December 2024). "The Carrington Event: How NZ evaded disaster". Radio New Zealand.
- Moreno Cárdenas, Freddy; Cristancho Sánchez, Sergio; Vargas Domínguez, Santiago; Hayakawa, Satoshi; Kumar, Sandeep; Mukherjee, Shyamoli; Veenadhari, B. (2016). "The grand aurorae borealis seen in Colombia in 1859". Advances in Space Research. 57 (1): 257–267. arXiv:1508.06365. Bibcode:2016AdSpR..57..257M. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2015.08.026. S2CID 119183512.
- "The Aurora Borealis". Baltimore American and Commercial Advertiser. 3 September 1859. p. 2, column 2. Retrieved 16 February 2011.
- Herbert, Count Frank (8 October 1909). "The Great Aurora of 1859". The Daily News. Perth, Western Australia. p. 9. Retrieved 1 April 2018.
- Severe Space Weather Events – Understanding Societal and Economic Impacts: A Workshop Report. Committee on the Societal and Economic Impacts of Severe Space Weather Events: A Workshop, National Research Council (Report). National Academies Press. 2008. p. 13. ISBN 978-0-309-12769-1.
- Odenwald, Sten F. (2002). The 23rd Cycle. Columbia University Press. p. 28. ISBN 978-0-231-12079-1 – via archive.org.
- Carlowicz, Michael J.; Lopez, Ramon E. (2002). Storms from the Sun: The emerging science of space weather. National Academies Press. p. 58. ISBN 978-0-309-07642-5.
- Loomis, Elias; Kingston, G. P.; Lyman, C. S.; Twining, Alexander C.; Kirkwood, Daniel; Cornette, A.; Poey, Andreas; Trask, John B.; et al. (1859). "The great Auroral Exhibition of August 28th to September 4th, 1859". American Journal of Science. 2nd series. 28 (84): 385.
[...] in more than one case the north and south [telegraph] lines were worked during the daytime of September 3d solely by the atmospheric influence!
- Green, James L.; Boardsen, Scott; Odenwald, Sten; Humble, John; Pazamickas, Katherine A. (1 January 2006). "Eyewitness reports of the great auroral storm of 1859". Advances in Space Research. The Great Historical Geomagnetic Storm of 1859: A Modern Look. 38 (2): 145–154. Bibcode:2006AdSpR..38..145G. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.12.021. hdl:2060/20050210157. ISSN 0273-1177.
- Hayakawa, Hisashi; et al. (2023). "The extreme space weather event of 1872 February: sunspots, magnetic disturbance, and auroral displays". The Astrophysical Journal. 959 (23): 23. arXiv:2501.00176. Bibcode:2023ApJ...959...23H. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc6cc.
- Carrington-class coronal mass ejection narrowly misses Earth (video). NASA. 28 April 2014. Event occurs at 04:03. Retrieved 26 July 2014 – via YouTube.
- Garofalo, Meredith (13 May 2024). "How a giant sunspot unleashed solar storms that spawned global auroras that just dazzled us all". Space.com. Archived from the original on 15 May 2024. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
- Johnston, Louis; Williamson, Samuel H. (2023). "What Was the U.S. GDP Then?". MeasuringWorth. Retrieved 30 November 2023. United States Gross Domestic Product deflator figures follow the MeasuringWorth series.
- Moersdorf, Jessica; Rivers, Morgan; Denkenberger, David; Breuer, Lutz; Jehn, Florian Ulrich (January 2024). "The Fragile State of Industrial Agriculture: Estimating Crop Yield Reductions in a Global Catastrophic Infrastructure Loss Scenario". Global Challenges. 8 (1) 2300206. Bibcode:2024GloCh...800206M. doi:10.1002/gch2.202300206. PMC 10784200. PMID 38223898.
- Hudson, Hugh S. (2021). "Carrington Events". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 59: 445–477. Bibcode:2021ARA&A..59..445H. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-023324. ISSN 0066-4146. S2CID 241040835.
- Battersby, Stephen (19 November 2019). "Core concept: What are the chances of a hazardous solar superflare?". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116 (47): 23368–23370. Bibcode:2019PNAS..11623368B. doi:10.1073/pnas.1917356116. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 6876210. PMID 31744927.
- Crockett, Christopher (17 September 2021). "Are we ready? Understanding just how big solar flares can get". Knowable Magazine. doi:10.1146/knowable-091721-1. S2CID 239204944. Retrieved 30 September 2021.
- Paleari, Chiara I.; Mekhaldi, Florian; Adolphi, Florian; Christl, Marcus; Vockenhuber, Christof; Gautschi, Philip; Beer, Jürg; Brehm, Nicolas; Erhardt, Tobias; Synal, Hans-Arno; Wacker, Lukas; Wilhelms, Frank; Muscheler, Raimund (2022). "Cosmogenic radionuclides reveal an extreme solar particle storm near a solar minimum 9125 years BP". Nature Communications. 13 (1) 214. Bibcode:2022NatCo..13..214P. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27891-4. PMC 8752676. PMID 35017519.
- Wolff, E. W.; Bigler, M.; Curran, M. A. J.; Dibb, J.; Frey, M. M.; Legrand, M. (2012). "The Carrington event not observed in most ice core nitrate records". Geophysical Research Letters. 39 (8): 21, 585, 598. Bibcode:2012GeoRL..39.8503W. doi:10.1029/2012GL051603.
- McCracken, K. G.; Dreschhoff, G. A. M.; Zeller, E. J.; Smart, D. F.; Shea, M. A. (2001). "Solar cosmic ray events for the period 1561–1994 – 1. Identification in polar-ice, 1561–1950". Journal of Geophysical Research. 106 (A10): 21, 585, 598. Bibcode:2001JGR...10621585M. doi:10.1029/2000JA000237.
- Duderstadt, K. A.; et al. (2014). "Nitrate deposition to surface snow at Summit, Greenland, following the 9 November 2000 solar proton event". Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 119 (11): 6938–6957. Bibcode:2014JGRD..119.6938D. doi:10.1002/2013JD021389.
- Mekhaldi, F.; McConnell, J. R.; Adolphi, F.; Arienzo, M. M.; Chellman, N. J.; Maselli, O. J.; et al. (November 2017). "No coincident nitrate enhancement events in polar ice cores following the largest known Solar storms". Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 122 (21): 11, 900–911, 913. Bibcode:2017JGRD..12211900M. doi:10.1002/2017JD027325.
- Beggan, C. D.; Clarke, E.; Lawrence, E.; Eaton, E.; Williamson, J.; Matsumoto, K.; Hayakawa, H. (29 February 2024). "Digitized Continuous Magnetic Recordings for the August/September 1859 Storms From London, UK". Space Weather. 22 (3) e2023SW003807. Bibcode:2024SpWea..2203807B. doi:10.1029/2023SW003807. ISSN 1542-7390.
- Luntz, Stephen (25 March 2024). "History's Biggest Solar Storm, The Carrington Event, Was Even Bigger Than We Realized". IFLScience. Retrieved 26 March 2024.
Further reading
- Brooks, Michael (18 March 2009). "Space storm alert: 90 seconds from catastrophe". New Scientist. Archived from the original on 22 March 2009. — Accessible overview of potential modern impacts of a similar event.
- "The largest magnetic storm on record ... or is it? The 'Carrington Event' of August 27 to September 7, 1859: Recorded at Greenwich Observatory, London". British Geological Survey. 2011. Archived from the original on 6 November 2010. Retrieved 28 March 2009.
- Calvin, Robert Clauer; Siscoe, George L., eds. (2006). "The great historical geomagnetic storm of 1859: A modern look". Advances in Space Research. 38 (2): 115–388. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2006.09.002. — Special issue containing multiple studies on various aspects of the Carrington Event.
- Green, J.; Boardsen, S.; Odenwald, S.; Humble, J.; Pazamickas, K. (2006). "Eyewitness reports of the great auroral storm of 1859". Advances in Space Research. 38 (2): 145–154. Bibcode:2006AdSpR..38..145G. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.12.021. hdl:2060/20050210157. — Collection of historical observations and accounts.
- Silverman, S. (2006). "Comparison of the aurora of September 1–2, 1859 with other great auroras". Advances in Space Research. 38 (2): 136–144. Bibcode:2006AdSpR..38..136S. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.03.157.
- "Solar Storm 1859". Solar Storms. 17 April 2017. — Collection of newspaper accounts of the Carrington Event.
External links
Media related to Carrington Event at Wikimedia Commons
Quotations related to Carrington Event at Wikiquote
No comments:
Post a Comment