I was interested in what John Douglas had to say regarding sensitivity to Electrical Fields. He was saying that it is an organism that attaches itself to neurons in the brain that picks up the electrical fields and relays them to the neurons so the neurons experience them.
As someone who can clairvoyantly "See" inside human bodies in order to better diagnose them for some ailments than blood tests can I was interested in what he had to say about this.
I can remember during the early 1970s when satellite microwaves and other instruments I could feel very strongly were harming my inner peace. At one point I dug down at my father's house 13 feet down into the hardpan just to get some relief from this and to get some peace. However, over time I realized I needed to pray to not be so vulnerable to electrical fields and noise. Even then, if I bought a calculator wrist watch I couldn't wear it very long because it would make my wrist hurt from the electrical fields present there.
However, now I can have an Iphone or Android in my pocket and as long as I put it on top of my wallet I usually don't have many ill effects. However, it is also true that if I'm driving a car I take it out of my pocket and either put it on the dashboard or in some type of container usually in between the two front seats of whatever vehicle I'm in to avoid any extra electrical fields harming any parts of my body.
Also, I don't put a cell phone up to my head unless I have no other option. So, 90% or more of the time I never have a cell phone up to my head talking.
I think that people who either don't have a cell phone at all or people who minimize their exposure are the ones who likely won't get some kind of brain cancer or other type of cancer during the next 10 to 20 years here on earth.
I most worry about people who put cell phones in pockets near their hearts. I often see this and think "What are you thinking? Are you a Lemming or something?"
But, as we all know there are many ways "natural selection" is in place. And also I'm sure there might be people whose genetics might be totally impervious to electrical fields. So, maybe 100 years from now this is who might inherit the world along with people who don't eat GMOs or people who don't smoke cigarrettes or people who don't take anti-depressants or other harmful drugs to human beings.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- The Womb of God
- Blank Link Code for HTML Language
- Ukrainian drones hit St Petersburg as Putin's flagship economic forum opens: full article
- The Screen door with Gray duct tape?
- Former Trump adviser John Bolton to plead guilty to retaining national security info
- Part of Medical PTSD can be that you do not believe then that you are going to survive what you are going through
- Most read articles as of Thursday June 4th 2026
- Senate begins vote on Republican bill to fund ICE as GOP is split on Trump’s $1.8B fund
- Moderation in all things
- Republican-led House votes to rebuke Trump over war with Iran: Full Article
Showing posts with label Natural Selection?. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Natural Selection?. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 16, 2014
Saturday, July 12, 2014
Natural Selection?
Though some of you might say rightly so that in this instance natural selection has become sort of twisted, I might actually agree with you. However, I think natural selection has always been sort of twisted to begin with.
For example, what happened when species lived in places with marginal food and water instead of plentiful food and water? Only the most resourceful among that species survived. The same is true today among the human race competing for survival. Only the most resourceful will survive.
So, that resourcefulness has as much to do with WHERE one chooses to live on earth in addition to HOW one lives on earth in addition to WHAT culture one lives in in addition to one's natural genetics and intelligence and opportunities.
However, as time moves on it is not just physical "NATURAL SELECTION" it is also digital natural selection as well.
I think it is a balance of how much people know or don't know about electronics and the Internet and smart phones and devices as opposed to how little they know.
It seems to me there is a balance point somewhere. In other words isn't someone completely "off the Grid" electronic wise safer without any knowledge whatsoever of having anything electronic ever at all?
That argument could be made because no secrets of that person would be known necessarily unless they have a birth certificate and a passport or Driver's license or something like that. So, if they got paid cash and only used cash and didn't have a bank account or a birth certificate or passport or driver's license they could be completely off the grid and unknown to any system.
For example, many people when I was in India in the 1980s asked to return home to the U.S. with us. Hundreds of people asked us to go home with us. They said they would literally do anything or become life long servants in order to do this. However, even if you wanted to do this and found someone perfect to be an ongoing baby sitter or something like that you could not bring them home with you because they had no passport, no birth cerificate, no education, no driver's license. In other words in some ways they did not exist to the world because of having no identification at all. Likely, there are still billions of people like this around the world now who never had birth certificates or any education at all and so literally don't exist legally speaking.
Are they better off than the rest of us in some ways? One of my answers might be: "YES".
For example, what happened when species lived in places with marginal food and water instead of plentiful food and water? Only the most resourceful among that species survived. The same is true today among the human race competing for survival. Only the most resourceful will survive.
So, that resourcefulness has as much to do with WHERE one chooses to live on earth in addition to HOW one lives on earth in addition to WHAT culture one lives in in addition to one's natural genetics and intelligence and opportunities.
However, as time moves on it is not just physical "NATURAL SELECTION" it is also digital natural selection as well.
I think it is a balance of how much people know or don't know about electronics and the Internet and smart phones and devices as opposed to how little they know.
It seems to me there is a balance point somewhere. In other words isn't someone completely "off the Grid" electronic wise safer without any knowledge whatsoever of having anything electronic ever at all?
That argument could be made because no secrets of that person would be known necessarily unless they have a birth certificate and a passport or Driver's license or something like that. So, if they got paid cash and only used cash and didn't have a bank account or a birth certificate or passport or driver's license they could be completely off the grid and unknown to any system.
For example, many people when I was in India in the 1980s asked to return home to the U.S. with us. Hundreds of people asked us to go home with us. They said they would literally do anything or become life long servants in order to do this. However, even if you wanted to do this and found someone perfect to be an ongoing baby sitter or something like that you could not bring them home with you because they had no passport, no birth cerificate, no education, no driver's license. In other words in some ways they did not exist to the world because of having no identification at all. Likely, there are still billions of people like this around the world now who never had birth certificates or any education at all and so literally don't exist legally speaking.
Are they better off than the rest of us in some ways? One of my answers might be: "YES".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)